Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the breast is being used increasingly in the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer as a complementary modality to mammography and sonography. Although the potential diagnostic value of kinetic curves in DCE-MRI is established, the method for generating kinetic curves is not standardized. The inherent reason that curve identification is needed is that the uptake of contrast agent in a breast lesion is often heterogeneous, especially in malignant lesions. It is accepted that manual region of interest selection in 4D breast magnetic resonance (MR) images to generate the kinetic curve is a time-consuming process and suffers from significant inter- and intraobserver variability. We investigated and developed a fuzzy c-means (FCM) clustering-based technique for automatically identifying characteristic kinetic curves from breast lesions in DCE-MRI of the breast. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images were obtained using a T1-weighted 3D spoiled gradient echo sequence with Gd-DTPA dose of 0.2 mmol/kg and temporal resolution of 69 s. FCM clustering was applied to automatically partition the signal-time curves in a segmented 3D breast lesion into a number of classes (i.e., prototypic curves). The prototypic curve with the highest initial enhancement was selected as the representative characteristic kinetic curve (CKC) of the lesion. Four features were then extracted from each characteristic kinetic curve to depict the maximum contrast enhancement, time to peak, uptake rate, and washout rate of the lesion kinetics. The performance of the kinetic features in the task of distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions was assessed by receiver operating characteristic analysis. With a database of 121 breast lesions (77 malignant and 44 benign cases), the classification performance of the FCM-identified CKCs was found to be better than that from the curves obtained by averaging over the entire lesion and similar to kinetic curves generated from regions drawn within the lesion by a radiologist experienced in breast MRI.

[1]  S. Heywang,et al.  MR imaging of the breast using gadolinium-DTPA. , 1986, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[2]  S. Heywang,et al.  MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. , 1989, Radiology.

[3]  W. Kaiser,et al.  MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. , 1989, Radiology.

[4]  C E Metz,et al.  Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. , 1989, Investigative radiology.

[5]  P. Tofts,et al.  Measurement of the blood‐brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  W. J. Lorenz,et al.  Pharmacokinetic Mapping of the Breast: A New Method for Dynamic MR Mammography , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  A Horsman,et al.  Dynamic MRI of invasive breast cancer: assessment of three region-of-interest analysis methods. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[8]  M D Schnall,et al.  Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. , 1997, Radiology.

[9]  C A Roe,et al.  Statistical Comparison of Two ROC-curve Estimates Obtained from Partially-paired Datasets , 1998, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[10]  M L Giger,et al.  Computerized analysis of breast lesions in three dimensions using dynamic magnetic-resonance imaging. , 1998, Medical physics.

[11]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  D M Ikeda,et al.  Lesion Diagnosis Working Group Report , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  L. Turnbull,et al.  Dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI in the differentiation of breast tumors: User‐defined versus semi‐automated region‐of‐interest analysis , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  C. Kuhl,et al.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? , 1999, Radiology.

[15]  C K Kuhl,et al.  Dynamic image interpretation of MRI of the breast , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  T. Helbich,et al.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. , 2000, European journal of radiology.

[17]  M D Schnall,et al.  Update of breast MR imaging architectural interpretation model. , 2001, Radiology.

[18]  U. Fischer,et al.  International investigation of breast MRI: results of a multicentre study (11 sites) concerning diagnostic parameters for contrast-enhanced MRI based on 519 histopathologically correlated lesions , 2001, European Radiology.

[19]  Elizabeth A Morris,et al.  Breast cancer imaging with MRI. , 2002, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[20]  L. Turnbull,et al.  Textural analysis of contrast‐enhanced MR images of the breast , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  P J Drew,et al.  Current applications and future direction of MR mammography , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.

[22]  Mitchell D Schnall,et al.  Breast MR imaging. , 2003, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[23]  Torsten Rohlfing,et al.  Volume-preserving nonrigid registration of MR breast images using free-form deformation with an incompressibility constraint , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  Chris Wood,et al.  Comparison of automatic time curve selection methods for breast MR CAD , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[25]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized interpretation of breast MRI: investigation of enhancement-variance dynamics. , 2004, Medical physics.

[26]  Yijun Liu,et al.  Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Approximation and Diffusion Anisotropy Characterization in DWI , 2005, IPMI.

[27]  Maryellen L. Giger,et al.  A Fuzzy C-Means (FCM)-Based Approach for Computerized Segmentation of Breast Lesions in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Images1 , 2006 .

[28]  N. Hylton,et al.  Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. , 2006, Radiology.