The Role of Negative and Positive Feedback in the Second Language Acquisition of the Passé Composé and Imparfait

This study tests the effectiveness of written recasts versus models in the acquisition of the aspectual distinction between two past tenses in French, the passe compose and the imparfait with a pretest, repeated exposure, and posttest design. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions: R (recasting: implicit negative feedback), (modeling: pre-emptive positive evidence), and G (grammar: explicit positive evidence and negative feedback). The M and R groups read a different story with illustrations each week: (a) In the M condition, participants were shown a sentence corresponding to the illustration for 3 seconds, then were asked to answer a related question; (b) in the R condition, participants formed a sentence with given elements based on the illustration, then were exposed to the correct answer for 3 seconds; (c) the G group read traditional grammar lessons, took a short practice, and were presented with the answer key. Posttest results reveal that the R group performed significantly better than the G group but not the M group, partially supporting the hypothesis that recasting is the most effective form of feedback.

[1]  Richard R. Day,et al.  Errors, Interaction, and Correction: A Study of Native-Nonnative Conversations , 1982 .

[2]  P. Gordon.  Learnability and Feedback , 1990 .

[3]  K. Nelson.  Strategies for first language teaching. , 1989 .

[4]  Rick de Graaff,et al.  THE EXPERANTO EXPERIMENT , 1997, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[5]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Resolving a learnability paradox in the acquisition of the verb lexicon. , 1989 .

[6]  H. Chipman,et al.  Aspects of Language Acquisition , 1985 .

[7]  Jan H. Hulstijn,et al.  SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION RESEARCH IN THE LABORATORY , 1997, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[8]  C. Doughty.  Second Language Instruction Does Make a Difference , 1991, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[9]  R. Oliver.  Negative Feedback in Child NS-NNS Conversation , 1995, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[10]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[11]  Wilfried Decoo,et al.  THE INDUCTION-DEDUCTION OPPOSITION: AMBIGUITIES AND COMPLEXITIES OF THE DIDACTIC REALITY , 1996 .

[12]  J. Champollion.  L'essentiel de la grammaire , 1985 .

[13]  P. Robinson.  GENERALIZABILITY AND AUTOMATICITY OF SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING UNDER IMPLICIT, INCIDENTAL, ENHANCED, AND INSTRUCTED CONDITIONS , 1997, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[14]  Merrill Swain,et al.  Manipulating and Complementing Content Teaching To Maximize Second Language Learning , 1988 .

[15]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Feedback for Language Transfer Errors , 1989, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[16]  Birgit Harley,et al.  Age in second language acquisition , 1987 .

[17]  Ann M. Peters,et al.  The Units of Language Acquisition , 1983 .

[18]  N. S. Prabhu,et al.  Second Language Pedagogy , 1987 .

[19]  G. Marcus.  Negative evidence in language acquisition , 1993, Cognition.

[20]  Stephen Krashen,et al.  The Natural Approach , 1983 .

[21]  David Birdsong.  Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition , 1992 .

[22]  T. Pica.  Research on Negotiation: What Does It Reveal about Second-Language Learning Conditions, Processes, and Outcomes?. , 1994 .