Techno-economic assessment of fast pyrolysis for the valorization of short rotation coppice cultivated for phytoextraction

Abstract The main barrier in the commercialization of phytoextraction as a sustainable alternative for remediating metal contaminated soils is its long time period, which can be countered by biomass valorization. From an environmental point of view, fast pyrolysis of the biomass is promising because its lower process temperature prevents metal volatilization. The remaining question is whether fast pyrolysis is also preferred from an economic point of view. Therefore, a techno-economic assessment of fast pyrolysis has been performed for a case study in the Campine region in Belgium. For this region, willow trees cultivated in short rotation have the right characteristics to serve as a phytoextracting crop. A techno-economic assessment requires by definition a multidisciplinary approach. The problem statement urges for a focus on the economic profitability from the viewpoint of an investor, including economic risk analysis. Fast pyrolysis seems more profitable than gasification. The profit is dependent on the scale of operation, the policy support (subsidies) and the oil yield. The economic risk can be reduced by increasing the scale of operation by means of complementing feedstocks, and by valorization of the char byproduct by subsequent processing to activated carbon.

[1]  A. Bridgwater.  Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading , 2012 .

[2]  Gordon McKay,et al.  Production of activated carbons from waste tire--process design and economical analysis. , 2004, Waste management.

[3]  Göran Berndes,et al.  Cadmium accumulation and Salix-based phytoextraction on arable land in Sweden , 2004 .

[4]  V. Putsche,et al.  Large-Scale Pyrolysis Oil Production: A Technology Assessment and Economic Analysis , 2006 .

[5]  A Dufour,et al.  Activated carbons prepared from wood particleboard wastes: characterisation and phenol adsorption capacities. , 2009, Journal of hazardous materials.

[6]  Gerrit K. Janssens,et al.  Flash co-pyrolysis of biomass: The influence of biopolymers , 2009 .

[7]  L. Meulbroek.  A SENIOR MANAGER'S GUIDE TO INTEGRATED RISK MANAGEMENT , 2002 .

[8]  Gordon McKay,et al.  Production of activated carbon from bamboo scaffolding waste—process design, evaluation and sensitivity analysis , 2005 .

[9]  Peter McKendry,et al.  Energy production from biomass (Part 1): Overview of biomass. , 2002, Bioresource technology.

[10]  R. Shih,et al.  Benefit assessment of cost, energy, and environment for biomass pyrolysis oil , 2013 .

[11]  H. Bart,et al.  Removal of phosphorus and sulfur from yellow phosphorus off-gas by metal-modified activated carbon , 2011 .

[12]  Yacov Y. Haimes,et al.  Risk modeling, assessment, and management , 1998 .

[13]  Palanivel Sathishkumar,et al.  Utilization of agro-industrial waste Jatropha curcas pods as an activated carbon for the adsorption of reactive dye Remazol Brilliant Blue R (RBBR) , 2012 .

[14]  A. Faaij,et al.  The economic value of the phytoremediation function – Assessed by the example of cadmium remediation by willow (Salix ssp) , 2006 .

[15]  Peng Sui,et al.  Use of life cycle assessment methodology for determining phytoremediation potentials of maize-based cropping systems in fields with nitrogen fertilizer over-dose. , 2010 .

[16]  Tom Kuppens,et al.  Economics of electricity and heat production by gasification or flash pyrolysis of short rotation coppice in Flanders (Belgium) , 2011 .

[17]  W.P.M. van Swaaij,et al.  Techno-economic evaluation of high temperature pyrolysis processes for mixed plastic waste. , 1998 .

[18]  J. Vangronsveld,et al.  Flash pyrolysis of heavy metal contaminated biomass from phytoremediation: Influence of temperature, entrained flow and wood/leaves blended pyrolysis on the behaviour of heavy metals , 2010 .

[19]  A. Boardman,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice , 1996 .

[20]  R. Siemons,et al.  A development perspective for biomassfuelled electricity generation technologies. Economic technology assesment in view of sustainability , 2002 .

[21]  T. Kuppens,et al.  Activated carbon from co-pyrolysis of particle board and melamine (urea) formaldehyde resin: A techno-economic evaluation , 2011 .

[22]  Zulfan Adi Putra,et al.  Techno‐economic assessment of biomass pre‐conversion processes as a part of biomass‐to‐liquids line‐up , 2009 .

[23]  Donatien Njomo,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of a plastic cover solar air heater , 1995 .

[24]  S. Ulgiati,et al.  Life cycle assessment of Brassica carinata biomass conversion to bioenergy and platform chemicals , 2014 .

[25]  M. Trari,et al.  Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from wild olive cores (oleaster) by H3PO4 for the removal of Basic Red 46 , 2013 .

[26]  David Granatstein,et al.  Economic tradeoff between biochar and bio-oil production via pyrolysis , 2011 .

[27]  Colin B. Sorenson,et al.  A COMPARATIVE FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF FAST PYROLYSIS PLANTS IN , 2010 .

