Life Cycle Assessment of pork production: A data inventory for the case of Germany

Abstract The world's growing population is continually increasing the demand for food. Hence, food production, especially the production of meat, is put under further pressure to tackle climate change. Two-thirds of the German meat production is covered by pork, which increases the necessity to assess the environmental impacts arising from it. Therefore, the aim of this study was to provide data for an environmental profile of latest pork production in Germany. A Life Cycle Assessment was conducted for pork production in 2010/2011. The system boundaries encompassed the production of feedstuffs, the housing of pigs, and the slaughtering and production of pork. In this context, the pig housing stage was modelled using separate data for different housing stages (i.e. farrowing, weaning and finishing). Results for the impact categories global warming potential , eutrophication and acidification are expressed per kg pork as slaughter weight. The global warming potential was estimated at 3.22 kg CO 2 -eq per kg pork. Eutrophication showed a value of 23.3 g PO 4 -eq, whereas acidification resulted in 57.1 g SO 2 -eq per kg pork. To estimate the influence of various input parameters, a sensitivity analysis was carried out for four different input parameters. They were related to water and energy use (energy use in feed production, energy use in fattening stage, type of energy used in pig housing and slaughtering, and water use) since literature values differ significantly. All of them were calculated with three different characterisation methods, namely CML 2 Baseline 2000, EDIP 2003 and IMPACT 2002+. The only input parameter tested which affected the results is energy use in the fattening stage.

[1]  I Traulsen,et al.  Environmental Impact Assessment--methodology with special emphasis on European pork production. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[2]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology , 2003 .

[3]  Helmut Döhler,et al.  Faustzahlen für die Landwirtschaft , 2009 .

[4]  J. Dourmad,et al.  Development of a calculation model for predicting the amount of N excreted by the pig: effect of feeding, physiological stage and performance , 1992 .

[5]  H. Steinfeld,et al.  Livestock's long shadow: environmental issues and options. , 2006 .

[6]  Anna Björklund,et al.  Survey of approaches to improve reliability in lca , 2002 .

[7]  N. Halberg,et al.  LCA of soybean meal , 2008 .

[8]  H.M.G. van der Werf,et al.  Methods and data for the environmental inventory of contrasting pig production systems , 2007 .

[9]  J. Porter,et al.  A model for fossil energy use in Danish agriculture used to compare organic and conventional farming , 2001 .

[10]  C. Pomar,et al.  Modelling of manure production by pigs and NH3, N2O and CH4 emissions. Part I: animal excretion and enteric CH4, effect of feeding and performance. , 2010, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[11]  Jean Petit,et al.  Perception of the environmental impacts of current and alternative modes of pig production by stakeholder groups. , 2003, Journal of environmental management.

[12]  H. Steinfeld,et al.  Livestock's Long Shadow , 2006 .

[13]  Mary Ann Curran,et al.  The international workshop on electricity data for life cycle inventories , 2005 .

[14]  N. Halberg,et al.  Modelling representative and coherent Danish farm types based on farm accountancy data for use in environmental assessments , 2006 .

[15]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  Data quality management for life cycle inventories—an example of using data quality indicators☆ , 1996 .

[16]  M. J. Ramos-Peralonso,et al.  Integrated pollution prevention and control , 2001 .

[17]  M Guo,et al.  LCA data quality: sensitivity and uncertainty analysis. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[18]  C. Cederberg,et al.  The interaction between milk and beef production and emissions from land use change – critical considerations in life cycle assessment and carbon footprint studies of milk , 2012 .

[19]  Ligia Tiruta-Barna,et al.  Environmental impact and risk assessment of mineral wastes reuse strategies : Review and critical analysis of approaches and applications , 2007 .

[20]  Jeroen B. Guinee,et al.  Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards , 2002 .

[21]  H. V. D. Werf,et al.  Environmental evaluation of transfer and treatment of excess pig slurry by life cycle assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[22]  S. O. Petersen,et al.  Algorithms for calculating methane and nitrous oxide emissions from manure management , 2004, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[23]  I. D. Boer,et al.  Environmental assessment tools for the evaluation and improvement of European livestock production systems , 2005 .

[24]  D. S. Chianese,et al.  The carbon footprint of dairy production systems through partial life cycle assessment. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[25]  S G Sommer,et al.  INTERACTIONS BETWEEN PHOSPHORUS FEEDING STRATEGIES FOR PIGS AND DAIRY COWS AND SEPARATION EFFICIENCY OF SLURRY , 2008, Environmental technology.

[26]  C. Basset-Mens,et al.  Scenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: the case of pig production in France , 2005 .

[27]  Jean Petit,et al.  Evaluation of the environmental impact of agriculture at the farm level: a comparison and analysis of 12 indicator-based methods , 2002 .