All Dressed Up With Something to Say: Effects of Typeface Semantic Associations on Brand Perceptions and Consumer Memory

In this research, a conceptual framework is developed that addresses the impact of typeface semantic cues within a marketing context. Visual properties of typefaces are conceptualized as communicating unique semantic associations to individuals distinct from the content of the written words they clothe. Typeface associations are investigated across varying levels of involvement in terms of their effect upon brand perceptions. These associations also influenced the memorability of advertised benefit claims. Memorability was enhanced as the degree of consistency among typeface semantic cues, advertisement visual cues, and advertisement copy claims increased. Extensions of this framework focus on obtaining a more complete understanding concerning the semantic pathways through which typefaces convey meaning.

[1]  A. A. Mitchell,et al.  Psychological processes and advertising effects : theory, research, and applications , 1985 .

[2]  P. Homer,et al.  Physical Attractiveness of the Celebrity Endorser: A Social Adaptation Perspective , 1985 .

[3]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The Effects of Involvement on Responses to Argument Quantity and Quality: Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion , 1984 .

[4]  F. O. Huck,et al.  Visual Information Processing , 1992 .

[5]  R. Lutz.  Affective and cognitive antecedents of attitude toward the ad : A conceptual framework , 1985 .

[6]  Kathy A. Lutz,et al.  Effects of interactive imagery on learning: Application to advertising. , 1977 .

[7]  Stephen J. Boies,et al.  Components of attention. , 1971 .

[8]  M. Brucks.  The Effects of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior , 1985 .

[9]  Bernd H. Schmitt,et al.  Memory for Print Ads , 1993 .

[10]  G. R. Potts,et al.  Mental comparison of size and magnitude: size congruity effects. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  C Lewis,et al.  Typographic influences on reading. , 1989, British journal of psychology.

[12]  S. Chaiken.  Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[13]  Ruari McLean,et al.  The Thames and Hudson Manual of Typography , 1980 .

[14]  M. Posner.  On the Relationship between Letter Names and Superordinate Categories , 1970 .

[15]  Bernd H. Schmitt,et al.  Language and Brand Attitudes: Impact of Script and Sound Matching in Chinese and English , 1996 .

[16]  Kathryn T. Spoehr,et al.  Visual Information Processing , 1982 .

[17]  Amna Kirmani,et al.  The Effect of Perceived Advertising Costs on Brand Perceptions , 1990 .

[18]  H. Rao Unnava,et al.  An Imagery-Processing View of the Role of Pictures in Print Advertisements , 1991 .

[19]  Camille L. Rowe.  The connotative dimensions of selected display typefaces , 1982 .

[20]  Richard E. Mathisen,et al.  Quantifying perceived differences in type styles: An exploratory study , 1995 .

[21]  Sunil Erevelles,et al.  Effects of Presentation Order and Communication Modality on Recall and Attitude , 1994 .

[22]  Miles A. Tinker,et al.  Influence of type form on speed of reading. , 1928 .

[23]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  Picture-Word Consistency and the Elaborative Processing of Advertisements , 1987 .

[24]  D. Bartram,et al.  The perception of semantic quality in type: Differences between designers and non-designers , 1982 .

[25]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  Measurement of Individual Differences in Visual Versus Verbal Information Processing , 1985 .

[26]  Peter Walker,et al.  Predicting the appropriateness of a typeface on the basis of its multi-modal features , 1986 .

[27]  C. Whan Park,et al.  The Differential Role of Characteristics of Music on High- and Low-Involvement Consumers' Processing of Ads , 1991 .

[28]  Kevin Lane Keller.  Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity , 1993 .

[29]  Kenneth R. Lord,et al.  Picture-Based Persuasion Processes and the Moderating Role of Involvement , 1991 .

[30]  A. Paivio.  Perceptual comparisons through the mind’s eye , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[31]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement , 1983 .

[32]  Bernd H. Schmitt,et al.  Language and Consumer Memory: The Impact of Linguistic Differences between Chinese and English , 1994 .

[33]  Bernd H. Schmitt,et al.  Memory for print ads: Understanding relations among brand name, copy, and picture , 1993 .

[34]  M. Tinker,et al.  The influence of type face on the legibility of print. , 1935 .

[35]  Stewart Shapiro,et al.  Comparing implicit and explicit memory for brand names from advertisements. , 1996 .

[36]  M. Tinker.  Legibility of print , 1963 .