Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy and affective learning

This investigation is the sixth in a series of projects designed to programmatically examine teacher power in the classroom. Recognizing that nonverbal behaviors typically provide the framework for interpreting verbal messages, this project proposed and sequentially tested a heuristic model of student affective learning as a function of behavior alteration techniques and teacher nonverbal immediacy. Employing a two‐study correlational design, the model was tested in five stages across secondary and college students. Results supported the proposed positive relationships among teachers’ use of. behavior alteration techniques, immediacy and student affect for both studies. Teachers’ selective use of verbal control strategies in the classroom was shown to be indirectly related to affective learning as a function of students’ perceptions of teacher immediacy. Interpretations focus on the model, previous power in the classroom studies, and the design of future studies in this program.

[1]  A. Mehrabian,et al.  Categories of Social Behavior , 1972 .

[2]  Jerold L. Hale,et al.  Relational Messages Associated with Nonverbal Behaviors. , 1984 .

[3]  Raymond J. Wlodkowski.  Discipline: The Great False Hope. , 1982 .

[4]  P. Andersen,et al.  The measurement of nonverbal immediacy , 1979 .

[5]  A. Mehrabian.  Inference of attitudes from the posture, orientation, and distance of a communicator. , 1968, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[6]  I. Altman,et al.  Relationship of Nonverbal Behavior to the Social Penetration Process , 1976 .

[7]  W. S. Condon,et al.  SOUND FILM ANALYSIS OF NORMAL AND PATHOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR PATTERNS , 1966, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[8]  J. Blazer,et al.  Children in distress , 1973 .

[9]  A. Mehrabian,et al.  Language Within Language: Immediacy, a Channel in Verbal Communication , 1968 .

[10]  A. Kendon,et al.  The Experimental Analysis of Social Performance1 , 1967 .

[11]  A. Kendon.  Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[12]  B. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain , 1966 .

[13]  Power in the Classroom IV: Teacher Communication Techniques as Alternatives to Discipline. , 1983 .

[14]  Michael D. Scott,et al.  Communication apprehension, student attitudes, and levels of satisfaction , 1977 .

[15]  J. R. French,et al.  The bases of social power. , 1959 .

[16]  P. Watzlawick,et al.  Pragmatics of human communication , 1975 .

[17]  Richard W. Morshead.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Handbook II: Affective Domain , 1965 .

[18]  Jon F. Nussbaum,et al.  Three investigations exploring relationships between perceived teacher communication behaviors and student learning , 1981 .

[19]  W. Hoy.  The Influence of Experience on the Beginning Teacher , 1968, The School Review.

[20]  R. Heslin,et al.  Perceptions of cross-sex and same-sex nonreciprocal touch: It is better to give than to receive , 1982 .

[21]  J. Burgoon.  Nonverbal Communication Research in the 1970s: An Overview , 1980 .

[22]  P. Kearney,et al.  Teacher immediacy for affective learning in divergent college classes , 1985 .

[23]  Virginia P. Richmond,et al.  Power in the Classroom I: Teacher and Student Perceptions. , 1983 .

[24]  Patricia Kearney,et al.  Relationships Among Teacher Communication Style, Trait and State Communication Apprehension and Teacher Effectiveness , 1980 .

[25]  M. Arlin.  Teacher Transitions Can Disrupt Time Flow in Classrooms , 1979 .

[26]  A. Mehrabian.  Significance of posture and posiion in the communication of attitude and status relationships. , 1969, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  K. Heal.  Misbehaviour Among School Children: The Role of the School in Strategies for Prevention , 1978 .

[28]  Power in the Classroom V: Behavior Alteration Techniques, Communication Training, and Learning. , 1985 .

[29]  J. F. Andersen.  Teacher Immediacy as a Predictor of Teaching Effectiveness , 1979 .

[30]  Virginia P. Richmond,et al.  Power in the classroom II: Power and learning , 1984 .

[31]  M. Krantz,et al.  Task Persistence and Adult Assistance in the Preschool. , 1979 .

[32]  Albert Mehbabian.  Orientation behaviors and nonverbal attitude communication. , 1967 .

[33]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  Power in the Classroom III: Teacher Communication Techniques and Messages. , 1985 .

[34]  M. Patterson.  Compensation in Nonverbal Immediacy Behaviors: A Review , 1973 .

[35]  F. Ascione,et al.  Changing On-Task, Off-Task, and Disruptive Pupil Behavior in Elementary Mainstreaming Classrooms , 1979 .

[36]  J. Burgoon.  The Unspoken dialogue : an introduction to nonverbal communication / Judee K. Burgoon, Thomas Saine , 1978 .