Uptake of guideline-recommended postpartum diabetes screening among diverse women with gestational diabetes: associations with patient factors in an integrated health system in the USA

Introduction Clinical guidelines urge timely postpartum screening for diabetes among women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), yet patient factors associated with screening uptake remain unclear. We aimed to identify patient factors associated with completed postpartum diabetes screening (2-hour oral glucose tolerance test within 4–12 weeks postpartum), as recommended by the American Diabetes Association (ADA). Research design and methods Within the context of Gestational Diabetes’ Effects on Moms (GEM), a pragmatic cluster randomized trial (2011–2012), we examined survey and electronic health record data to assess clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with uptake of ADA-recommended postpartum screening. Participants included 1642 women (76% racial/ethnic minorities) identified with GDM according to the Carpenter and Coustan criteria in a health system that deploys population-level strategies to promote screening. To contextualize these analyses, screening rates derived from the GEM trial were compared with those in the health system overall using registry data from a concurrent 10-year period (2007–2016, n=21 974). Results Overall 52% (n=857) completed recommended postpartum screening in the analytic sample, comparable to 45.7% (n=10 040) in the registry. Screening in the analytic sample was less likely among women at elevated risk for type 2 diabetes, assessed using items from an ADA risk test (vs non-elevated; adjusted rate ratio (aRR)=0.86 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.98)); perinatal depression (0.88 (0.79 to 0.98)); preterm delivery (0.84 (0.72 to 0.98)); parity ≥2 children (vs 0; 0.80 (0.69 to 0.93)); or less than college education (0.79 (0.72 to 0.86)). Screening was more likely among Chinese Americans (vs White; 1.31 (1.15 to 1.49)); women who attended a routine postpartum visit (5.28 (2.99 to 9.32)); or women who recalled receiving healthcare provider advice about screening (1.31 (1.03 to 1.67)). Conclusions Guideline-recommended postpartum diabetes screening varied by patient clinical and sociodemographic factors. Findings have implications for developing future strategies to improve postpartum care.

[1]  M. Carnethon,et al.  Trends in Gestational Diabetes at First Live Birth by Race and Ethnicity in the US, 2011-2019 , 2022, Obstetric Anesthesia Digest.

[2]  E. Huang,et al.  15. Management of Diabetes in Pregnancy: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022. , 2021, Diabetes care.

[3]  M. Carnethon,et al.  Trends in Gestational Diabetes at First Live Birth by Race and Ethnicity in the US, 2011-2019. , 2021, JAMA.

[4]  B. Shah,et al.  Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Results in Pregnancy Can Be Used to Individualize the Risk of Future Maternal Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus , 2021, Diabetes Care.

[5]  H. Itoh,et al.  Clinical utility of 1‐month postpartum random plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin combined with pre‐pregnancy body mass index for detecting postpartum glucose intolerance in Japanese women with gestational diabetes , 2021, Journal of diabetes investigation.

[6]  S. Sharp,et al.  The absolute and relative risk of type 2 diabetes after gestational diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 129 studies. , 2020, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[7]  G. Colditz,et al.  Factors Associated With Postpartum Diabetes Screening in Women With Gestational Diabetes and Medicaid During Pregnancy. , 2020, American journal of preventive medicine.

[8]  S. Tangjitgamol,et al.  Glucose levels during gestational diabetes pregnancy and the risk of developing postpartum diabetes or prediabetes , 2020, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[9]  M. van de Vyver,et al.  Utility of in-hospital post-delivery fasting plasma glucose to predict postpartum glucose status in women with hyperglycaemia first detected in pregnancy: A prospective cohort study , 2020, PloS one.

[10]  D. Hall,et al.  Evidence to support the classification of hyperglycemia first detected in pregnancy to predict diabetes 6-12 weeks postpartum: A single center cohort study. , 2020, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[11]  G. Colditz,et al.  Maternal Race/Ethnicity and Postpartum Diabetes Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2020, Journal of women's health.

[12]  P. Catalano,et al.  Should women with gestational diabetes be screened at delivery hospitalization for type-2 diabetes? , 2020, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  R. A. Fox,et al.  Women's views on screening for Type 2 diabetes after gestational diabetes: a systematic review, qualitative synthesis and recommendations for increasing uptake , 2019, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[14]  W. H. Pearse,et al.  American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists , 2018, Definitions.

[15]  E. Werner,et al.  Interventions to Improve Rate of Diabetes Testing Postpartum in Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus , 2017, Current Diabetes Reports.

[16]  D. Ross-Degnan,et al.  Variation in Postpartum Glycemic Screening in Women With a History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus , 2016, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  N. Gordon,et al.  The Comparative Effectiveness of Diabetes Prevention Strategies to Reduce Postpartum Weight Retention in Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: The Gestational Diabetes’ Effects on Moms (GEM) Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial , 2015, Diabetes Care.

[18]  M. Gillman,et al.  Understanding why some women with a history of gestational diabetes do not get tested for diabetes. , 2014, Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health.

[19]  N. Gordon,et al.  A pragmatic cluster randomized clinical trial of diabetes prevention strategies for women with gestational diabetes: design and rationale of the Gestational Diabetes’ Effects on Moms (GEM) study , 2014, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[20]  Geoffrey L. Cohen,et al.  The psychology of change: self-affirmation and social psychological intervention. , 2014, Annual review of psychology.

[21]  A. Donner,et al.  Extension of the modified Poisson regression model to prospective studies with correlated binary data , 2013, Statistical methods in medical research.

[22]  Jonathan Van ’t Riet,et al.  Defensive reactions to health-promoting information: an overview and implications for future research , 2013 .

[23]  W. Callaghan,et al.  A system-based intervention to improve postpartum diabetes screening among women with gestational diabetes. , 2012, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[24]  Catherine Kim,et al.  Referral to telephonic nurse management improves outcomes in women with gestational diabetes. , 2012, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[25]  L. Chasan-Taber,et al.  Postpartum Screening for Diabetes Among Women With a History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus , 2011, Preventing chronic disease.

[26]  J. Darbinian,et al.  Disparities in the risk of gestational diabetes by race-ethnicity and country of birth. , 2010, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[27]  J. Lawrence,et al.  Prevalence and Timing of Postpartum Glucose Testing and Sustained Glucose Dysregulation After Gestational Diabetes Mellitus , 2009, Diabetes Care.

[28]  Heejung Bang,et al.  Development and Validation of a Patient Self-assessment Score for Diabetes Risk , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[29]  A. Hingorani,et al.  Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2009, The Lancet.

[30]  T. Strine,et al.  The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population. , 2009, Journal of affective disorders.

[31]  A. Ferrara,et al.  Trends in Postpartum Diabetes Screening and Subsequent Diabetes and Impaired Fasting Glucose Among Women With Histories of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus , 2009, Diabetes Care.

[32]  A. Ferrara,et al.  An Increase in the Incidence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Northern California, 1991–2000 , 2004, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[33]  R. Spitzer,et al.  The PHQ-9 , 2001, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[34]  R. Ruiter,et al.  Increased attention but more efficient disengagement: neuroscientific evidence for defensive processing of threatening health information. , 2010, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[35]  R. Spitzer,et al.  The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. , 2001, Journal of general internal medicine.