Influence of cabin conditions on placement and response of contaminant detection sensors in a commercial aircraft.

Potential causalities due to airborne disease transmission and risk of chem-bio terrorism in commercial airliner cabins can be reduced by fast responses. Fast responses are only possible by using sensors at appropriate locations in the cabins. Cost, size and weight factors restrict the number of sensors that could be installed inside a cabin. Since release locations and seating patterns of passengers can impact airborne contaminant transports, this study first addressed this impact by using a validated computational fluid dynamics (CFD) program in a four-row mockup of twin-aisle airliner cabin. It was observed that occupancy patterns and release locations have little influence on longitudinal contaminant transports though localized variations of contaminant concentrations may exist. The results show that response time of the sensors is considerably reduced with the increase in number of sensors. If only a single sensor is available across a cabin cross-section then it should be placed at the middle of the ceiling. A cabin model of a fully occupied twin-aisle airliner with 210 seats was also build to study the diverse contaminant distribution trends along cabin length. The results reveal that seating arrangements can make cross-sectional airflow pattern considerably asymmetrical. Similar airflow patterns make the longitudinal contaminant transport in the business and economy classes alike. The presence of galleys greatly affected the longitudinal transport of contaminants in a particular cabin section. The effects due to galleys were less significant if a multipoint sampling system was used. The multipoint sampling system can also reduce the number of sensors required in a cabin.

[1]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[2]  Q. Chen,et al.  Identification of contaminant sources in enclosed environments by inverse CFD modeling. , 2007, Indoor air.

[3]  A. Mangili,et al.  Review Transmission , 2022 .

[4]  David L Powers,et al.  Boundary Value Problems and Partial Differential Equations Ed. 6 , 2009 .

[5]  J. Garland THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE , 1977, The Lancet.

[6]  Peter V. Nielsen,et al.  Application of Computer Simulated Persons in Indoor Environmental Modeling , 2002 .

[7]  G He,et al.  Removal of contaminants released from room surfaces by displacement and mixing ventilation: modeling and validation. , 2005, Indoor air.

[8]  Vijay K. Dhir,et al.  Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B: Fundamentals , 2007 .

[9]  Kow-Tong Chen,et al.  Transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome on aircraft. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Zhiqiang Zhai,et al.  Application of CFD to Predict and Control Chemical and Biological Agent Dispersion in Buildings , 2003 .

[11]  Qingyan Chen COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT k-ε MODELS FOR INDOOR AIR FLOW COMPUTATIONS , 1995 .

[12]  Neil Genzlinger A. and Q , 2006 .

[13]  John D. Spengler,et al.  Indoor Air Quality Factors in Designing a Healthy Building , 2000 .

[14]  K. Castro,et al.  Transmission of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis during a long airplane flight. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  R. G. Darling,et al.  USAMRIID's Medical Management of Biological Casualties Handbook, Fourth Edition , 2001 .

[16]  Tengfei Zhang,et al.  Novel air distribution systems for commercial aircraft cabins , 2007 .

[17]  Mohammad H. Hosni,et al.  Comparison of Large Eddy Simulation Predictions with Particle Image Velocimetry Data for the Airflow in a Generic Cabin Model , 2006 .

[18]  Charles DeJohn,et al.  Responding to medical events during commercial airline flights. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  A J Gadgil,et al.  Pollutant dispersion in a large indoor space. Part 2: Computational fluid dynamics predictions and comparison with a scale model experiment for isothermal flow. , 2004, Indoor air.

[20]  Dennis Anderson,et al.  Annual review of energy and the environment , 1991 .

[21]  Charles E Feigley,et al.  The effect of temperature differences on the distribution of an airborne contaminant in an experimental room. , 2006, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[22]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[23]  Kambiz Vafai,et al.  Numerical heat transfer , 1990 .

[24]  Ericka Stricklin-Parker,et al.  Ann , 2005 .