Are Foreclosures Contagious?: An Exploratory Space-Time Analysis of Franklin County, Ohio, 2001-2008

Significant foreclosure activity in a weak housing market area is a sign of trouble, suggesting potential subsequent neighborhood decline. This article focuses on an under-researched question of whether higher foreclosure rates in a neighborhood tend to spill over into adjacent neighborhoods. The authors detail exploratory spatial methods to identify where potential spillover effects occur: kernel density surfaces, space-time local indicators of spatial association (LISA) and LISA Markov. Using data for Franklin County, Ohio the authors find that foreclosure rate hotspots are concentrated in lower-income, more African-American central city areas. The majority of hotspots (around 90%) persist over time and space but about 10% of all hotspots are consistent with contagion effects between neighboring areas. Only 1-3% of neighborhoods experience spillovers as below-average to above-average cluster transitions. In general, contagion effects occur in areas with higher rates of African-Americans, poverty and lower median home values and incomes. However, the authors also observe a sub-trend suggesting possibly accelerated hotspot growth in otherwise comparable Caucasian areas.

[1]  Sergio J. Rey,et al.  Spatial Empirics for Economic Growth and Convergence , 2010 .

[2]  Tammy Leonard,et al.  The neighborhood effects of foreclosure , 2009, J. Geogr. Syst..

[3]  L. Anselin.  Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA , 2010 .

[4]  John P. Harding,et al.  The Contagion Effect of Foreclosed Properties , 2008 .

[5]  Rajendra Kulkarni,et al.  The Spatial Aspects of the Foreclosure Crisis: A Look at the New England Region , 2010 .

[6]  Lin Cui.  Foreclosure, Vacancy and Crime , 2010 .

[7]  Dan Immergluck,et al.  The external costs of foreclosure: The impact of single‐family mortgage foreclosures on property values , 2006 .

[8]  Dan Immergluck,et al.  The Impact of Single-family Mortgage Foreclosures on Neighborhood Crime , 2006 .

[9]  Daniel Hartley,et al.  The Effect of Foreclosures on Nearby Housing Prices: Supply or Disamenity? , 2014 .

[10]  Vincent Yao,et al.  The Foreclosure Discount: Myth or Reality? , 2011 .

[11]  Albert J. Sumell.  The Determinants of Foreclosed Property Values: Evidence from Inner-City Cleveland , 2009 .

[12]  Jacob S. Rugh,et al.  Racial Segregation and the American Foreclosure Crisis , 2010, American sociological review.

[13]  Mark Doms,et al.  Subprime mortgage delinquency rates , 2007 .

[14]  Dan Immergluck.  The Local Wreckage of Global Capital: The Subprime Crisis, Federal Policy and High‐Foreclosure Neighborhoods in the US , 2011 .

[15]  William H. Rogers,et al.  Declining foreclosure neighborhood effects over time , 2010 .

[16]  Dan Immergluck,et al.  From the Subprime to the Exotic: Excessive Mortgage Market Risk and Foreclosures , 2008 .

[17]  Wenhua Di,et al.  An analysis of the neighborhood impacts of a mortgage assistance program: A spatial hedonic model , 2010 .

[18]  A. Biswas,et al.  Foreclosures and housing prices in a heterogeneous housing market: Spatial externalities, crowding-in and filtering effects over the short- and long-run , 2010 .

[19]  M. Aalbers,et al.  Geographies of the financial crisis , 2009 .

[20]  Vicki Been,et al.  THE HIGH COST OF SEGREGATION: EXPLORING RACIAL DISPARITIES IN HIGH-COST LENDING , 2009 .

[21]  W. Scott Frame,et al.  Estimating the effect of mortgage foreclosures on nearby property values: a critical review of the literature , 2010 .

[22]  Helen R. Neill,et al.  HUD versus Private Bank Foreclosures: A Spatial and Temporal Analysis , 1995 .

[23]  David Kirk,et al.  Home Foreclosures and Community Crime: Causal or Spurious Association? , 2011 .

[24]  Thomas Sphicopoulos,et al.  Biometric Authentication in Broadband Networks for Location-Based Services , 2009 .

[25]  Lei Ding,et al.  Neighborhood Subprime Lending and the Performance of Community Reinvestment Mortgages , 2010 .

[26]  Nasser Daneshvary,et al.  Estimating the House Foreclosure Discount Corrected for Spatial Price Interdependence and Endogeneity of Marketing Time , 2009 .

[27]  David A. Turcotte,et al.  What Foreclosed Homes Should a Municipality Purchase to Stabilize Vulnerable Neighborhoods? , 2010 .

[28]  Dan Immergluck.  Neighborhoods in the Wake of the Debacle: Intrametropolitan Patterns of Foreclosed Properties , 2009 .

[29]  Sugie Lee,et al.  The Spatial-Temporal Impact of Residential Foreclosures on Single-Family Residential Property Values , 2011 .

[30]  Vicki Been,et al.  Neighborhood Effects of Concentrated Mortgage Foreclosures , 2008 .

[31]  Vincent W. Yao,et al.  Spillover Effects of Foreclosures on Neighborhood Property Values , 2009 .

[32]  K. Newman,et al.  Go Public! , 2010 .

[33]  Chris Brunsdon,et al.  Estimating probability surfaces for geographical point data: an adaptive kernel algorithm , 1995 .

[34]  Anthony Pennington-Cross,et al.  The Value of Foreclosed Property , 2004 .

[35]  Hazel A. Morrow-Jones,et al.  The Impact of Residential Mortgage Foreclosure on Neighborhood Change and Succession , 2010 .

[36]  G. Rebecca Dobbs,et al.  Emerging Methods and Multidisciplinary Applications in Geospatial Research , 2012 .

[37]  Vicki Been,et al.  The Role of Neighborhood Characteristics in Mortgage Default Risk: Evidence from New York City , 2011 .

[38]  Dan Immergluck,et al.  The Foreclosure Crisis, Foreclosed Properties, and Federal Policy: Some Implications for Housing and Community Development Planning , 2009 .

[39]  William H. Rogers,et al.  The Impact of Foreclosures on Neighboring Housing Sales , 2009 .

[40]  Jay Lee,et al.  Impact of Spatial Filtering on the Least Cost Path Method: Selecting a High-Speed Rail Route for Ohio's 3-C Corridor , 2010, Int. J. Appl. Geospat. Res..