Eight years after its inception, the Kyoto protocol finally entered into force on February 16, 2005. In this respect, it is imperative to explore different greenhouse gas (GHGs) emissions reduction options in developing countries under the framework of Kyoto protocol. A number of analyses reveal that half of the global emission reductions can be achieved by substituting fossil fuel by non-fossil fuel (e.g., nuclear and renewable energy) sources for electric power generation. Pricing policies are more likely to achieve such a substitution resulting in a significant CO2 emissions reduction. For this, a carbon emission penalty on fossil fuel based generation is one of the mechanisms of pricing carbon emissions. Imposing a carbon emission penalty on the fossil fuel generation enhances renewable based energy generation to substitute carbon intensive power generation. This effect is called the "substitution effect". The corollary effect of imposing emission penalties on fossil fuel generating plants will be an increase in the average electricity price. This, in turn, will decrease the energy demand from customers due to the negative price elasticity of electricity demand. This effect is called the "price effect". This paper examines the substitution and price effect of carbon emission penalties on fossil fuel generation in mitigating CO2 emissions from distributed generations (DGs) in a developing country. Also discussed will be the costs and benefits of emission penalties as well as other policy options in mitigating environmental emissions from the renewable based DG resources, such as wind, biomass, and PVs
[1]
Peter Hoeller,et al.
Energy Prices, Taxes and Carbon Dioxide Emissions
,
1991
.
[2]
S. Smith,et al.
Using taxes to price externalities: experiences in Western Europe
,
1994
.
[3]
Noriyuki Goto,et al.
Macroeconomic and sectoral impacts of carbon taxation: A case for the Japanese economy
,
1995
.
[4]
Ram M. Shrestha,et al.
Environmental and electricity planning implications of carbon tax and technological constraints in a developing country
,
1998
.
[5]
R. Bose,et al.
Elasticities of electricity demand in India
,
1999
.
[6]
N. Wohlgemuth,et al.
Power sector reform and distributed generation in sub-Saharan Africa
,
2001
.
[7]
John Bower,et al.
An Economic Evaluation of Small-scale Distributed Electricity Generation Technologies
,
2004
.
[8]
S. Pachauri,et al.
Elasticities of electricity demand in urban Indian households
,
2004
.
[9]
David G. Victor,et al.
Impact of Power Sector Reforms on Technology, Efficiency and Emissions: Case Study of Gujarat, India
,
2004
.
[10]
Les Oxley,et al.
Reducing carbon emissions? The relative effectiveness of different types of environmental tax: the case of New Zealand
,
2005,
Environ. Model. Softw..
[11]
Rangan Banerjee,et al.
Comparison of options for distributed generation in India
,
2006
.