Optical signatures of auroral arcs produced by field line resonances: comparison with satellite observations and modeling

Abstract. We show two examples from the CANOPUS array of the optical signatures of auroral arcs produced by field line resonances on the night of 31 January 1997. The first example occurs during local evening at about 18:00 MLT (Magnetic Local Time), where CANOPUS meridian scanning photometer data show all the classic features of field line resonances. There are two, near-monochromatic resonances (at approximately 2.0 and 2.5 mHz) and both show latitudinal peaks in amplitude with an approximately 180 degree latitudinal phase shift across the maximum. The second field line resonance event occurs closer to local midnight, between approximately 22:00 and 22:40 MLT. Magnetometer and optical data show that the field line resonance has a very low frequency, near 1.3 mHz. All-sky imager data from CANOPUS show that in this event the field line resonances produce auroral arcs with westward propagation, with arc widths of about 10 km. Electron energies are on the order of 1 keV. This event was also seen in data from the FAST satellite (Lotko et al., 1998), and we compare our observations with those of Lotko et al. (1998). A remarkable feature of this field line resonance is that the latitudinal phase shift was substantially greater than 180 degrees. In our discussion, we present a model of field line resonances which accounts for the dominant physical effects and which is in good agreement with the observations. We emphasize three points. First, the low frequency of the field line resonance in the second event is likely due to the stretched topology of the magnetotail field lines, with the field line resonance on field lines threading the earthward edge of the plasma sheet. Second, the latitudinal phase structure may indicate dispersive effects due to electron trapping or finite ion gyroradius. Third, we show that a nonlocal conductivity model can easily explain the parallel electric fields and the precipitating electron energies seen in the field line resonance. Key words. Magnetospheric physics (electric fields; energetic particles precipitating; current systems)

[1]  R. Lysak,et al.  Generation of field‐aligned currents in the near‐Earth magnetotail , 2001 .

[2]  V. Tikhonchuk,et al.  Shear AlfvéN waves on stretched magnetic field lines near midnight in Earth's magnetosphere , 2000 .

[3]  V. Tikhonchuk,et al.  Electron kinetic effects in standing shear Alfvén waves in the dipolar magnetosphere , 2000 .

[4]  V. Tikhonchuk,et al.  Parallel electric fields in dispersive shear Alfvén waves in the dipolar magnetosphere , 1999 .

[5]  V. Tikhonchuk,et al.  Discrete Auroral Arcs and Nonlinear Dispersive Field Line Resonances , 1999 .

[6]  V. Tikhonchuk,et al.  Auroral density fluctuations on dispersive field line resonances , 1999 .

[7]  A. Streltsov,et al.  Discrete auroral arc, electrostatic shock and suprathermal electrons powered by dispersive, anomalously resistive field line resonance , 1998 .

[8]  V. Tikhonchuk,et al.  Nonlinear field line resonances: Dispersive effects , 1998 .

[9]  J. G. Watzin,et al.  The Fast Auroral SnapshoT (FAST) Mission , 1998 .

[10]  S. Wing,et al.  Characterizing the state of the magnetosphere: Testing the ion precipitation maxima latitude (b2i) and the ion isotropy boundary , 1998 .

[11]  J. Samson,et al.  Variation of plasmatrough density derived from magnetospheric field line resonances , 1996 .

[12]  Nikolai A. Tsyganenko,et al.  Effects of the solar wind conditions on the global magnetospheric configuration as deduced from data-based field models , 1996 .

[13]  L. Cogger,et al.  Observations of field line resonances, auroral arcs, and auroral vortex structures , 1996 .

[14]  A. G. McNamara,et al.  Canopus — A ground-based instrument array for remote sensing the high latitude ionosphere during the ISTP/GGS program , 1995 .

[15]  A. Chan,et al.  Anisotropic Alfvén‐ballooning modes in Earth's magnetosphere , 1994 .

[16]  V. Sergeev,et al.  Testing the isotropic boundary algorithm method to evaluate the magnetic field configuration in the tail , 1993 .

[17]  Joseph E. Borovsky,et al.  Auroral arc thicknesses as predicted by various theories , 1993 .

[18]  F. Creutzberg,et al.  Proton aurora and substorm intensifications , 1992 .

[19]  J. Samson,et al.  Formation of the stable auroral arc that intensifies at substorm onset , 1992 .

[20]  J. M. Ruohoniemi,et al.  Field line resonances associated with MHD waveguides in the magnetosphere , 1992 .

[21]  G. Atkinson Mechanism by which merging at X lines causes discrete auroral arcs , 1992 .

[22]  J. M. Ruohoniemi,et al.  HF radar observations of Pc 5 field line resonances in the midnight/early morning MLT sector , 1991 .

[23]  R. Lundin,et al.  Pc 5 pulsations in the outer dawn magnetosphere seen by ISEE 1 and 2 , 1990 .

[24]  M. Kivelson,et al.  Coupling of global magnetospheric MHD eigenmodes to field line resonances , 1986 .

[25]  C. Goertz Kinetic Alfven waves on auroral field lines , 1984 .

[26]  T. Antonsen,et al.  Kinetic equations for low frequency instabilities in inhomogeneous plasmas , 1980 .

[27]  J. Lemaire,et al.  Relationship between auroral electrons fluxes and field aligned electric potential difference , 1980 .

[28]  M. Schulz,et al.  Self‐consistent particle and parallel electrostatic field distributions in the magnetospheric‐ionospheric auroral region , 1978 .

[29]  J. Samson,et al.  Theory and observation of auroral substorms: A magnetohydrodynamic approach , 1995 .