Existence of Hierarchies and Human's Pursuit of Top Hierarchy Lead to Power Law

The power law is ubiquitous in natural and social phenomena, and is considered as a universal relationship between the frequency and its rank for diverse social systems. However, a general model is still lacking to interpret why these seemingly unrelated systems share great similarity. Through a detailed analysis of natural language texts and simulation experiments based on the proposed 'Hierarchical Selection Model', we found that the existence of hierarchies and human's pursuit of top hierarchy lead to the power law. Further, the power law is a statistical and emergent performance of hierarchies, and it is the universality of hierarchies that contributes to the ubiquity of the power law.

[1]  Sebastian Bernhardsson,et al.  Zipf's law unzipped , 2011, ArXiv.

[2]  James H. Brown,et al.  A General Model for the Origin of Allometric Scaling Laws in Biology , 1997, Science.

[3]  Michael Mitzenmacher,et al.  A Brief History of Generative Models for Power Law and Lognormal Distributions , 2004, Internet Math..

[4]  R. Ferrer i Cancho,et al.  The variation of Zipf's law in human language , 2005 .

[5]  G. Cocho,et al.  Universality of Rank-Ordering Distributions in the Arts and Sciences , 2009, PloS one.

[6]  G. Neukum,et al.  Crater Size Distributions and Impact Probabilities on Earth from Lunar, Terrestrial Planeta, and Asteroid Cratering Data , 1994 .

[7]  D. Turcotte,et al.  Fractality and Self-Organized Criticality of Wars , 1998 .

[8]  Christopher T. Kello,et al.  Scaling laws in cognitive sciences , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  George Kingsley Zipf,et al.  Human behavior and the principle of least effort , 1949 .

[10]  D. Sornette,et al.  Rank‐ordering statistics of extreme events: Application to the distribution of large earthquakes , 1995, cond-mat/9510035.

[11]  A. Goldberg.  Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure , 1995 .

[12]  H. Simon,et al.  The Organization of Complex Systems , 1977 .

[13]  C. Fillmore,et al.  Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What's X doing Y? construction , 1999 .

[14]  D. Zanette,et al.  Vertical transmission of culture and the distribution of family names. , 2000, nlin/0009046.

[15]  B. Corominas-Murtra,et al.  Universality of Zipf's law. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[16]  H. Stanley,et al.  Modelling urban growth patterns , 1995, Nature.

[17]  Bikas K. Chakrabarti,et al.  Kinetic exchange models for income and wealth distributions , 2007, 0709.1543.

[18]  S. Redner.  How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution , 1998, cond-mat/9804163.

[19]  H. Stanley,et al.  On the Size Distribution of Business Firms , 2008 .

[20]  Gabriel Altmann,et al.  Zipf’s law—another view , 2010 .

[21]  R. Axtell.  Zipf Distribution of U.S. Firm Sizes , 2001, Science.

[22]  Richard D. Deveaux,et al.  Applied Smoothing Techniques for Data Analysis , 1999, Technometrics.

[23]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The Nature of Markets in the World Wide Web , 1999 .

[24]  D J PRICE,et al.  NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS. , 1965, Science.

[25]  G. Yule,et al.  Some Statistics of Evolution and Geographical Distribution in Plants and Animals, and their Significance. , 1922, Nature.

[26]  V. Plerou,et al.  A theory of power-law distributions in financial market fluctuations , 2003, Nature.

[27]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Size Distribution of Business Firms , 1958 .

[28]  M. Tomasello.  Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone , 2003 .

[29]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[30]  Gabriel Altmann,et al.  Zipf's mean and language typology , 2008, Glottometrics.

[31]  孙继山.  The Power of Design , 2019, Puppetry in Theatre and Arts Education.