Investigating the role of firing-rate normalization and dimensionality reduction in brain-machine interface robustness

The intraday robustness of brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) is important to their clinical viability. In particular, BMIs must be robust to intraday perturbations in neuron firing rates, which may arise from several factors including recording loss and external noise. Using a state-of-the-art decode algorithm, the Recalibrated Feedback Intention Trained Kalman filter (ReFIT-KF) [1] we introduce two novel modifications: (1) a normalization of the firing rates, and (2) a reduction of the dimensionality of the data via principal component analysis (PCA). We demonstrate in online studies that a ReFIT-KF equipped with normalization and PCA (NPC-ReFIT-KF) (1) achieves comparable performance to a standard ReFIT-KF when at least 60% of the neural variance is captured, and (2) is more robust to the undetected loss of channels. We present intuition as to how both modifications may increase the robustness of BMIs, and investigate the contribution of each modification to robustness. These advances, which lead to a decoder achieving state-of-the-art performance with improved robustness, are important for the clinical viability of BMI systems.

[1]  Byron M. Yu,et al.  A high-performance brain–computer interface , 2006, Nature.

[2]  David Sussillo,et al.  A recurrent neural network for closed-loop intracortical brain–machine interface decoders , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[3]  Peter J. Ifft,et al.  Active tactile exploration using a brain – machine – brain interface , 2011 .

[4]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Learning to Move Machines with the Mind , 2022 .

[5]  Andrew S. Whitford,et al.  Cortical control of a prosthetic arm for self-feeding , 2008, Nature.

[6]  David M. Santucci,et al.  Learning to Control a Brain–Machine Interface for Reaching and Grasping by Primates , 2003, PLoS biology.

[7]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Principles of neural ensemble physiology underlying the operation of brain–machine interfaces , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[8]  Vikash Gilja,et al.  A closed-loop human simulator for investigating the role of feedback control in brain-machine interfaces. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Matthew T. Kaufman,et al.  Neural population dynamics during reaching , 2012, Nature.

[10]  John P. Cunningham,et al.  A High-Performance Neural Prosthesis Enabled by Control Algorithm Design , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  Jon A. Mukand,et al.  Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia , 2006, Nature.

[12]  John P. Cunningham,et al.  Gaussian-process factor analysis for low-dimensional single-trial analysis of neural population activity , 2008, NIPS.

[13]  L R Hochberg,et al.  Efficient Decoding With Steady-State Kalman Filter in Neural Interface Systems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[14]  Vikash Gilja,et al.  Long-term Stability of Neural Prosthetic Control Signals from Silicon Cortical Arrays in Rhesus Macaque Motor Cortex , 2010 .