Gestaltung gebrauchstauglicher tangibler MMS für Industrie 4.0 – ein Leitfaden für Planer und Entwickler von mobilen Produktionsassistenzsystemen

ZusammenfassungIn Folge der vierten industriellen Revolution sowie der zunehmenden Vernetzung von Maschinen, Anlagen und Menschen entstehen neuartige Mensch-Maschine-Schnittstellen (MMS), z. B. in Form von mobilen Produktionsassistenzsystemen. Eine intersubjektiv nachvollziehbare Vorgehensweise bei der Gestaltung sichert dabei gebrauchstaugliche und durch die Nutzer akzeptierte mobile MMS. Im Artikel wird eine solche Vorgehensweise in Form eines Leitfadens zur Gestaltung gebrauchstauglicher tangibler MMS (tMMS) präsentiert, der, verortet im Forschungsparadigma der gestaltungsorientierten Forschung (DSR), Wissenschaft und Praxis bei der Gestaltung gebrauchstauglicher tMMS für Anwendungen in Industrie 4.0 umsetzungsnah unterstützen kann. Praktische Relevanz Zur Gestaltung hochgebrauchstauglicher tangibler MMS für mobile Anwendungen im Rahmen von Industrie 4.0 wird ein anwendungsbereiter Leitfaden vorgestellt. Diese strukturierte und methodisch untersetzte Vorgehensweise hilft u. a. Planern und Entwicklern von Produktionsassistenzsystemen bei der Entwicklung und Evaluation von tMMS.AbstractAs a result of the fourth industrial revolution and the increasing networking of machines and humans new human-machine interfaces (HMI), i. e. mobile Production-Assistance-Systems, arise. The design of highly utilizable and user-accepted mobile HMI needs an intersubjective approach. This article describes the development of such a guideline for the design of usable tangible HMI (tHMI), based on Design Science Research (DSR) and using the methods of Usability Engineering. The conceptual proceeding further provides hints for science and practical applications with the goal of designing utilizable tHMI and also gives an outlook regarding further research questions. Practical Relevance This article presents the design of highly utilizable human-machine interfaces for mobile applications within the frame of the internet of things. The methodically structured approach primarilly assists planners and developers of Production Assistance Systems in the design as well as evaluation of tHMI.

[1]  Ernst Andreas Hartmann,et al.  Zukunft der Arbeit in Industrie 4.0 , 2015 .

[2]  A. Twycross.  Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches Creswell John W Sage 320 £29 0761924426 0761924426 [Formula: see text]. , 2004, Nurse researcher.

[3]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Anatomy of a Design Theory , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Aileen Cater-Steel,et al.  A proposal and evaluation of a design method in design science research , 2012 .

[5]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Soft design science methodology , 2009, DESRIST.

[6]  Roman Beck,et al.  Combining Design Science and Design Research Perspectives--Findings of Three Prototyping Projects , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[7]  Boris Otto,et al.  Consortium Research , 2010, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[8]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Systems Development in Information Systems Research , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  P Vink,et al.  Identifying factors of comfort in using hand tools. , 2004, Applied ergonomics.

[10]  L.F.M. Kuijt-Evers,et al.  Comfort predictors for different kinds of hand tools: Differences and similarities , 2007 .

[11]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .

[12]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[13]  Robert Winter,et al.  Design science research in Europe , 2008 .

[14]  Markus Helfert,et al.  A Conceptual Framework to Construct an Artefact for Meta-Abstract Design Knowledge in Design Science Research , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[15]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[16]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  A Framework for Theory Development in Design Science Research: Multiple Perspectives , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[17]  John R. Venable,et al.  The role of theory and theorising in Design Science research , 2006 .

[18]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Action Design Research , 2011, MIS Q..

[19]  Stefan Hrastinski,et al.  Socio-technical IS design science research: developing design theory for IS integration management , 2011, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[20]  Paul Veerkamp,et al.  Modeling Design Process , 1990, AI Mag..

[21]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[22]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  Design Theory in Practice - Making Design Science Research More Transparent , 2011, DESRIST.

[23]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  The Three Cycle View of Design Science , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[24]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[25]  Gregor Harih,et al.  Tool-handle design based on a digital human hand model , 2013 .