A Study of Tradeoffs in Scheduling Terminal-Area Operations

The terminal area surrounding an airport is an important component of the air transportation system, and efficient terminal-area schedules are essential for accommodating the projected increase in air traffic demand. Aircraft arrival schedules are subject to a variety of operational constraints, such as minimum separation for safety, required arrival time-windows, limited deviation from a first-come first-served sequence, and precedence constraints. There is also a range of objectives associated with multiple stakeholders that could be optimized in these schedules; the associated tradeoffs are evaluated in this paper. A dynamic programming algorithm for determining the minimum cost arrival schedule, given aircraft-dependent delay costs, is presented. The proposed approach makes it possible to determine various tradeoffs in terminal-area operations. A comparison of maximum throughput and minimum average delay schedules shows that the benefit from maximizing throughput could be at the expense of an increase in average delay, and that minimizing delay is the more advantageous of the two objectives in most cases. A comprehensive analysis of the tradeoffs between throughput and fuel costs and throughput and operating costs is conducted, accounting for both the cost of delay (as reported by the airlines) and the cost of speeding up when possible (from models of aircraft performance).

[1]  Harilaos N. Psaraftis,et al.  A Dynamic Programming Approach for Sequencing Groups of Identical Jobs , 1980, Oper. Res..

[2]  Roger George Dear The dynamic scheduling of aircraft in the near terminal area , 1976 .

[3]  Dionyssios A. Trivizas Optimal Scheduling with Maximum Position Shift (MPS) Constraints: A Runway Scheduling Application , 1998, Journal of Navigation.

[4]  Heinz Erzberger,et al.  AIRLINE ARRIVAL PRIORITIZATION IN SEQUENCING AND SCHEDULING , 1998 .

[5]  B. Chandran,et al.  A Dynamic Programming Algorithm for Robust Runway Scheduling , 2007, 2007 American Control Conference.

[6]  John-Paul Clarke,et al.  A Conceptual Design of A Departure Planner Decision Aid , 2000 .

[7]  Francis R. Carr,et al.  Robust decision-support tools for airport surface traffic , 2004 .

[8]  R. A. Slattery Terminal area trajectory synthesis for air traffic control automation , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 American Control Conference - ACC'95.

[9]  Heinz Erzberger,et al.  Design of Center-TRACON Automation System , 1993 .

[10]  Heinz Erzberger,et al.  ANALYSIS OF SEQUENCING AND SCHEDULING METHODS FOR ARRIVAL TRAFFIC , 1990 .

[11]  Yosef S. Sherif,et al.  AN ALGORITHM FOR COMPUTER ASSISTED SEQUENCING AND SCHEDULING OF TERMINAL AREA OPERATIONS , 1991 .

[12]  Chris Brinton,et al.  CONCEPT DESCRIPTION AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE SURFACE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. , 2002 .

[13]  David Abramson,et al.  Scheduling Aircraft Landings - The Static Case , 2000, Transp. Sci..

[14]  Heinz Erzberger,et al.  Analysis of delay reducing and fuel saving sequencing and spacing algorithms for arrival traffic , 1991 .

[15]  S. C. Mohleji,et al.  Use of the departure enhanced planning and runway/taxiway assignment system (DEPARTS) for optimal departure scheduling at busy airports , 2002, Proceedings. The 21st Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[16]  Hamsa Balakrishnan,et al.  Scheduling Aircraft Landings under Constrained Position Shifting , 2006 .

[17]  D. Böhme,et al.  Tactical Departure Management with the Eurocontrol/DLR DMAN , 2005 .

[18]  John-Paul Clarke,et al.  Runway Operations Planning and Control: Sequencing and Scheduling , 2001 .

[19]  Bala G. Chandran,et al.  EFFICIENT AND EQUITABLE DEPARTURE SCHEDULING IN REAL-TIME : NEW APPROACHES TO OLD PROBLEMS , 2007 .

[20]  Amedeo R. Odoni,et al.  Landings at Logan Airport: Describing and Increasing Airport Capacity , 1993, Transp. Sci..