Timid choices and bold forecasts: a cognitive perspective on risk taking

Decision makers have a strong tendency to consider problems as unique. They isolate the current choice from future opportunities and neglect the statistics of the past in evaluating current plans. Overly cautious attitudes to risk result from a failure to appreciate the effects of statistical aggregation in mitigating relative risk. Overly optimistic forecasts result from the adoption of an inside view of the problem, which anchors predictions on plans and scenarios. The conflicting biases are documented in psychological research. Possible implications for decision making in organizations are examined.

[1]  G. Gigerenzer,et al.  Probabilistic mental models: a Brunswikian theory of confidence. , 1991, Psychological review.

[2]  E. A. Lowe,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF MANAGERIAL BIASING: EVIDENCE FROM A COMPANY'S BUDGETING PROCESS , 1968 .

[3]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[4]  E. Lawler,et al.  Information and control in organizations , 1978 .

[5]  L. Tiger.  Optimism: The Biology of Hope , 1979 .

[6]  J. Harrison,et al.  Decision Making and Postdecision Surprises. , 1984 .

[7]  R. Abrams,et al.  Psychological sources of ambiguity avoidance , 1986 .

[8]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  Accountability amplifies the status quo effect when change creates victims , 1994 .

[9]  M. O'hare,et al.  Searching for Safety , 1990 .

[10]  A. Tversky,et al.  Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment , 1983 .

[11]  Philip Bromiley,et al.  Corporate Capital Investment: A Behavioral Approach , 1986 .

[12]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[14]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  Challenger: Fine-Tuning the Odds Until Something Breaks , 1988 .

[15]  A. Tversky,et al.  Rational choice and the framing of decisions , 1990 .

[16]  William Samuelson,et al.  Status quo bias in decision making , 1988 .

[17]  J. Meindl,et al.  Corporate attributions as strategic illusions of management control. , 1984 .

[18]  Carolyn Y. Woo,et al.  Entrepreneurs' perceived chances for success , 1988 .

[19]  Christopher W. Myers,et al.  Understanding cost growth and performance shortfalls in pioneer process plants , 1981 .

[20]  A. Tversky,et al.  The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  A. Tversky,et al.  Intuitive Prediction: Biases and Corrective Procedures , 1982 .

[22]  Amos Tversky,et al.  Risk: The Long and the Short. , 1983 .

[23]  David M. Kreps.  Static choice in the presence of unforeseen contingencies , 1992 .

[24]  Roy L. Crum,et al.  Managerial Risk Preferences for Below-Target Returns , 1980 .

[25]  H. Thomas,et al.  Attitudes Toward Risk and The Risk–Return Paradox: Prospect Theory Explanations , 1988 .

[26]  R. Roll,et al.  The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers , 1986 .

[27]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the psychology of prediction , 1973 .

[28]  D. Wehrung.  Risk taking over gains and losses: A study of oil executives , 1989 .

[29]  E. C. Capen,et al.  Competitive Bidding in High-Risk Situations , 1971 .

[30]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Understanding Behavior in Escalation Situations , 1989, Science.

[31]  T. S. Bateman,et al.  The psychological context of strategic decisions: A model and convergent experimental findings , 1989 .

[32]  近藤 恭正,et al.  Control Systems in Organizations , 1979 .

[33]  A. Tversky,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .

[34]  Joel Huber,et al.  An Investigation of the Rationality of Consumer Valuations of Multiple Health Risks , 1987 .

[35]  Max H. Bazerman,et al.  The Role of Perspective-Taking Ability in Negotiating under Different Forms of Arbitration , 1983 .

[36]  D. Davis,et al.  New Projects : Beware of False Economies : Harvard Business Review , 1987 .

[37]  Timothy W. Ruefli,et al.  Mean-Variance Approaches to Risk-Return Relationships in Strategy: Paradox Lost , 1990 .

[38]  Donald A. Redelmeier,et al.  On the Framing of Multiple Prospects , 1992 .

[39]  J. March,et al.  Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking , 1987 .

[40]  P. Samuelson.  Risk and uncertainty: a fallacy of large numbers , 1963 .

[41]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Calibration of probabilities: the state of the art to 1980 , 1982 .

[42]  Charles R. Schwenk,et al.  Conjectures on Cognitive Simplification in Acquisition and Divestment Decision Making , 1985 .

[43]  Chezy Ofir,et al.  Effects of cue consistency and value on base-rate utilization. , 1989 .

[44]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[45]  R. Zeckhauser,et al.  The Effect of the Timing of Consumption Decisions and the Resolution of Lotteries on the Choice of Lotteries , 1972 .

[46]  William Samuelson,et al.  I Won the Auction But Don't Want the Prize , 1983 .

[47]  J. Kagan,et al.  Rational choice in an uncertain world , 1988 .

[48]  Mean-Variance Approaches to Risk-Return Relationships in Strategy , 1990 .

[49]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Venture Theory: A Model of Decision Weights , 1990 .

[50]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias , 1991 .

[51]  Lola L. Lopes.  Decision Making in the Short Run. , 1981 .

[52]  P. Fishburn,et al.  TWO‐PIECE VON NEUMANN‐MORGENSTERN UTILITY FUNCTIONS* , 1979 .

[53]  Dean E. Hewes.  eview of D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, &A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases , 1983 .

[54]  Avi Fiegenbaum.  Prospect theory and the risk-return association : An empirical examination in 85 industries , 1990 .