Workplace assessments and functional capacity evaluations: current practices of therapists in Australia.

UNLABELLED The literature has focused predominantly on functional capacity evaluations and related clinic-based assessments, however, there is little that examines workplace-based assessment approaches. In Australia, rehabilitation of injured workers occurs in the workplace wherever possible, and it is expected that workplace-based services will increase elsewhere in the future. There is a lack of knowledge, however, of therapists' current practices regarding workplace- and clinic-based work-related assessments. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to understand the current practice of therapists in Australia who are directly involved in conducting work-related assessments. STUDY DESIGN A naturalistic inquiry approach was utilised for this study. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 occupational therapists and physiotherapists representing a spread of geographical locations, organisations, and experience. FINDINGS Participants described three major types of work-related assessments - workplace assessments, functional capacity evaluations (job) and functional capacity evaluations (no job). The types, purposes, and characteristics of work-related assessments were described and influences and constraints identified. Participants described using processes, data sources, methods of data collection and analysis consistent with qualitative methods, although some quantitative methods were also employed. CONCLUSION The findings suggest that the further a work-related assessment moves away from the actual work environment and requirements of a specific job, the greater its level of standardisation and generalisability. Conversely, when work-related assessments occur in the actual work environment, qualitative processes are used, and results are specific and non-generalisable.

[1]  Elizabeth DePoy,et al.  Introduction to Research: Understanding and Applying Multiple Strategies , 1998 .

[2]  Leonard N. Matheson,et al.  A Test to Measure Lift Capacity of Physically Impaired Adults Part 1—Development and Reliability Testing , 1995, Spine.

[3]  L. Gibson,et al.  A review of functional capacity evaluation practice. , 1997, Work.

[4]  K. Straaton,et al.  Reliability and validity of a newly developed test of physical work performance. , 1994, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[5]  J. Creswell Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. , 1998 .

[6]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[7]  P M King,et al.  A critical review of functional capacity evaluations. , 1998, Physical therapy.

[8]  Leon Straker,et al.  Validity of work-related assessments. , 1999, Work.

[9]  Reviewing Qualitative Research: Proposed Criteria for Fairness and Rigor , 1994 .

[10]  Y. Bhambhani,et al.  The Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment Work Simulator: reliability and validity at three work intensities. , 1991, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  T M Khalil,et al.  Process analysis of functional capacity assessment. , 1996, Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation.

[12]  J. R. Boston,et al.  Functional capacity assessment: Influence of behavioral and environmental factors. , 1996, Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation.

[13]  P. King,et al.  Work rehabilitation programs: a 1997 survey. , 1999, Work.

[14]  L. Krefting Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness. , 1991, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[15]  D. Hart,et al.  Reliability of independent observer judgments of level of lift effort in a kinesiophysical Functional Capacity Evaluation. , 1999, Work.

[16]  E. Innes Workplace-based occupational rehabilitation in New South Wales, Australia. , 1995, Work.

[17]  L. Straker,et al.  A clinician's guide to work-related assessments: 1 - purposes and problems. , 1998, Work.

[18]  Gavin Wood,et al.  Rehabilitation programs and return to work outcomes , 1995 .

[19]  Incorporation of ethnographic methods in occupational therapy assessment. , 1993, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[20]  L. Straker,et al.  A clinician's guide to work-related assessments: 2 - design problems. , 1998, Work.

[21]  R. Lysaght Job analysis in occupational therapy: stepping into the complex world of business and industry. , 1997, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[22]  S. Vasudevan Role of functional capacity assessment in disability evaluation. , 1996, Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation.

[23]  S J Isernhagen,et al.  Guidelines for functional capacity evaluation of people with medical conditions. , 1993, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[24]  D. Lechner Functional Capacity Evaluation , 1998 .

[25]  L. Straker,et al.  A clinician's guide to work-related assessments: 3 - Administration and interpretation problems. , 1998, Work.

[26]  Leon Straker,et al.  Reliability of work-related assessments. , 1999, Work.

[27]  R. Steele Rosomoff,et al.  Functional capacity assessment. , 1996, Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation.