Aquatic plant community invasibility and scale-dependent patterns in native and invasive species richness.

Invasive species richness often is negatively correlated with native species richness at the small spatial scale of sampling plots, but positively correlated in larger areas. The pattern at small scales has been interpreted as evidence that native plants can competitively exclude invasive species. Large-scale patterns have been understood to result from environmental heterogeneity, among other causes. We investigated species richness patterns among submerged and floating-leaved aquatic plants (87 native species and eight invasives) in 103 temperate lakes in Connecticut (northeastern USA) and found neither a consistently negative relationship at small (3-m2) scales, nor a positive relationship at large scales. Native species richness at sampling locations was uncorrelated with invasive species richness in 37 of the 60 lakes where invasive plants occurred; richness was negatively correlated in 16 lakes and positively correlated in seven. No correlation between native and invasive species richness was found at larger spatial scales (whole lakes and counties). Increases in richness with area were uncorrelated with abiotic heterogeneity. Logistic regression showed that the probability of occurrence of five invasive species increased in sampling locations (3 m2, n = 2980 samples) where native plants occurred, indicating that native plant species richness provided no resistance against invasion. However, the probability of three invasive species' occurrence declined as native plant density increased, indicating that density, if not species richness, provided some resistance with these species. Density had no effect on occurrence of three other invasive species. Based on these results, native species may resist invasion at small spatial scales only in communities where density is high (i.e., in communities where competition among individuals contributes to community structure). Most hydrophyte communities, however, appear to be maintained in a nonequilibrial condition by stress and/or disturbance. Therefore, most aquatic plant communities in temperate lakes are likely to be vulnerable to invasion.

[1]  P. Chesson,et al.  Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions , 2002 .

[2]  A. Knapp,et al.  Dominance not richness determines invasibility of tallgrass prairie. , 2004 .

[3]  W. M. Lonsdale,et al.  GLOBAL PATTERNS OF PLANT INVASIONS AND THE CONCEPT OF INVASIBILITY , 1999 .

[4]  R. S. Capers.  Macrophyte colonization in a freshwater tidal wetland (Lyme, CT, USA) , 2003 .

[5]  Thomas J. Stohlgren,et al.  The rich get richer: patterns of plant invasions in the United States , 2003 .

[6]  M. Moody,et al.  Evidence of hybridity in invasive watermilfoil (Myriophyllum) populations , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Donald H. Les,et al.  Aquatic and wetland plants of northeastern North America , 2001 .

[8]  N. McCreary.  Competition as a mechanism of submersed macrophyte community structure , 1991 .

[9]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[10]  Jonathan M. Levine,et al.  Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility , 1999 .

[11]  D. Lodge.  Herbivory on freshwater macrophytes , 1991 .

[12]  C. S. Holling.  Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems , 1973 .

[13]  D. Pimentel,et al.  Environmental and Economic Costs of Nonindigenous Species in the United States , 2000 .

[14]  D. Tilman.  Biodiversity: Population Versus Ecosystem Stability , 1995 .

[15]  C. Elton.  The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants , 1960, Springer US.

[16]  David Tilman,et al.  Plant diversity increases resistance to invasion in the absence of covarying extrinsic factors , 2000 .

[17]  J. W. G. Lund,et al.  A Manual on Methods for Measuring Primary Production in Aquatic Environments. , 1970 .

[18]  Donald H. Les,et al.  Introduction of Nonindigenous Aquatic Vascular Plants in Southern New England: A Historical Perspective , 1999, Biological Invasions.

[19]  P. Keddy,et al.  Competition, survivorship and growth in macrophyte communities , 1991 .

[20]  Mark A. Davis,et al.  Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility , 2000 .

[21]  T. Case,et al.  Invasion resistance arises in strongly interacting species-rich model competition communities. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Charles C. Elton,et al.  The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. , 1959 .

[23]  Yu Tian,et al.  [Land use pattern and its dynamic changes in Amur tiger distribution region]. , 1983, Ying yong sheng tai xue bao = The journal of applied ecology.

