Target Detection in Noise by Echolocating Dolphins

It is well known that dolphins possess a sonar capability which allows them to project acoustic energy and analyze returning echoes in order to detect and recognize objects under water. The use of acoustic energy is probably the most effective way to probe an underwater environment for purposes of navigation, obstacle avoidance, prey and predator detection, and object localization and detection. Acoustic and other mechanical vibrational energy propagates in water more efficiently than any form of energy including electromagnetic, thermal and optical energy. Since the natural habitats of many dolphin species include shallow bays, inlets, coastal waters, swamps, marshlands, and rivers that are often so murky or turbid that vision is severely limited, these animals must rely heavily on their active and passive sonar capabilities for survival. Some of the sonar capabilities of dolphins have been described in review articles by Nachtigall (1980) and Au (1988).

[1]  W. Au,et al.  Critical ratio and bandwidth of the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) , 1983 .

[2]  A. E. Murchison,et al.  Detection Range and Range Resolution of Echolocating Bottlenose Porpoise (Tursiops truncatus) , 1980 .

[3]  R. Busnel,et al.  Animal Sonar Systems , 1980, NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series.

[4]  Paul E. Nachtigall,et al.  Odontocete Echolocation Performance on Object Size, Shape and Material , 1980 .

[5]  P. Moore,et al.  The critical interval in dolphin echolocation: what is it? , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  W. W. Peterson,et al.  The theory of signal detectability , 1954, Trans. IRE Prof. Group Inf. Theory.

[7]  Whitlow W. L. Au,et al.  Long‐range target detection in open waters by an echolocating Atlantic Bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) , 1980 .

[8]  Whitlow W. L. Au,et al.  Target detection in noise by echolocating Atlantic bottlenose dolphins , 1981 .

[9]  W. Au,et al.  Receiving beam patterns and directivity indices of the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin Tursiops truncatus. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  W. Sullivan,et al.  Animal Sonar: Processes and Performance , 1990 .

[11]  C. S. Johnson,et al.  Relation between absolute thresholdand duration-of-tone pulses in the bottlenosed porpoise. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  W. Au Echolocation Signals of the Atlantic Bottlenose Dolphin ( Tursiops truncatus) in Open Waters , 1980 .

[13]  P W Moore,et al.  Detection of complex echoes in noise by an echolocating dolphin. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Whitlow W. L. Au Detection and Recognition Models of Dolphin Sonar Systems , 1988 .

[15]  G. Clark,et al.  Psychophysical studies evaluating the feasibility of a speech processing strategy for a multiple-channel cochlear implant. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  R. Urick Ambient Noise in the Sea , 1986 .

[17]  H. Urkowitz Energy detection of unknown deterministic signals , 1967 .

[18]  W. Au,et al.  Comparison of target detection capabilities of the beluga and bottlenose dolphin. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  R. W. Floyd,et al.  Measurement of echolocation signals of the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus Montagu, in open waters. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  C. S. Johnson Masked tonal thresholds in the bottlenosed porpoise. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.