Statistical test of VEP waveform equality

The aim of the study was to describe a theory and method for inferring the statistical significance of a visually evoked cortical potential (VEP) recording. The statistical evaluation is predicated on the pre-stimulus VEP as estimates of the cortical potentials expected when the stimulus does not produce an effect, a mathematical transform to convert the voltages into standard deviations from zero, and a time-series approach for estimating the variability of between-session VEPs under the null hypothesis. Empirical and Monte Carlo analyses address issues concerned with testability, statistical validity, clinical feasibility, as well as limitations of the proposed method. We conclude that visual electrophysiological recordings can be evaluated as a statistical study of n = 1 subject using time-series analysis when confounding effects are adequately controlled. The statistical test can be performed on either a single VEP or the difference between pairs of VEPs.

[1]  E. Edgington.  Statistical inference from N--1 experiments. , 1967, The Journal of psychology.

[2]  R. Srebro,et al.  A bootstrap method to compare the shapes of two scalp fields. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  Francesco Nocera,et al.  Resampling approach to statistical inference: Bootstrapping from event-related potentials data , 2000, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[4]  B. Efron.  The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans , 1987 .

[5]  V. Greenstein,et al.  The effects of glaucoma on the latency of the multifocal visual evoked potential , 2006, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[6]  A comparison of signal detection techniques in the multifocal electroretinogram , 2008, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[7]  A. Achim,et al.  Signal detection in averaged evoked potentials: Monte Carlo comparison of the sensitivity of different methods. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  Jing Lv,et al.  Objective detection of evoked potentials using a bootstrap technique. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[9]  David Friedman,et al.  Bootstrap assessment of the reliability of maxima in surface maps of brain activity of individual subjects derived with electrophysiological and optical methods , 1998 .

[10]  K. Fujii,et al.  Visualization for the analysis of fluid motion , 2005, J. Vis..

[11]  J. Booth,et al.  Resampling-Based Multiple Testing. , 1994 .

[12]  B. Efron,et al.  The Jackknife: The Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans. , 1983 .

[13]  M Bach,et al.  Visual evoked potential-based acuity assessment in normal vision, artificially degraded vision, and in patients , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[14]  J. Odom.  VISUAL EVOKED POTENTIALS STANDARD , 2004 .

[15]  R. Blair,et al.  An alternative method for significance testing of waveform difference potentials. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[16]  F. E. Grubbs.  Procedures for Detecting Outlying Observations in Samples , 1969 .

[17]  U. Böckenholt,et al.  Bootstrapping: applications to psychophysiology. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[18]  Michèle Fabre-Thorpe,et al.  Interaction of top-down and bottom-up processing in the fast visual analysis of natural scenes. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[19]  Richard A. Davis,et al.  Introduction to time series and forecasting , 1998 .

[20]  Ione Fine,et al.  Face adaptation does not improve performance on search or discrimination tasks. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[21]  Vaegan,et al.  Visual evoked potentials standard (2004) , 2004, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[22]  D. Altman,et al.  Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[23]  Mei Ying Boon,et al.  The correlation dimension: a useful objective measure of the transient visual evoked potential? , 2008, Journal of vision.

[24]  Anthony C. Davison,et al.  Bootstrap Methods and Their Application , 1998 .

[25]  J. F. O'Hanlon,et al.  Effects of loratadine and cetirizine on actual driving and psychometric test performance, and EEG during driving , 2004, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[26]  D. Guthrie,et al.  Significance testing of difference potentials. , 1991, Psychophysiology.