Border trees of complex networks

The comprehensive characterization of the structure of complex networks is essential to understand the dynamical processes which guide their evolution. The discovery of the scale-free distribution and the small-world properties of real networks were fundamental to stimulate more realistic models and to understand important dynamical processes related to network growth. However, the properties of the network borders (nodes with degree equal to 1), one of its most fragile parts, remained little investigated and understood. The border nodes may be involved in the evolution of structures such as geographical networks. Here we analyze the border trees of complex networks, which are defined as the subgraphs without cycles connected to the remainder of the network (containing cycles) and terminating into border nodes. In addition to describing an algorithm for identification of such tree subgraphs, we also consider how their topological properties can be quantified in terms of their depth and number of leaves. We investigate the properties of border trees for several theoretical models as well as real-world networks. Among the obtained results, we found that more than half of the nodes of some real-world networks belong to the border trees. A power-law with cut-off was observed for the distribution of the depth and number of leaves of the border trees. An analysis of the local role of the nodes in the border trees was also performed.

[1]  F. S. Prout.  Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 2009, The London Medical Journal.

[2]  R. Guimerà,et al.  Classes of complex networks defined by role-to-role connectivity profiles. , 2007, Nature physics.

[3]  V. Latora,et al.  Complex networks: Structure and dynamics , 2006 .

[4]  J. Herskowitz,et al.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA , 1996, Current Biology.

[5]  M E Newman,et al.  Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[7]  Yuval Shavitt,et al.  A model of Internet topology using k-shell decomposition , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  John M. Roberts.  Simple methods for simulating sociomatrices with given marginal totals , 2000, Soc. Networks.

[9]  Chung-Yuan Huang,et al.  Bridge and brick motifs in complex networks , 2007 .

[10]  Stefan Wuchty,et al.  Peeling the yeast protein network , 2005, Proteomics.

[11]  S. Brenner,et al.  The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1986, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[12]  Sergey N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  K-core Organization of Complex Networks , 2005, Physical review letters.

[13]  Shmuel Sattath,et al.  How reliable are experimental protein-protein interaction data? , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  M. Newman,et al.  Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  BERNARD M. WAXMAN,et al.  Routing of multipoint connections , 1988, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[16]  Prasad Tetali,et al.  Simple Markov-Chain Algorithms for Generating Bipartite Graphs and Tournaments (Extended Abstract) , 1999, SODA.

[17]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[18]  P. Holland,et al.  Local Structure in Social Networks , 1976 .

[19]  Ron D. Appel,et al.  ExPASy: the proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[20]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[21]  Luciano da Fontoura Costa,et al.  Protein domain connectivity and essentiality , 2006 .

[22]  George W. Davidson,et al.  Roget's Thesaurus of English Words and Phrases , 1982 .

[23]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs in the transcriptional regulation network of Escherichia coli , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[24]  B. Schwikowski,et al.  A network of protein–protein interactions in yeast , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.

[25]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Internet: Diameter of the World-Wide Web , 1999, Nature.

[26]  Lucas Antiqueira,et al.  Strong correlations between text quality and complex networks features , 2007 .