[28]  A. J. Toft,et al.  A techno-economic comparison of power production by biomass fast pyrolysis with gasification and combustion , 2002 .

[29]  T. Cornelissen,et al.  Fast pyrolysis of heavy metal contaminated willow: Influence of the plant part , 2009 .

[30]  Reinhart Ceulemans,et al.  Financial analysis of the cultivation of poplar and willow for bioenergy , 2012 .

[31]  John G. Rogers.  A techno-economic assessment of the use of fast pyrolysis bio-oil from UK energy crops in the production of electricity and combined heat and power , 2009 .

[32]  Mathieu Tahon.  Flexibility, competitive and cooperative interactions in telecommunication networks: a model for extended techno-economic evaluation , 2013 .

[33]  Farid Nasir Ani,et al.  Techno-economics of rice husk pyrolysis, conversion with catalytic treatment to produce liquid fuel , 2000 .

[34]  N. Dickinson,et al.  Cadmium phytoextraction using short-rotation coppice Salix: the evidence trail. , 2005, Environment international.

[35]  Ruud Smits,et al.  Technology assessment and technology policy in Europe: New concepts, new goals, new infrastructures , 1995 .

[36]  Jan Baeyens,et al.  Modeling CFB biomass pyrolysis reactors , 2008 .

[37]  Tom Kuppens,et al.  Economics of Flash Pyrolysis of Short Rotation Willow from Phytoextraction , 2010 .

[38]  T. Kuppens,et al.  Economic assessment of flash co-pyrolysis of short rotation coppice and biopolymer waste streams. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[39]  André Faaij,et al.  Pre-treatment technologies, and their effect on international bioenergy supply chain logistics. Techno-economic evaluation of torrefaction, fast pyrolysis and pelletisation , 2008 .

[40]  A. Bridgwater.  The technical and economic feasibility of biomass gasification for power generation , 1995 .

[41]  J. G. Isebrands,et al.  Linking phytoremediated pollutant removal to biomass economic opportunities. , 2005 .

[42]  Akwasi A. Boateng,et al.  Activated carbon from broiler litter: Process description and cost of production , 2008 .

[43]  Otto Rentz,et al.  The reference installation approach for the techno-economic assessment of emission abatement options and the determination of bat according to the IPPC-directive , 2000 .

[44]  M. Achternbosch,et al.  Material flows and investment costs of flue gas cleaning systems of municipal solid waste incinerators , 2002 .

[45]  Bin Song,et al.  LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF FLASH PYROLYSIS OF WOOD WASTE , 2010 .

[46]  S. Souza,et al.  Study of lead (II) adsorption onto activated carbon originating from cow bone , 2014 .

[47]  W. Mostert,et al.  A development perspective for biomass-fuelled electricity generation technologies. Economic technology assessment in view of sustainability , 2004 .

[48]  Sofie Verbrugge,et al.  Practical steps in techno-economic evaluation of network deployment planning part 1: Methodology overview , 2008, Networks 2008 - The 13th International Telecommunications Network Strategy and Planning Symposium.

[49]  D. Lelie,et al.  Phytoremediation of contaminated soils and groundwater: lessons from the field , 2009, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[50]  S. Van Passel,et al.  Phytoremediation, a sustainable remediation technology? II: Economic assessment of CO2 abatement through the use of phytoremediation crops for renewable energy production. , 2012 .

[51]  John Brammer,et al.  Estimation of the production cost of fast pyrolysis bio-oil , 2012 .

[52]  Krzysztof Urbaniec,et al.  Hydrogen production from sugar beet molasses – a techno-economic study , 2014 .

[53]  Yu Qian,et al.  Environmental impact and techno-economic analysis of the coal gasification process with/without CO2 capture , 2014 .

[54]  Jian Ma,et al.  Techno-economic analysis and engineering design consideration of algal biofuel in southern Nevada , 2011 .

[55]  Anastasia Zabaniotou,et al.  Techno-economic assessment of recycling practices of municipal solid wastes in Cyprus , 2008 .

[56]  Andrew T. Harris,et al.  Indicative assessment of the feasibility of Ni and Au phytomining in Australia , 2009 .

[57]  A. Faaij,et al.  Efficiency and economy of wood-fired biomass energy systems in relation to scale regarding heat and power generation using combustion and gasification technologies , 2001 .

[58]  P. M. Pelagagge,et al.  Economics of biomass energy utilization in combustion and gasification plants: effects of logistic variables , 2005 .

[59]  Terje Aven,et al.  Expressing Economic Risk—Review and Presentation of a Unifying Approach , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[60]  Nathalie Márquez,et al.  Development and techno‐economic evaluation of a biorefinery based on biomass (waste) streams – case study in the Netherlands , 2014 .

[61]  A. Bridgwater,et al.  An overview of fast pyrolysis of biomass , 1999 .