A new Kriging-based DoE strategy and its application to structural reliability analysis

As the numerical model of engineering structure becomes more and more complicated and time consuming, efficient structural reliability analysis is badly in need. To reduce the number of calls to the performance function and iterative times during structural reliability analysis, an innovative strategy of the design of experiments (DoE) called Isomap-Clustering strategy is proposed. According to the statistical information provided by Kriging, points with the worst uncertainty for reliability analysis are on the estimated limit state. Therefore, by combining Isomap and k-means clustering algorithm, Isomap-Clustering strategy refreshes the DoE of the Kriging model with a few representative points in the vicinity of the estimated limit state each iteration and iteratively “pushes” the estimated limit state to the real one until a stopping condition is satisfied. By employing the proposed DoE strategy and sparse polynomial-Kriging model, a structural reliability analysis method is constructed, whose stopping criterion is defined by derivation. Three examples are studied. Results show that the proposed method can lower the number of calls to the performance function and remarkably reduces the iterations of structural reliability analysis.

[1]  J. Richard,et al.  Efficient high-dimensional importance sampling , 2007 .

[2]  Jérôme Morio,et al.  A survey of rare event simulation methods for static input-output models , 2014, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[3]  B. Sudret,et al.  An adaptive algorithm to build up sparse polynomial chaos expansions for stochastic finite element analysis , 2010 .

[4]  M. Eldred,et al.  Efficient Global Reliability Analysis for Nonlinear Implicit Performance Functions , 2008 .

[5]  Irfan Kaymaz,et al.  Application Of Kriging Method To Structural Reliability Problems , 2005 .

[6]  Pan Wang,et al.  A new learning function for Kriging and its applications to solve reliability problems in engineering , 2015, Comput. Math. Appl..

[7]  Yi Gao,et al.  An active learning kriging model for hybrid reliability analysis with both random and interval variables , 2015 .

[8]  N. Gayton,et al.  CQ2RS: a new statistical approach to the response surface method for reliability analysis , 2003 .

[9]  KersaudyPierric,et al.  A new surrogate modeling technique combining Kriging and polynomial chaos expansions - Application to uncertainty analysis in computational dosimetry , 2015 .

[10]  Jian Wang,et al.  LIF: A new Kriging based learning function and its application to structural reliability analysis , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[11]  Zhili Sun,et al.  A hybrid algorithm for reliability analysis combining Kriging and subset simulation importance sampling , 2015 .

[12]  G. Ricciardi,et al.  A new sampling strategy for SVM-based response surface for structural reliability analysis , 2015 .

[13]  Nicolas Gayton,et al.  A combined Importance Sampling and Kriging reliability method for small failure probabilities with time-demanding numerical models , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  Behnaam Aazhang,et al.  A Class of Optimum Improtance Sampling Strategies , 1995, Inf. Sci..

[15]  Colas Schretter,et al.  Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods , 2016 .

[16]  Yan-Gang Zhao,et al.  A general procedure for ® rst / second-order reliability method ( FORM / SORM ) , 1999 .

[17]  Ying Xiong,et al.  A double weighted stochastic response surface method for reliability analysis , 2012 .

[18]  Â. Teixeira,et al.  Assessment of the efficiency of Kriging surrogate models for structural reliability analysis , 2014 .

[19]  G. Matheron The intrinsic random functions and their applications , 1973, Advances in Applied Probability.

[20]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Least angle regression , 2004, math/0406456.

[21]  J. Beck,et al.  Estimation of Small Failure Probabilities in High Dimensions by Subset Simulation , 2001 .

[22]  Yishang Zhang,et al.  Probability and convex set hybrid reliability analysis based on active learning Kriging model , 2015 .

[23]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Meta-model-based importance sampling for reliability sensitivity analysis , 2014 .

[24]  Thomas Most,et al.  A comparison of approximate response functions in structural reliability analysis , 2008 .

[25]  Michel Salaün,et al.  A new adaptive response surface method for reliability analysis , 2013 .

[26]  Jian Li,et al.  Doubly weighted moving least squares and its application to structural reliability analysis , 2012 .

[27]  L. Schueremans,et al.  Benefit of splines and neural networks in simulation based structural reliability analysis , 2005 .

[28]  Hongping Zhu,et al.  Assessing small failure probabilities by AK–SS: An active learning method combining Kriging and Subset Simulation , 2016 .

[29]  Nicolas Gayton,et al.  AK-MCS: An active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo Simulation , 2011 .

[30]  Phaedon-Stelios Koutsourelakis Reliability of structures in high dimensions. Part II. Theoretical validation , 2004 .

[31]  Joe Wiart,et al.  A new surrogate modeling technique combining Kriging and polynomial chaos expansions - Application to uncertainty analysis in computational dosimetry , 2015, J. Comput. Phys..

[32]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions , 1998, J. Glob. Optim..

[33]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Efficient Global Surrogate Modeling for Reliability-Based Design Optimization , 2013 .

[34]  Lyes Nechak,et al.  Sensitivity analysis and Kriging based models for robust stability analysis of brake systems , 2015 .

[35]  Yongshou Liu,et al.  Hybrid reliability analysis with both random and probability-box variables , 2015 .