Dynamic comparison of different types of slab track and ballasted track using a flexible track model

The dynamic performance of a ballasted track and three types of slab track is analysed and compared by means of a comprehensive dynamic model of the train–track system, generated using two commercial analysis software packages: the commercial multibody system (MBS) analysis software SIMPACK and the finite element method (FEM) analysis software NASTRAN. The use of a commercial MBS software makes it possible to include, in a reliable way, models of advanced non-linear wheel–rail contact as well as complex elements or joints in the vehicle model, while the FEM the flexibility of the rail and the slab to be taken into account. As a result, a combined MBS–FEM representation of the vehicle–track model is integrated into the MBS software, which allows for the study of dynamic phenomena in a wide frequency range. In this study, other simpler approaches for modelling the dynamic vehicle–track interaction are also considered, such as pure multibody or FE representations of the whole vehicle–track system. The quality of the results obtained with the different types of models used is analysed, and some conclusions are put forth regarding the possible validity of rather simple train–track interaction model types under certain conditions as well as the most suitable configuration of the most complex models.

[1]  Xuesong Jin,et al.  Effect of sleeper pitch on rail corrugation at a tangent track in vehicle hunting , 2008 .

[2]  Gang Xie,et al.  Simulation of wear on a rough rail using a time-domain wheel–track interaction model , 2008 .

[3]  Y Bezin,et al.  An investigation of sleeper voids using a flexible track model integrated with railway multi-body dynamics , 2009 .

[4]  Jens C. O. Nielsen,et al.  Railway vehicle/track interaction analysis using a modal substructuring approach , 2006 .

[5]  R. Guyan.  Reduction of stiffness and mass matrices , 1965 .

[6]  Simon Iwnicki,et al.  The dynamic response of slab track constructions and their benefit with respect to conventional ballasted track , 2010 .

[7]  Karl Popp,et al.  System dynamics and long-term behaviour of railway vehicles, track and subgrade: report on the DFG Priority Programme in Germany and subsequent research , 2005 .

[8]  Wanming Zhai,et al.  Fundamentals of vehicle–track coupled dynamics , 2009 .

[9]  F J Gonzalez,et al.  Safety assessment of underground vehicles passing over highly resilient straight track in the presence of a broken rail , 2008 .

[10]  Klaus Knothe,et al.  Modelling of Railway Track and Vehicle/Track Interaction at High Frequencies , 1993 .

[11]  T. X. Wu,et al.  On the parametric excitation of the wheel/track system , 2004 .

[12]  Hem Hunt,et al.  Modelling of floating-slab tracks with continuous slabs under oscillating moving loads , 2006 .

[13]  Jens C. O. Nielsen,et al.  Train-Track Interaction and Mechanisms of Irregular Wear on Wheel and Rail Surfaces , 2003 .

[14]  Cheng Hao Huang,et al.  Vibration characteristics of floating slab track , 2008 .

[15]  S. Dietz,et al.  Interaction of Vehicles and Flexible Tracks by Co-Simulation of Multibody Vehicle Systems and Finite Element Track Models , 2002 .

[16]  J. Santamaria,et al.  Dynamic optimization of track components to minimize rail corrugation , 2009 .

[17]  Geert Lombaert,et al.  The control of ground-borne vibrations from railway traffic by means of continuous floating slabs , 2006 .

[18]  Yann Bezin,et al.  The study of the dynamic response of a slab track construction and its benefits with respect to conventional ballasted track , 2009 .

[19]  Karl Popp,et al.  Vehicle-Track Dynamics in the Mid-Frequency Range , 1999 .