Background. The number of shots in the childhood immunization schedule has been increasing and is likely to continue to increase in the coming years. Consideration of the psychologic costs of multiple injections, adverse events and vaccine‐preventable disease is therefore growing in importance. Methods. We assessed parent preferences, using both the time tradeoff (i.e. amount of parent time willing to trade) and willingness‐to‐pay (i.e. dollars willing to pay) metrics, for possible outcomes of vaccination among 206 parents of infants receiving care at Kaiser, Northern California Region. We also explored the relationship between preferences and subject characteristics. Results. In general the amount of time subjects were willing to give up and the quantity of money they were willing to spend to avoid an outcome increased with the severity of the outcome. Preferences for our six main outcomes of interest all differed from one another (P < 0.0001, Tukey's multiple comparisons procedure). Rank correlation coefficients between time tradeoff and willingness‐to‐pay values for the six main outcomes ranged from 0.42 to 0.52 (all P < 0.004). Subject characteristics, including education, income, race/ethnicity and the child's birth order, did not explain the variation in parent preferences. Conclusions. In general subjects were willing to give up more money or time to avoid less desired outcomes. They were willing to give up only very small amounts of their own life expectancy or money to avoid minor, temporary outcomes (e.g. moderate fussiness, fever and pain) whereas they were willing to forego substantial lengths of their life or amounts of money to avoid a major, permanent outcome (i.e. permanent disability). Nonetheless much variation surfaced in the amount of time (or money) subjects were willing to trade to avoid outcomes. If this variation represents true differences in preferences, guideline developers must consider the role of individual parent preferences in decisions concerning vaccination.
[1]
George W. Torrance,et al.
Social preferences for health states: An empirical evaluation of three measurement techniques
,
1976
.
[2]
G. Chapman,et al.
[Medical decision making].
,
1976,
Lakartidningen.
[3]
A. Fasoli.
[Clinical decision analysis].
,
1986,
Annali italiani di medicina interna : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di medicina interna.
[4]
N. Krieger.
Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology.
,
1992,
American journal of public health.
[5]
B. Schwartz,et al.
Acellular pertussis vaccine: recommendations for use as the initial series in infants and children. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious Diseases.
,
1997,
Pediatrics.
[6]
Robert T. Chen,et al.
Addressing the challenges to immunization practice with an economic algorithm for vaccine selection.
,
1998,
Vaccine.
[7]
B. Eastwood,et al.
Comparison of parental and health care professional preferences for the acellular or whole cell pertussis vaccine.
,
1998,
The Pediatric infectious disease journal.
[8]
B. Schwartz,et al.
Poliomyelitis Prevention: Revised Recommendations for Use of Inactivated and Live Oral Poliovirus Vaccines
,
1999,
Pediatrics.
[9]
B. Schwartz,et al.
Recommended Childhood Immunization Schedule—United States, January–December 1999
,
1999,
Pediatrics.