Ageing and Switching of the Focus of Attention in Working Memory: Results from a Modified N-Back Task

We conducted two experiments using a modified version of the N-Back task. For younger adults, there was an abrupt increase in reaction time of about 250 ms in passing from N = 1 to N > 1, indicating a cost associated with switching of the focus of attention within working memory. Response time costs remained constant over the range N = 2 to N = 5. Accuracy declined steadily over the full range of N (Experiment 1). Focus switch costs did not interact with either working memory updating (Experiment 1), or global task switching (Experiment 2). There were no age differences in RT costs once general slowing was taken into account, but there was a larger focus-switch-related accuracy cost in older adults than in younger adults. No age sensitivity was found for either updating or global task switching. The results suggest (a) that focus switching is a cognitive primitive, distinct from task switching and updating, and (b) that focus switching shows a specific age-related deficit in the accuracy domain.

[1]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes , 1968, Psychology of Learning and Motivation.

[2]  S. Sternberg.  Memory-scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. , 1969, American scientist.

[3]  D. Kausler.  Experimental psychology, cognition, and human aging , 1982 .

[4]  W. Hockley.  Analysis of response time distributions in the study of cognitive processes. , 1984 .

[5]  T. Salthouse.  A Theory of Cognitive Aging , 1985 .

[6]  J. Birren,et al.  Handbook of the psychology of aging, 3rd ed. , 1985 .

[7]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Working Memory, Comprehension, and Aging: A Review and a New View , 1988 .

[8]  B. Dosher,et al.  Serial position and set size in short-term memory: The time course of recognition , 1989 .

[9]  J. Cerella.  Aging and Information-Processing Rate , 1990 .

[10]  Timothy A. Salthouse,et al.  Theoretical Perspectives on Cognitive Aging , 1991 .

[11]  F. Gregory Ashby,et al.  Response time distributions in memory scanning , 1993 .

[12]  R Kliegl,et al.  Sequential and coordinative complexity: age-based processing limitations in figural transformations. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Aging and inhibition: beyond a unitary view of inhibitory processing in attention. , 1994, Psychology and aging.

[14]  M. Van der Linden,et al.  Age-related differences in updating working memory. , 1994, British journal of psychology.

[15]  N. Cowan.  Attention and Memory: An Integrated Framework , 1995 .

[16]  D. Rubin,et al.  One Hundred Years of Forgetting : A Quantitative Description of Retention , 1996 .

[17]  T. Salthouse.  The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. , 1996, Psychological review.

[18]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Meta-analyses of age-cognition relations in adulthood: estimates of linear and nonlinear age effects and structural models. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  R Kliegl,et al.  Sequential and coordinative complexity in time-accuracy functions for mental arithmetic. , 1997, Psychology and aging.

[20]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  An Invitation to cognitive science , 1997 .

[21]  Hugh Garavan,et al.  Serial attention within working memory , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[22]  S. Sternberg.  Discovering mental processing stages: The method of additive factors. , 1998 .

[23]  P. Verhaeghen,et al.  Aging and the Stroop effect: a meta-analysis. , 1998, Psychology and aging.

[24]  P. Verhaeghen,et al.  Aging and the negative priming effect: a meta-analysis. , 1998, Psychology and aging.

[25]  Cynthia P. May,et al.  Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age. , 1999 .

[26]  A. Hartley,et al.  Age-related differences and similarities in dual-task interference. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  D. Balota,et al.  Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: implications for group differences in response latency. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  M. J. Emerson,et al.  The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex “Frontal Lobe” Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  Raymond J. Shaw,et al.  Attention and Aging: A Functional Perspective , 2000 .

[30]  E. Maylor,et al.  Rejecting the dull hypothesis : the relation between method and theory in cognitive aging research , 2000 .

[31]  S. Sternberg,et al.  Separate modifiability, mental modules, and the use of pure and composite measures to reveal them. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[32]  B McElree,et al.  Working memory and focal attention. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  J. Dumas,et al.  Age Differences in Updating Working Memory: Evidence from the Delayed-Matching-To-Sample Test , 2001 .

[34]  R. Kliegl,et al.  Ageing and executive control , 2001 .

[35]  N. Cowan.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[36]  J. Cerella,et al.  Aging, executive control, and attention: a review of meta-analyses , 2002, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[37]  K. Oberauer.  Access to information in working memory: exploring the focus of attention. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[38]  U. Lindenberger,et al.  Age-Related Changes in Task-Switching Components: The Role of Task Uncertainty , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[39]  Paul Verhaeghen,et al.  Subitizing speed, subitizing range, counting speed, the Stroop effect, and aging: capacity differences and speed equivalence. , 2003, Psychology and aging.

[40]  J. Cerella,et al.  Aging and dual-task performance: a meta-analysis. , 2003, Psychology and aging.