Hybrid ZTE/Dixon MR‐based attenuation correction for quantitative uptake estimation of pelvic lesions in PET/MRI

Purpose: This study introduces a new hybrid ZTE/Dixon MR‐based attenuation correction (MRAC) method including bone density estimation for PET/MRI and quantifies the effects of bone attenuation on metastatic lesion uptake in the pelvis. Methods: Six patients with pelvic lesions were scanned using fluorodeoxyglucose (18F‐FDG) in an integrated time‐of‐flight (TOF) PET/MRI system. For PET attenuation correction, MR imaging consisted of two‐point Dixon and zero echo‐time (ZTE) pulse sequences. A continuous‐value fat and water pseudoCT was generated from a two‐point Dixon MRI. Bone was segmented from the ZTE images and converted to Hounsfield units (HU) using a continuous two‐segment piecewise linear model based on ZTE MRI intensity. The HU values were converted to linear attenuation coefficients (LAC) using a bilinear model. The bone voxels of the Dixon‐based pseudoCT were replaced by the ZTE‐derived bone to produce the hybrid ZTE/Dixon pseudoCT. The three different AC maps (Dixon, hybrid ZTE/Dixon, CTAC) were used to reconstruct PET images using a TOF‐ordered subset expectation maximization algorithm with a point‐spread function model. Metastatic lesions were separated into two classes, bone lesions and soft tissue lesions, and analyzed. The MRAC methods were compared using a root‐mean‐squared error (RMSE), where the registered CTAC was taken as ground truth. Results: The RMSE of the maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) is 11.02% and 7.79% for bone (N = 6) and soft tissue lesions (N = 8), respectively, using Dixon MRAC. The RMSE of SUVmax for these lesions is significantly reduced to 3.28% and 3.94% when using the new hybrid ZTE/Dixon MRAC. Additionally, the RMSE for PET SUVs across the entire pelvis and all patients are 8.76% and 4.18%, for the Dixon and hybrid ZTE/Dixon MRAC methods, respectively. Conclusion: A hybrid ZTE/Dixon MRAC method was developed and applied to pelvic regions in an integrated TOF PET/MRI, demonstrating improved MRAC. This new method included bone density estimation, through which PET quantification is improved.

[1]  Gaspar Delso,et al.  Design Features and Mutual Compatibility Studies of the Time-of-Flight PET Capable GE SIGNA PET/MR System , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  A. Buck,et al.  Evaluation of Atlas-Based Attenuation Correction for Integrated PET/MR in Human Brain: Application of a Head Atlas and Comparison to True CT-Based Attenuation Correction , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  Jeffrey A Fessler,et al.  A female pelvic bone shape model for air/bone separation in support of synthetic CT generation for radiation therapy , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  G. Delso,et al.  Zero TE MR bone imaging in the head , 2016, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  J L Ackerman,et al.  Continuous MR bone density measurement using water- and fat-suppressed projection imaging (WASPI) for PET attenuation correction in PET-MR , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  G. Hermosillo,et al.  Whole-Body PET/MR Imaging: Quantitative Evaluation of a Novel Model-Based MR Attenuation Correction Method Including Bone , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Reply: Simplified Methods for Quantification of 18F-Fluoromethylcholine Uptake: Is SUVAUC,PP Actually an SUV? , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  M. Weiger,et al.  Future image acquisition trends for PET/MRI. , 2015, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[9]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Impact of Time-of-Flight PET on Quantification Errors in MR Imaging–Based Attenuation Correction , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  Stefan Förster,et al.  MR-Based Attenuation Correction Using Ultrashort-Echo-Time Pulse Sequences in Dementia Patients , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  Karthik S. Gurumoorthy,et al.  Automatic Determination of Anatomical Correspondences for Multimodal Field of View Correction , 2014, GCPR.

[12]  J. Gee,et al.  The Insight ToolKit image registration framework , 2014, Front. Neuroinform..

[13]  N. Alpert,et al.  Bias Atlases for Segmentation-Based PET Attenuation Correction Using PET-CT and MR , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[14]  H. Quick,et al.  Magnetic Resonance–Based Attenuation Correction for PET/MR Hybrid Imaging Using Continuous Valued Attenuation Maps , 2013, Investigative radiology.

[15]  G. Delso,et al.  PET–MR imaging using a tri-modality PET/CT–MR system with a dedicated shuttle in clinical routine , 2013, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[16]  G. Delso,et al.  Evaluation of an Atlas-Based PET Head Attenuation Correction Using PET/CT & MR Patient Data , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[17]  S. Thiruvenkadam,et al.  Comparison of 4-class and continuous fat/water methods for whole-body, MR-based PET attenuation correction , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[18]  C. Kuhl,et al.  MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for Hybrid PET/MRI Systems: A 4-Class Tissue Segmentation Technique Using a Combined Ultrashort-Echo-Time/Dixon MRI Sequence , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  I. Burger,et al.  PET/MR imaging of bone lesions – implications for PET quantification from imperfect attenuation correction , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[20]  Ilja Bezrukov,et al.  MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for Whole-Body PET/MRI: Quantitative Evaluation of Segmentation- and Atlas-Based Methods , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Ultrashort echo time MRI of cortical bone at 7 tesla field strength: A feasibility study , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[22]  Guy B. Williams,et al.  Attenuation Correction Methods Suitable for Brain Imaging with a PET/MRI Scanner: A Comparison of Tissue Atlas and Template Attenuation Map Approaches , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  Mark Bydder,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging of cortical bone. , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[24]  Jeffry S Nyman,et al.  Characterization of 1H NMR signal in human cortical bone for magnetic resonance imaging , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  Ciprian Catana,et al.  Toward Implementing an MRI-Based PET Attenuation-Correction Method for Neurologic Studies on the MR-PET Brain Prototype , 2010, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[26]  S. Vandenberghe,et al.  MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for PET/MRI Using Ultrashort Echo Time Sequences , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  Eduard Schreibmann,et al.  MR-based attenuation correction for hybrid PET-MR brain imaging systems using deformable image registration. , 2010, Medical physics.

[28]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  N4ITK: Improved N3 Bias Correction , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[29]  Steven G. Ross,et al.  Application and Evaluation of a Measured Spatially Variant System Model for PET Image Reconstruction , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[30]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Tissue Classification as a Potential Approach for Attenuation Correction in Whole-Body PET/MRI: Evaluation with PET/CT Data , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[31]  Graeme P. Penney,et al.  Use of a CT statistical deformation model for multi-modal pelvic bone segmentation , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[32]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Atlas-guided non-uniform attenuation correction in cerebral 3D PET imaging , 2005, NeuroImage.

[33]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner. , 1998, Medical physics.

[34]  Moshe Ben-Bassat,et al.  TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE , 2022 .