Haemodynamic effects of increasing angle of head up tilt

OBJECTIVE To investigate the haemodynamic effects of varying the angle of head up tilt. METHODS 20 healthy subjects (12 female, eight male; mean (SD) age 33.6 (8.4) years) underwent head up tilt for five minutes to each of four angles of tilt in random order, with a five minute rest period at the horizontal between each angle. Forearm blood flow was measured using intermittent occlusion mercury strain gauge plethysmography at two and five minutes. Subjects underwent continuous monitoring of heart rate, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by Finapres and cardiac output and stroke volume by impedance cardiography. Each variable was measured at two and five minutes, averaged over the period of blood flow measurement. RESULTS Every haemodynamic variable at each angle was significantly different from supine values. Head up tilt produced progressive increases in heart rate (11-21%), SBP (12-21%), and DBP (20-33%) with increasing tilt angle. However, although 45 degrees produced significantly less haemodynamic effect, there were no significant differences for angles between 60 degrees and 90 degrees. Cardiac output fell on head up tilt by 17-20% and stroke volume by 28-34%, but increasing tilt angle produced no significant additional reduction in cardiac output and stroke volume because of increases in heart rate and vasoconstriction. CONCLUSIONS Angles < 60 degrees produce significantly less haemodynamic effects than steeper angles. Increasing tilt angle beyond 60 degrees produces no apparent additional effect on cardiac output or sympathetic tone. Increasing tilt angle beyond 60 degrees confers no additional orthostatic stress and may not affect the sensitivity and specificity of head up tilt testing as previously thought. Sixty degrees of tilt is a more practical angle for support of a syncopal patient and is recommended.

[1]  P. Vardas,et al.  Methodology of head-up tilt testing in patients with unexplained syncope. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  A. Fitzpatrick,et al.  TILTING TOWARDS A DIAGNOSIS IN RECURRENT UNEXPLAINED SYNCOPE , 1989, The Lancet.

[3]  P. Thorén,et al.  Role of cardiac vagal C-fibers in cardiovascular control. , 1979, Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology.

[4]  R. Sheldon,et al.  Methodology of isoproterenol-tilt table testing in patients with syncope. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  M. Thames,et al.  Neural Control Mechanisms and Vasovagal Syncope , 1993, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[6]  C. Gornick,et al.  Provocation of bradycardia and hypotension by isoproterenol and upright posture in patients with unexplained syncope. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  A. Raviele,et al.  Usefulness of head-up tilt test in evaluating patients with syncope of unknown origin and negative electrophysiologic study. , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  B. Wallin,et al.  Sympathetic outflow to muscles during vasovagal syncope. , 1982, Journal of the autonomic nervous system.

[9]  P Bie,et al.  Hypotension induced by passive head-up tilt: endocrine and circulatory mechanisms. , 1986, The American journal of physiology.

[10]  J McMichael,et al.  CARDIAC OUTPUT IN MAN BY A DIRECT FICK METHOD , 1944, British heart journal.

[11]  L E Farhi,et al.  Cardiopulmonary readjustments in passive tilt. , 1979, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[12]  A. Mark The Bezold-Jarisch reflex revisited: clinical implications of inhibitory reflexes originating in the heart. , 1983, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  B. Grubb,et al.  Utility of upright tilt-table testing in the evaluation and management of syncope of unknown origin. , 1991, The American journal of medicine.

[14]  W. Kapoor,et al.  Upright tilt testing in evaluating syncope: a comprehensive literature review. , 1994, The American journal of medicine.

[15]  A. Natale,et al.  Provocation of hypotension during head-up tilt testing in subjects with no history of syncope or presyncope. , 1995, Circulation.

[16]  W. Kapoor,et al.  Tilt table testing for assessing syncope , 1996 .

[17]  P. K. Banerjee,et al.  Orthostatic tolerance of normal Indians and those with suspected abnormal cardiovascular reflex status. , 1986, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[18]  B. Strasberg,et al.  The head-up tilt table test in patients with syncope of unknown origin. , 1989, American heart journal.

[19]  P. Stevens,et al.  Cardiovascular dynamics during orthostasis and the influence of intravascular instrumentation. , 1966, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  M. Brignole,et al.  Nitroglycerin infusion during upright tilt: a new test for the diagnosis of vasovagal syncope. , 1994, American heart journal.

[21]  T. Rector,et al.  Comparison of tilt angles and provocative agents (edrophonium and isoproterenol) to improve head-upright tilt-table testing. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[22]  R. Hainsworth,et al.  Cardiovascular responses to upright tilting in healthy subjects. , 1988, Clinical science.

[23]  F. A. Hellebrandt,et al.  PHYSIOLOGICAL STUDY OF THE VERTICAL STANCE OF MAN , 1943 .

[24]  R. Patterson,et al.  IMPEDANCE CARDIOGRAPHY AS A NONINVASIVE METHOD OF MONITORING CARDIAC FUNCTION AND OTHER PARAMETERS OF THE CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM * , 1970 .

[25]  D. Eugene Hokanson,et al.  An Electrically Calibrated Plethysmograph for Direct Measurement of Limb Blood Flow , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  F. Fouad-Tarazi,et al.  The Usefulness of Head‐Up Tilt Testing and Hemodynamic Investigations in the Workup of Syncope of Unknown Origin , 1988, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.