Complexity measures in decomposable structures

I n t h i s p a p e r w e p r e s e n t s o m e m e a s u r e s o f c o m p l e x ity of decomposable structures. The literature on complexity is reviewed and then the distinction among different measures of complexity is discussed. At first, a broad definition of complex systems is provided and the main characteristics of such systems are described briefly. In particular, a complex system is defined as a network of many highly interactive and interrelated elements, each performing its own functions. The elements are combined in such a way that each contributes to the behaviour of the structure. Moreover, the system components are characterised by interdependencies that make the contribution of each element to the overall performance (or behaviour) dependent on the contribution of the others. In general, systems are characterised by different degrees of complexity and also by different degree of decomposability. We also discuss the possibility of decomposing such complex systems, recalling the distinction that Simon (1969) made between decomposable, nondecomposable and nearly decomposable structures. Then, two particular kinds of measures are considered. The first group is based on information theory and deals with the concept of entropy. This index refers to the amount of information that we need in order to understand what is happening within a system. We claim that the entropy measure focuses only on the information complexity of a system without taking account of the interdependencies existing among the components. The second group of indicators, instead, explicitly considers this feature. Indeed, the group is composed of indexes - which we call fitness measures - based on the number of relevant relationships within a system. The basic features of Kauffman’s NK model are briefly reviewed. Finally, we discuss the usefulness of both entropy and Kauffman’s K value as appropriate measures of the complexity of decomposable structures.

[1]  G Frizelle,et al.  Measuring complexity as an aid to developing operational strategy , 1995 .

[2]  David D. Yao,et al.  Flexible Parts Routing in Manufacturing Systems , 1990 .

[3]  F. Westhoff,et al.  Complexity, organization, and Stuart Kauffman's The Origins of Order , 1996 .

[4]  Giovanni Dosi,et al.  The structure of problem-solving knowledge and the structure of organisations , 2000 .

[5]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier , 2000 .

[6]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[7]  Niels Henrik Mortensen The Need for Proper Understanding of Modularisation , 2000 .

[8]  David D. Yao,et al.  Material and information flows in flexible manufacturing systems , 1985 .

[9]  Giovanna Devetag,et al.  The imperfect hiding : some introductory concepts and preliminary issues on modularity , 2001 .

[10]  Boaz Ronen,et al.  Improving shop floor control : an entropy model approach , 1992 .

[11]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  ORIGINS OF ORDER , 2019, Origins of Order.

[12]  Luigi Marengo,et al.  Decomposability and modularity of economic interactions , 2001 .

[13]  Koen Frenken,et al.  Modelling the organisation of innovative activity using the NK-model , 2001 .

[14]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Bridging Contested Terrain: Linking Incentive-Based and Learning Perspectives on Organizational Evolution , 2003 .

[15]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[16]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[17]  John M. Olin,et al.  A Knowledge-based Theory of Governance Choice — A Problem-solving Approach , 2001 .

[18]  Daniel A. Levinthal Adaptation on rugged landscapes , 1997 .

[19]  Koen Frenken,et al.  Interdependencies, Nearly-Decomposability and Adaptation , 1999 .

[20]  Scott E. Page,et al.  Two measures of difficulty , 1996 .

[21]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[22]  Moshe M. Barash,et al.  Characteristics of part mix complexity measure for manufacturing systems , 1992, [Proceedings] 1992 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[23]  Boaz Ronen,et al.  An information entropy approach to the small-lot concept , 1994 .

[24]  Anthony Dardis,et al.  Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research. , 1995 .

[25]  Janet Efstathiou,et al.  Applying and assessing two methods for measuring complexity in manufacturing , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[26]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[27]  Cognition, institutions, near decomposability : rethinking Herbert Simon's contribution , 2002 .

[28]  Enzo Rullani,et al.  Il management e le macchine , 1990 .

[29]  S. Kauffman At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity , 1995 .

[30]  G. Dosi,et al.  PROBLEM-SOLVING BEHAVIOURS, ORGANISATIONAL FORMS AND THE COMPLEXITY OF TASKS , 2000 .

[31]  R. Langlois Modularity in technology and organization , 2002 .

[32]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Landscape Design: Designing for Local Action in Complex Worlds , 1999 .

[33]  Moshe M. Barash,et al.  Complexity in manufacturing systems, Part 1: Analysis of static complexity , 1998 .

[34]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  The Mathematical Theory of Communication , 1950 .

[35]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  The Option Value of Modularity in Design: An Example From Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .