[Unilateral spinal anesthesia with low 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine dose.].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Unilateral spinal anesthesia may be advantageous, especially for outpatient procedures. Low anesthetic doses, pencil point or cutting point needles, slow injection rate and the lateral position have been reported as helping unilateral spinal anesthesia technique. This longitudinal study aimed at investigating the depth of unilateral spinal anesthesia with 5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine injected with 27G Quincke needle with patients in the lateral position and limb to be operated on facing downward. METHODS Spinal anesthesia with 0.5% bupivacaine and 27G Quincke needle was induced in 30 patients physical status ASA I-II submitted to orthopedic surgeries. Spinal puncture was performed with patients previously placed with the side to be operated on facing downward and 5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine were injected at 1 mL.15s-1. Sensory and motor blocks (pinprick and 0 to 3 scores) were compared between operated and contralateral sides. RESULTS Motor and sensory blocks between operated and contralateral sides were significantly different in all moments. Unilateral spinal anesthesia was obtained in 85.7% of patients. There has been hemodynamic stability in all patients. No patient has developed post dural puncture headache. CONCLUSIONS In the conditions of our study, 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (5 mg) has provided predominantly unilateral block. Twenty minutes were enough for blockade installation. Major unilateral spinal anesthesia advantages are hemodynamic stability, patients satisfaction and faster anesthetic recovery.

[1]  L. E. Imbelloni,et al.  [Low isobaric 0.5% bupivacaine doses for unilateral spinal anesthesia.]. , 2004, Revista brasileira de anestesiologia.

[2]  L. E. Imbelloni,et al.  Low hypobaric bupivacaine doses for unilateral spinal anesthesia. , 2003, Revista brasileira de anestesiologia.

[3]  K. Pihlajamäki,et al.  A Low Dose of Plain or Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia , 2000, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[4]  K. Pihlajamäki,et al.  Low‐dose bupivacaine: a comparison of hypobaric and near isobaric solutions for arthroscopic surgery of the knee , 1999, Anaesthesia.

[5]  G. Fanelli,et al.  Frequency of hypotension during conventional or asymmetric hyperbaric spinal block. , 1999, Regional anesthesia and pain medicine.

[6]  A. Esmaoğlu,et al.  Unilateral spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine , 1998, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[7]  G. Fanelli,et al.  Does speed of intrathecal injection affect the distribution of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine? , 1998, British journal of anaesthesia.

[8]  A. Forster,et al.  The Effects of Solution Concentration and Epinephrine on Lateral Distribution of Hyperbaric Tetracaine Spinal Anesthesia , 1996, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[9]  Jörg Meyer,et al.  Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia Using Low-Flow Injection Through a 29-Gauge Quincke Needle , 1996, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[10]  M. Bazaral,et al.  Transient Neurologic Deficit After Spinal Anesthesia: Local Anesthetic Maldistribution with Pencil Point Needles? , 1995, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[11]  G. Pittoni,et al.  Spinal Anesthesia in Outpatient Knee Surgery: 22-Gauge Versus 25-Gauge Sprotte Needle , 1995, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[12]  K. C. Kim,et al.  Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia Can Be Obtained With Low Dose Bupivacaine , 1992 .

[13]  F. V. Van Bergen,et al.  SPINAL HEMIANALGESIA: AN EVALUATION OF A METHOD, ITS APPLICABILITY, AND INFLUENCE ON THE INCIDENCE OF HYPOTENSION , 1961, Anesthesiology.