Low probability of detection underwater acoustic communications using direct-sequence spread spectrum.

Direct-sequence spread spectrum is used for underwater acoustic communications between nodes, at least one of which is moving. At-sea data show that the phase change due to source motion is significant: The differential phase between two adjacent symbols is often larger than the phase difference between symbols. This poses a challenge to phase-detection based receiver algorithms when the source or receiver is moving. A pair of energy detectors that are insensitive to the phase fluctuations is proposed, whose outputs are used to determine the relationship between adjacent symbols. Good performance is achieved for a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) as low as -10 dB based on at-sea data. While the method can be applied to signaling using short code sequences, the focus in this paper is on long code sequences for the purpose of achieving a high processing gain (at the expense of a low data rate), so that communications can be carried out at a low input SNR to minimize the probability of detection (P(D)) by an interceptor. P(D) is calculated for a typical shallow water environment as a function of range for several source levels assuming a broadband energy detector with a known signal bandwidth.

[1]  T.C. Yang,et al.  Low signal-to-noise-ratio underwater acoustic communications using direct-sequence spread-spectrum signals , 2007, OCEANS 2007 - Europe.

[2]  Lee Freitag,et al.  Hypothesis-feedback equalization for direct-sequence spread-spectrum underwater communications , 2000, OCEANS 2000 MTS/IEEE Conference and Exhibition. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37158).

[3]  Wen-Bin Yang,et al.  Performance analysis of direct-sequence spread-spectrum underwater acoustic communications with low signal-to-noise-ratio input signals. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  L. Freitag,et al.  MMSE acquisition of DSSS acoustic communications signals , 2004, Oceans '04 MTS/IEEE Techno-Ocean '04 (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37600).

[5]  T. C. Yang.  Measurements of temporal coherence of sound transmissions through shallow water , 2006 .

[6]  Michael D. Collins,et al.  A higher‐order parabolic equation for wave propagation in an ocean overlying an elastic bottom , 1989 .

[7]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Spread spectrum underwater acoustic telemetry , 1998, IEEE Oceanic Engineering Society. OCEANS'98. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36259).

[8]  Ronald A. Iltis,et al.  A digital DS spread-spectrum receiver with joint channel and Doppler shift estimation , 1991, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[9]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Performance comparison of RAKE and hypothesis feedback direct sequence spread spectrum techniques for underwater communication applications , 2002, OCEANS '02 MTS/IEEE.

[10]  Rodney F. W. Coates,et al.  Underwater Acoustic Systems , 1990 .

[11]  G..  Performance of Optimum and Suboptimum Detectors for Spread Spectrum Waveforms , 2022 .

[12]  J. G. Proakis,et al.  Direct sequence spread spectrum based modem for under water acoustic communication and channel measurements , 1999, Oceans '99. MTS/IEEE. Riding the Crest into the 21st Century. