Examining effects of acoustic feedback on perception and modification of movement patterns in on-water rowing training

This paper describes a concept for providing acoustic feedback during on-water training to elite rowers and its implementation into the training process. The final aim was to improve the mean boat velocity by a reduction of intra-cyclic interruptions in the boat acceleration. It was assumed to enhance athletes' perception for the modification of movement patterns and control in technique training because sound conveys time-critical structures subliminally. That is of crucial importance for the precision of modifying movements to improve their execution. Advances in technology allow the design for innovative feedback systems to communicate feedback information audibly to athletes. The acoustic feedback system Sofirow was designed and field-tested with elite athletes. The device presents the boat acceleration-time trace audibly and online to athletes and coaches. The results showed a significant increase in the mean boat velocity during the sections with acoustic feedback compared to the sections without. It is thus very supportive to implement acoustic feedback regularly into training processes for elite athletes. A behavioral dynamics approach was invoked to provide a theoretical basis for this concept.

[1]  Jeffrey E. Boyd,et al.  CORRECTIVE SONIC FEEDBACK FOR SPEED SKATING: A CASE STUDY , 2010 .

[2]  Reinhard Kopiez,et al.  Wirkungsphänomene des Rhythmus , 2008 .

[3]  Michael H. Thaut,et al.  Rhythm, Music, and the Brain: Scientific Foundations and Clinical Applications , 2005 .

[4]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. , 1988 .

[5]  Robert Höldrich,et al.  PhysioSonic - Evaluated Movement Sonification as Auditory Feedback in Physiotherapy , 2009, CMMR/ICAD.

[6]  P. Terry,et al.  THE PSYCHOPHYSICAL EFFECTS OF MUSIC IN SPORT AND EXERCISE: A REVIEW , 1997 .

[7]  K Affeld,et al.  Assessment of rowing efficiency. , 1993, International journal of sports medicine.

[8]  Alfred O. Effenberg MULTIMODAL CONVERGENT INFORMATION ENHANCES PERCEPTION ACCURACY OF HUMAN MOVEMENT PATTERNS , 2001 .

[9]  Alfred Effenberg,et al.  Movement sonification: Effects on perception and action , 2005, IEEE MultiMedia.

[10]  E. Saltzman,et al.  Action Representation of Sound: Audiomotor Recognition Network While Listening to Newly Acquired Actions , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Helge J. Ritter,et al.  AcouMotion - An Interactive Sonification System for Acoustic Motion Control , 2005, Gesture Workshop.

[12]  Thomas Hermann,et al.  TAXONOMY AND DEFINITIONS FOR SONIFICATION AND AUDITORY DISPLAY , 2008 .

[13]  W. H. Warren The dynamics of perception and action. , 2006, Psychological review.

[14]  Terri L. Bonebright,et al.  Sonific ation Report: Status of the Field and Research Agenda , 2010 .

[15]  P. Cook,et al.  Memory for musical tempo: Additional evidence that auditory memory is absolute , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  John G. Neuhoff,et al.  Sonification Report: Status of the Field and Research Agenda Prepared for the National Science Foundation by members of the International Community for Auditory Display , 1999 .

[17]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[18]  Lorenzo Chiari,et al.  Audio-biofeedback for balance improvement: an accelerometry-based system , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.