Spatial frequency tuning of the Ouchi illusion and its dependence on stimulus size

This study investigated the effects of the stimulus size on the spatial frequency tuning of the Ouchi illusion, which is an illusory sliding motion perceived in a checkerboard pattern of rectangular elements that is surrounded by a checkerboard pattern of orthogonally oriented elements. Two experiments were conducted to measure the perceived strength of illusion. The optimal size of the inner pattern increased proportionally with check size. In contrast, the optimal check size increased with the size of the inner pattern but not proportionally, and the range of increase was relatively small. The optimal fundamental spatial frequency was lower for a larger stimulus both for checkerboard patterns and simpler sinusoidal grating patterns, but there were differences in the tuning curves for the two types of stimuli. These results support the idea that two processes underlie the Ouchi illusion; one computes the local motion direction, and the other integrates motion signals across space for surface segmentation. For the checkerboard and grating stimuli, the former process may be different while the latter can be shared.

[1]  B. Khang,et al.  Apparent Relative Motion from a Checkerboard Surround , 1997, Perception.

[2]  Robert Pless,et al.  The Ouchi illusion as an artifact of biased flow estimation , 2000, Vision Research.

[3]  Hajime Ouchi Japanese Optical and Geometrical Art , 1977 .

[4]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. I. General characteristics and postnatal development. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Trevor J. Hine,et al.  An illusion of relative motion dependent upon spatial frequency and orientation , 1995, Vision Research.

[6]  L. Spillmann Apparent displacement and phase unlocking in checkerboard patterns , 1986 .

[7]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Stabilizing the visual world: A jitter aftereffect reveals motion-based correction , 1998 .

[8]  G. Mather Integration Biases in the Ouchi and other Visual Illusions , 2000, Perception.

[9]  H R Wilson,et al.  The role of second-order motion signals in coherence and transparency. , 1994, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[10]  J. van Santen,et al.  Elaborated Reichardt detectors. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[11]  B. Khang,et al.  A Motion Illusion from Two-Dimensional Periodic Patterns , 1997, Perception.

[12]  David R. Badcock,et al.  Two-stage analysis of the motion of 2-dimensional patterns, what is the first stage? , 1992, Vision Research.

[13]  P. Thompson Perceived rate of movement depends on contrast , 1982, Vision Research.

[14]  H. Wilson,et al.  A psychophysically motivated model for two-dimensional motion perception , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[15]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[16]  Gregory Bock,et al.  Higher-order processing in the visual system , 1994 .

[17]  A. Derrington,et al.  Second-order motion discrimination by feature-tracking , 1999, Vision Research.

[18]  T. Hine,et al.  The Ouchi illusion: An anomaly in the perception of rigid motion for limited spatial frequencies and angles , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  Periodic-pattern-selective cells in monkey visual cortex , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[20]  H. Wilson,et al.  Moving two-dimensional patterns can capture the perceived directions of lower or higher spatial frequency gratings , 1992, Vision Research.

[21]  Vincent P. Ferrera,et al.  Direction specific masking and the analysis of motion in two dimensions , 1987, Vision Research.

[22]  H. Wilson,et al.  Perceived direction of moving two-dimensional patterns , 1990, Vision Research.

[23]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  A jitter after-effect reveals motion-based stabilization of vision , 1998, Nature.