Governing health data across changing contexts: A focus group study of citizen's views in England, Iceland, and Sweden

BACKGROUND The governance structures associated with health data are evolving in response to advances in digital technologies that enable new ways of capturing, using, and sharing different types of data. Increasingly, health data moves between different contexts such as from healthcare to research, or to commerce and marketing. Crossing these contextual boundaries has the potential to violate societal expectations about the appropriate use of health data and diminish public trust. Understanding citizens' views on the acceptability of and preferences for data use in different contexts is essential for developing information governance policies in these new contexts. METHODS Focus group design presenting data sharing scenarios in England, Iceland, and Sweden. RESULTS Seventy-one participants were recruited. Participants supported the need for data to help understand the observable world, improve medical research, the quality of public services, and to benefit society. However, participants consistently identified the lack of information, transparency and control as barriers to trusting organisations to use data in a way that they considered appropriate. There was considerable support for fair and transparent data sharing practices where all parties benefitted. CONCLUSION Data governance policy should involve all stakeholders' perspectives on an ongoing basis, to inform and implement changes to health data sharing practices that accord with stakeholder views. The Findings showed that (1) data should be used for ethical purposes even when there was commercial interest; (2) data subjects and/or public institutions that provide and share data should also receive benefits from the sharing of data; (3) third parties use of data requires greater transparency and accountability than currently exists, (4) there should be greater information provided to empower data subjects.

[1]  W H Isbister,et al.  Qualitative research in health care , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  Cicely Marston,et al.  Patient and public views about the security and privacy of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) in the UK: results from a mixed methods study , 2015, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[3]  J. Gulcher,et al.  An Icelandic saga on a centralized healthcare database and democratic decision making , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.

[4]  Cicely Marston,et al.  Patient and public attitudes towards informed consent models and levels of awareness of Electronic Health Records in the UK , 2015, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[5]  H. Nissenbaum Privacy as contextual integrity , 2004 .

[6]  Tobias Dehling,et al.  Exploring the Far Side of Mobile Health: Information Security and Privacy of Mobile Health Apps on iOS and Android , 2015, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[7]  L. Andrews,et al.  Privacy Policies of Android Diabetes Apps and Sharing of Health Information. , 2016, JAMA.

[8]  Richard J. Whiddett,et al.  Patients' attitudes towards sharing their health information , 2006, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[9]  K. Devers,et al.  Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. , 2007, Health services research.

[10]  Hetan Shah The DeepMind debacle demands dialogue on data , 2017, Nature.

[11]  Jinyan Zang,et al.  Who Knows What About Me? A Survey of Behind the Scenes Personal Data Sharing to Third Parties by Mobile Apps , 2015 .

[12]  Tasha Glenn,et al.  Privacy in the Digital World: Medical and Health Data Outside of HIPAA Protections , 2014, Current Psychiatry Reports.

[14]  Ali Sunyaev,et al.  Availability and quality of mobile health app privacy policies , 2015, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[15]  Lucila Ohno-Machado,et al.  Data governance requirements for distributed clinical research networks: triangulating perspectives of diverse stakeholders , 2014, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[16]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  Privacy in Context , 2009 .

[17]  Neil Robinson,et al.  Public preferences for electronic health data storage, access, and sharing — evidence from a pan-European survey , 2016, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[18]  Elin C. Lehnbom,et al.  A Qualitative Study of Swedes' Opinions about Shared Electronic Health Records , 2013, MedInfo.

[19]  C. Stewart,et al.  Big Data and Public-Private Partnerships in Healthcare and Research , 2019, Asian Bioethics Review.

[20]  Eric J Topol,et al.  Can mobile health technologies transform health care? , 2013, JAMA.

[21]  John Torous,et al.  The Complexity of Mental Health App Privacy Policies: A Potential Barrier to Privacy , 2018, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[22]  Louise Barkhuus The mismeasurement of privacy: using contextual integrity to reconsider privacy in HCI , 2012, CHI.

[23]  Edgar A. Whitley,et al.  Patient Perspectives on Sharing Anonymized Personal Health Data Using a Digital System for Dynamic Consent and Research Feedback: A Qualitative Study , 2016, Journal of medical Internet research.

[24]  Ralph Holz,et al.  Data sharing practices of medicines related apps and the mobile ecosystem: traffic, content, and network analysis , 2019, BMJ.

[25]  Irina Shklovski,et al.  Leakiness and creepiness in app space: perceptions of privacy and mobile app use , 2014, CHI.

[26]  B. Knoppers,et al.  International mHealth Research: Old Tools and New Challenges , 2020, The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[27]  G. Lauss,et al.  From Protection of Privacy to Control of Data Streams: A Focus Group Study on Biobanks in the Information Society , 2012, Public Health Genomics.

[28]  Klaus Hoeyer,et al.  Dangers of the digital fit: Rethinking seamlessness and social sustainability in data-intensive healthcare , 2018, Big Data Soc..

[29]  H. Nissenbaum A Contextual Approach to Privacy Online , 2011, Daedalus.

[30]  Dominique Peyrat-Guillard,et al.  Cultural and generational influences on privacy concerns: a qualitative study in seven European countries , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Walter Ricciardi,et al.  Benefits and challenges of Big Data in healthcare: an overview of the European initiatives , 2019, European journal of public health.

[32]  K. Hoeyer,et al.  A review of attitudes towards the reuse of health data among people in the European Union: The primacy of purpose and the common good , 2019, Health policy.

[33]  W. Burke,et al.  If you build it, they will come: unintended future uses of organised health data collections , 2016, BMC Medical Ethics.

[34]  S. Kalkman,et al.  Patients’ and public views and attitudes towards the sharing of health data for research: a narrative review of the empirical evidence , 2019, Journal of Medical Ethics.