[24]  B. Jupp,et al.  Limitations of Macrophytes in a Eutrophic Lake, Loch Leven: II. Wave Action, Sediments and Waterfowl Grazing , 1977 .

[25]  D. Simberloff,et al.  ECOLOGICAL RESISTANCE TO BIOLOGICAL INVASION OVERWHELMED BY PROPAGULE PRESSURE , 2005 .

[26]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  A comparative approach to examine competitive response of 48 wetland plant species , 1998 .

[27]  G. Crow,et al.  Aquatic and Wetland Plants of Northeastern North America, Volume I: A Revised and Enlarged Edition of Norman C. Fassett's A Manual of Aquatic Plants, Volume I: Pteridophytes, Gymnosperms, and Angiosperms: Dicotyledons , 1999 .

[28]  D. Wilcove,et al.  QUANTIFYING THREATS TO IMPERILED SPECIES IN THE UNITED STATES , 1998 .

[29]  D. Simberloff,et al.  The importance of biological inertia in plant community resistance to invasion , 2003 .

[30]  R. S. Capers,et al.  A comparison of two sampling techniques in the study of submersed macrophyte richness and abundance , 2000 .

[31]  T. Blackburn,et al.  The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  M. Ritchie,et al.  THE EFFECT OF AQUATIC PLANT SPECIES RICHNESS ON WETLAND ECOSYSTEM PROCESSES , 2002 .

[33]  C. Boylen,et al.  An underwater survey method for estimating submerged macrophyte population density and biomass , 1978 .

[34]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 14th edition. , 1976 .

[35]  D. Hodáňová.  Plant strategies and vegetation processes , 1981, Biologia Plantarum.

[36]  B. Gilbert,et al.  INVASIBILITY AND ABIOTIC GRADIENTS: THE POSITIVE CORRELATION BETWEEN NATIVE AND EXOTIC PLANT DIVERSITY , 2005 .

[37]  R. S. Capers,et al.  Introduction of Glossostigma (Phrymaceae) to North America: a taxonomic and ecological overview. , 2006, American journal of botany.

[38]  G. Crow,et al.  Aquatic and Wetland Plants of Northeastern North America, Volume II: A Revised and Enlarged Edition of Norman C. Fassett's A Manual of Aquatic Plants, Volume II: Angiosperms: Monocotyledons , 1999 .

[39]  David Tilman,et al.  Biodiversity as a barrier to ecological invasion , 2002, Nature.

[40]  Susan K. Wiser,et al.  COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND FOREST INVASION BY AN EXOTIC HERB OVER 23 YEARS , 1998 .

[41]  Brian D. Inouye,et al.  SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY EXPLAINS THE SCALE DEPENDENCE OF THE NATIVE-EXOTIC DIVERSITY RELATIONSHIP , 2005 .

[42]  M. Barrat-Segretain.  Strategies of reproduction, dispersion, and competition in river plants: A review , 1996, Vegetatio.

[43]  J. Eaton,et al.  Effects of pleasure-boat traffic on macrophyte growth in canals , 1983 .

[44]  S. Andelman,et al.  Invasion in space and time: non‐native species richness and relative abundance respond to interannual variation in productivity and diversity , 2004 .

[45]  B. Gopal,et al.  Competition and allelopathy in aquatic plant communities , 1993, The Botanical Review.

[46]  Michael A. Huston,et al.  Local processes and regional patterns : appropriate scales for understanding variation in the diversity of plants and animals , 1999 .

[47]  S. Pickett,et al.  Beyond biodiversity: individualistic controls of invasion in a self‐assembled community , 2004 .

[48]  N. Willby,et al.  Regenerative strategies of aquatic macrophytes in flood disturbed habitats : the role of the propagule bank. , 2001 .

[49]  Robert K. Peet,et al.  DIVERSITY AND INVASIBILITY OF SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN PLANT COMMUNITIES , 2003 .