The Role of Perceptual Load in Processing Distractor Faces

It has been established that successful ignoring of irrelevant distractors depends on the extent to which the current task loads attention. However, the previous load studies have typically employed neutral distractor stimuli (e.g., letters). In the experiments reported here, we examined whether the perception of irrelevant distractor faces would show the same effects. We manipulated attentional load in a relevant task of name search by varying the search set size and found that whereas congruency effects from meaningful nonface distractors were eliminated by higher search load, interference from distractor faces was entirely unaffected by search load. These results support the idea that face processing may be mandatory and generalize the load theory to the processing of meaningful and more complex nonface distractors.

[1]  Jon Driver,et al.  Ignoring famous faces: Category-specific dilution of distractor interference , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  The influence of divided attention on holistic face perception , 2002, Cognition.

[3]  N. Lavie,et al.  Changing Faces: A Detection Advantage in the Flicker Paradigm , 2001, Psychological science.

[4]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  Selective attention and cognitive control: dissociating attentional functions through different types of load , 1998 .

[6]  N Lavie,et al.  The role of perceptual load in negative priming. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  J. Findlay,et al.  Face Detection in Peripheral Vision: Do Faces Pop Out? , 1997, Perception.

[8]  C D Frith,et al.  Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task. , 1997, Science.

[9]  N. Lavie,et al.  On the Efficiency of Visual Selective Attention: Efficient Visual Search Leads to Inefficient Distractor Rejection , 1997 .

[10]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  M. Tarr,et al.  Becoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition , 1997, Vision Research.

[12]  M. Farah Is face recognition ‘special’? Evidence from neuropsychology , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.

[13]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  FACIAL ORGANIZATION BLOCKS ACCESS TO LOW-LEVEL FEATURES: AN OBJECT INFERIORITY EFFECT , 1995 .

[14]  N. Lavie Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Multiple parallel access in visual attention. , 1994, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[16]  Y. Tsal,et al.  Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  P Jolicoeur,et al.  Impact of Quality of the Image, Orientation, and Similarity of the Stimuli on Visual Search for Faces , 1994, Perception.

[18]  H. Nothdurft Faces and Facial Expressions do not Pop Out , 1993, Perception.

[19]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  G. Baylis,et al.  Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  D I Perrett,et al.  Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[22]  S. Yantis,et al.  Mechanisms of attentional selection: Temporally modulated priority tags , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  A. Young,et al.  Face-name interference. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  W. H. Warren,et al.  Visual control of step length during running over irregular terrain. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[26]  J. Fodor,et al.  The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology , 1984 .

[27]  G. V. Van Hoesen,et al.  Prosopagnosia , 1982, Neurology.

[28]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  Patient-based approaches to cognitive neuroscience , 2000 .