Sensitivity measures of visuospatial attention.

Measuring visual sensitivity has become popular to determine the spatial deployment of visual attention. Critically, the accuracy of the measurement depends on the quality of the stimulus used. We evaluated the strengths and weaknesses of six commonly used stimuli for assessing visual attention. While preparing an eye movement to a cued item, participants discriminated a stimulus-specific visual feature, either at the cued location or at other equidistant uncued locations. Stimuli differed in their visual features (digital letters, Gabors, crosses, pink noise, random dot kinematograms, and Gabor streams) and their presentation mode (static or dynamic stimuli). We evaluated these stimuli regarding their temporal and spatial specificity and their impact on saccade preparation. We assessed presaccadic visual sensitivity as a correlate of visual spatial attention and discuss the stimulus-specific time course, spatial specificity, and magnitude of the measured attention modulation. Irrespective of the stimulus type, we observed a clear increase of visual sensitivity at the cued location. Time course, spatial specificity, and magnitude of this improvement, however, were specific to each stimulus. Based on our findings, we present guidelines to select the stimulus best suited to measure visuospatial attention depending on the respective research question.

[1]  Eyal M. Reingold,et al.  Saccadic Inhibition in Voluntary and Reflexive Saccades , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Rapid Simultaneous Enhancement of Visual Sensitivity and Perceived Contrast during Saccade Preparation , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Katherine M. Armstrong,et al.  Selective gating of visual signals by microstimulation of frontal cortex , 2003, Nature.

[4]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Measuring presaccadic attention without distorting it: A novel dynamic noise paradigm to investigate visuospatial attention , 2018 .

[5]  L. Cohen,et al.  Cueing Attention after the Stimulus Is Gone Can Retrospectively Trigger Conscious Perception , 2013, Current Biology.

[6]  B McElree,et al.  Covert attention accelerates the rate of visual information processing , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  M. Carrasco.  Visual attention: The past 25 years , 2011, Vision Research.

[8]  Frans W Cornelissen,et al.  The Eyelink Toolbox: Eye tracking with MATLAB and the Psychophysics Toolbox , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[9]  Antimo Buonocore,et al.  Saccadic inhibition underlies the remote distractor effect , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  E. Reingold,et al.  Saccadic Inhibition and Gaze Contingent Research Paradigms , 2000 .

[11]  Yaffa Yeshurun,et al.  Covert attention increases spatial resolution with or without masks: support for signal enhancement. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[12]  H. Deubel.  The time course of presaccadic attention shifts , 2008, Psychological research.

[13]  H. BOUMA,et al.  Interaction Effects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition , 1970, Nature.

[14]  D. Pelli,et al.  Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: distinguishing feature integration from detection. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[15]  S. Treue,et al.  Attentional Modulation Strength in Cortical Area MT Depends on Stimulus Contrast , 2002, Neuron.

[16]  R. Desimone,et al.  Attention Increases Sensitivity of V4 Neurons , 2000, Neuron.

[17]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[18]  T. Moore,et al.  Microstimulation of the frontal eye field and its effects on covert spatial attention. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Properties of attentional selection during the preparation of sequential saccades , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Pre-saccadic remapping relies on dynamics of spatial attention , 2018, bioRxiv.

[22]  M. Carrasco,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Voluntary Attention Enhances Contrast Appearance , 2022 .

[23]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[24]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution , 1998, Nature.

[25]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention , 1989, Vision Research.

[26]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Independent selection of eye and hand targets suggests effector-specific attentional mechanisms , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[28]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Predictive remapping of attention across eye movements , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  Ulrich Ansorge,et al.  Feature-based effects in the coupling between attention and saccades. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[30]  H. Deubel,et al.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism , 1996, Vision Research.

[31]  Eric Castet,et al.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of visual attention during saccade preparation: Independence and coupling between attention and movement planning. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[32]  H E Egeth,et al.  Do reaction time and accuracy measure the same aspects of letter recognition? , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  Viola S. Störmer,et al.  Cross-modal cueing of attention alters appearance and early cortical processing of visual stimuli , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Attentional trade-offs maintain the tracking of moving objects across saccades. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Sustained and transient covert attention enhance the signal via different contrast response functions , 2006, Vision Research.

[36]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[37]  D. Heeger,et al.  Spatial attention affects brain activity in human primary visual cortex. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  S. Treue.  Neural correlates of attention in primate visual cortex , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[39]  H. Deubel,et al.  Independent Allocation of Attention to Eye and Hand Targets in Coordinated Eye-Hand Movements , 2011, Psychological science.

[40]  James R Müller,et al.  Microstimulation of the superior colliculus focuses attention without moving the eyes. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Microsaccades are triggered by low retinal image slip. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Visual attention is not deployed at the endpoint of averaging saccades , 2018, PLoS biology.

[43]  B. Dosher,et al.  The role of attention in the programming of saccades , 1995, Vision Research.

[44]  C. Koch,et al.  Attention activates winner-take-all competition among visual filters , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Attention enhances contrast sensitivity at cued and impairs it at uncued locations , 2005, Vision Research.