Using Soft Constraints to Interpret Descriptions of Shapes

The contribution of this paper is to test different models that correctly interpret descriptions of shapes provided by web-users and are able to select which object is being described by them in a language game, a game in which one user describes a selected object of those composing the scene (see figure 1), while another user has to guess which object has been described (see figure 2). The given description needs to be non ambiguous and accurate enough to allow other users to guess the described shape correctly. The descriptions need to be parsed to extract the syntax and the words' classes used, and to interpret the semantics of them. We have modeled the meaning of these descriptions by means of soft constraints, which represent the meaning of words, and an aggregation function which combine the meanings of the words into the meaning of the description. We have proven that if we use the syntax to detect whether a description is simple or complex (those referring to two or more objects) the system can learn better semantic models and improve the results, increasing the precision from 79% to 81%, the recall from 34% to 58% and the f-measure from 48% to 68%.

[1]  L. Wittgenstein The Blue and Brown Books , 1958 .

[2]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-III , 1975, Inf. Sci..

[3]  Cezary Z. Janikow,et al.  Fuzzy decision trees: issues and methods , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[4]  Luc Steels,et al.  Aibo''s first words. the social learning of language and meaning. Evolution of Communication , 2002 .

[5]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  A New Direction in AI: Toward a Computational Theory of Perceptions , 2001, AI Mag..

[6]  Luc Steels,et al.  Language games for autonomous robots , 2001 .

[7]  Deb K. Roy,et al.  Learning visually grounded words and syntax for a scene description task , 2002, Comput. Speech Lang..

[8]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Learning words from sights and sounds: a computational model , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[9]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Computing with Words and Perceptions - A Paradigm Shift , 2009, PDPTA.

[10]  Deb Roy,et al.  Grounded Semantic Composition for Visual Scenes , 2011, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[11]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Precisiated Natural Language (PNL) , 2004, AI Mag..

[12]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Toward a generalized theory of uncertainty (GTU) - an outline , 2005, GrC.

[13]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Toward a generalized theory of uncertainty (GTU)--an outline , 2005, Inf. Sci..

[14]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  From Computing with Numbers to Computing with Words - from Manipulation of Measurements to Manipulation of Perceptions , 2005, Logic, Thought and Action.

[15]  Sergio Guadarrama,et al.  What about fuzzy logic's linguistic soundness? , 2005, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[16]  D. Roy Grounding words in perception and action: computational insights , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Sergio Guadarrama,et al.  On Fuzzy Set Theories , 2007 .

[18]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  A New Frontier in Computation-Computation with Information Described in Natural Language , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing.

[19]  S. Guadarrama Concept-Analyzer : A tool for analyzing fuzzy concepts , 2008 .

[20]  Hans-Hellmut Nagel,et al.  Conceptual representations between video signals and natural language descriptions , 2008, Image Vis. Comput..

[21]  Sergio Guadarrama,et al.  Computing with Actions: the case of driving a car in a simulated car race , 2009, IFSA/EUSFLAT Conf..

[22]  E. Trillas On a Model for the Meaning of Predicates – A Naïve Approach to the Genesis of Fuzzy Sets , 2009 .

[23]  Dan Klein,et al.  Learning Semantic Correspondences with Less Supervision , 2009, ACL.

[24]  David P. Pancho,et al.  Syntax learning for the description of scenes composed of geometric shapes , 2010, International Conference on Fuzzy Systems.

[25]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  What Computing with Words Means to Me [Discussion Forum] , 2010, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.