Morphometric characterisation of wing feathers of the barn owl Tyto alba pratincola and the pigeon Columba livia

BackgroundOwls are known for their silent flight. Even though there is some information available on the mechanisms that lead to a reduction of noise emission, neither the morphological basis, nor the biological mechanisms of the owl's silent flight are known. Therefore, we have initiated a systematic analysis of wing morphology in both a specialist, the barn owl, and a generalist, the pigeon. This report presents a comparison between the feathers of the barn owl and the pigeon and emphasise the specific characteristics of the owl's feathers on macroscopic and microscopic level. An understanding of the features and mechanisms underlying this silent flight might eventually be employed for aerodynamic purposes and lead to a new wing design in modern aircrafts.ResultsA variety of different feathers (six remiges and six coverts), taken from several specimen in either species, were investigated. Quantitative analysis of digital images and scanning electron microscopy were used for a morphometric characterisation. Although both species have comparable body weights, barn owl feathers were in general larger than pigeon feathers. For both species, the depth and the area of the outer vanes of the remiges were typically smaller than those of the inner vanes. This difference was more pronounced in the barn owl than in the pigeon. Owl feathers also had lesser radiates, longer pennula, and were more translucent than pigeon feathers. The two species achieved smooth edges and regular surfaces of the vanes by different construction principles: while the angles of attachment to the rachis and the length of the barbs was nearly constant for the barn owl, these parameters varied in the pigeon. We also present a quantitative description of several characteristic features of barn owl feathers, e.g., the serrations at the leading edge of the wing, the fringes at the edges of each feather, and the velvet-like dorsal surface.ConclusionThe quantitative description of the feathers and the specific structures of owl feathers can be used as a model for the construction of a biomimetic airplane wing or, in general, as a source for noise-reducing applications on any surfaces subjected to flow fields.

[1]  H. Wagner,et al.  Neurophysiological and anatomical substrates of sound localization in the owl , 1988 .

[2]  R. R. Graham,et al.  The Silent Flight of Owls , 1934, The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society.

[3]  R. Arndt,et al.  Effect of leading edge serrations on noise radiation from a model rotor , 1972 .

[4]  Muller,et al.  Air transmissivity of feathers , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[5]  David P. Lockard,et al.  The Airframe Noise Reduction Challenge , 2004 .

[6]  R. Payne Acoustic location of prey by barn owls (Tyto alba). , 1971, The Journal of experimental biology.

[7]  G. M. Klump,et al.  Absolute hearing thresholds and critical masking ratios in the European barn owl: a comparison with other owls , 1998, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[8]  E. Knudsen The Hearing of the Barn Owl , 1981 .

[9]  P. T. Soderman,et al.  Aerodynamic effects of leading-edge serrations on a two-dimensional airfoil , 1972 .

[10]  Nachweis eines „clap-and-fling-Mechanismus“ bei der im Windkanal fliegenden Haustaube , 1982, Journal für Ornithologie.

[11]  H. J. Allen,et al.  The effects of leading-edge serrations on reducing flow unsteadiness about airfoils. , 1973 .

[12]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  Influence of the facial ruff on the sound-receiving characteristics of the barn owl’s ears , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[13]  Gerald M. Edelman,et al.  Auditory function : neurobiological bases of hearing , 1988 .

[14]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  A comparison of neural computations underlying stereo vision and sound localization , 2004, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[15]  Geoffrey M. Lilley,et al.  A Study of the Silent Flight of the Owl , 1998 .

[16]  P. T. Soderman,et al.  Leading edge serrations which reduce the noise of low-speed rotors , 1973 .

[17]  Helmut Sick,et al.  Morphologisch-funktionelle Untersuchungen über die Feinstruktur der Vogelfeder , 1937, Journal für Ornithologie.

[18]  Ennes Sarradj,et al.  Noise Generation by Porous Airfoils , 2007 .

[19]  J. Willott Handbook of Mouse Auditory Research: From Behavior to Molecular Biology , 2001 .

[20]  J. L. Leeuwen,et al.  How swifts control their glide performance with morphing wings , 2006, Nature.

[21]  Otto Lilienthal Der Vogelflug als Grundlage der Fliegekunst , 1943 .

[22]  Ennos,et al.  Functional morphology of the vanes of the flight feathers of the pigeon Columba livia , 1995, The Journal of experimental biology.

[23]  J. Rayner,et al.  Avian wingtip shape reconsidered: wingtip shape indices and morphological adaptations to migration , 1998 .

[24]  M. Konishi Coding of auditory space. , 2003, Annual review of neuroscience.

[25]  T. C. Helvey,et al.  Low Speed Aerodynamics for Ultra-Quiet Flight , 1972 .