LPOD Answer Sets and Nash Equilibria
暂无分享,去创建一个
Logic programs with ordered disjunctions (LPODs) are natural vehicles for expressing choices that have a preference ordering. They are extensions of the familiar extended logic programs that have answer sets as semantics. In game theory, players usually prefer strategies that yield higher payoffs. Since strategies are choices, LPODs would seem to be a suitable logical formalism for expressing some game-theoretic properties. This paper shows how pure strategy normal form games can be encoded as LPODs in such a way that the answer sets that are mutually most preferred by all players are exactly the Nash equilibria. A similar result has been obtained by researchers using a different, but related, logical formalism, viz., ordered choice logic programs that were used to encode extensive games.
[1] Gerhard Brewka,et al. Answer Sets and Qualitative Decision Making , 2005, Synthese.
[2] Alex K. Simpson,et al. Computational Adequacy in an Elementary Topos , 1998, CSL.
[3] H. Raiffa,et al. GAMES AND DECISIONS; INTRODUCTION AND CRITICAL SURVEY. , 1958 .
[4] Marina De Vos,et al. Choice Logic Programs and Nash Equilibria in Strategic Games , 1999, CSL.
[5] Joel Watson,et al. Strategy : An Introduction to Game Theory , 2001 .