Taxonomy of Digital Platforms: A Business Model Perspective

Digital platforms (DPs) – technical core artifacts augmented by peripheral third-party complementary resources – facilitate the interaction and collaboration of different actors through highly-efficient resource matching. As DPs differ significantly in their configurations and applications, it is important from both a descriptive and a design perspective to define classes of DPs. As an intentionally designed artifact, every classification pursues a certain purpose. In this research, the purpose is to classify DPs from a business model perspective, i.e. to identify DP clusters that each share a similar business model type. We follow Nickerson et al.’s (2013) method for taxonomy development. By validating the conceptually derived design dimensions with ten DP cases, we identify platform structure and platform participants as the major clustering constituent characteristics. Building on the proposed taxonomy, we derive four DP archetypes that follow distinct design configurations, namely business innovation platforms, consumer innovation platforms, business exchange platforms and consumer exchange platforms.

[1]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability , 2004 .

[2]  A. Gawer Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework , 2014 .

[3]  Jan Muntermann,et al.  A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Peter Gomber,et al.  A taxonomy of financial market manipulations: establishing trust and market integrity in the financialized economy through automated fraud detection , 2017, J. Inf. Technol..

[5]  Lihua Huang,et al.  The Role of IS Capabilities in the Development of Multi-Sided Platforms: The Digital Ecosystem Strategy of Alibaba.com , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Deborah Josko,et al.  Platforms , 2020, Writing Compelling Dialogue for Film and TV.

[7]  Mark de Reuver,et al.  The digital platform: a research agenda , 2018, J. Inf. Technol..

[8]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics , 2010 .

[9]  K. Boudreau,et al.  How to Manage Outside Innovation , 2009 .

[10]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[11]  R. Amit,et al.  The Business Model: Recent Developments and Future Research , 2011 .

[12]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  The Architecture of Platforms: A Unified View , 2008 .

[13]  D. Teece Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation , 2010 .

[14]  James F. Moore The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems , 1996 .

[15]  Alexander Osterwalder,et al.  The business model ontology a proposition in a design science approach , 2004 .

[16]  Jacky Akoka,et al.  A Taxonomy of Evaluation Methods for Information Systems Artifacts , 2015, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Systems Competition and Network Effects , 1994 .

[18]  Xiaoyue Jiang,et al.  Platform Ecosystems: How Developers Invert the Firm , 2016, MIS Q..

[19]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  Business Models , 2014, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[20]  Mutaz M. Al-Debei,et al.  Developing a unified framework of the business model concept , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Ron Adner Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[22]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[23]  Sven M. Laudien,et al.  Understanding platform business models: A mixed methods study of marketplaces , 2017, European Management Journal.

[24]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Business models for Internet-based e-procurement systems and B2B electronic markets: an exploratory assessment , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[25]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Platform Ecosystems: Aligning Architecture, Governance, and Strategy , 2013 .

[26]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[27]  Ola Henfridsson,et al.  Balancing platform control and external contribution in third‐party development: the boundary resources model , 2013, Inf. Syst. J..

[28]  A. Gawer,et al.  Towards a Theory of Ecosystems , 2018, Strategic Management Journal.

[29]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Strategies for Two Sided Markets , 2006 .

[30]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  FEDS: a Framework for Evaluation in Design Science Research , 2016, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Yannis Bakos,et al.  The emerging role of electronic marketplaces on the Internet , 1998, CACM.

[32]  Oliver Gassmann,et al.  The Business Model Navigator: 55 Models That Will Revolutionise Your Business , 2014 .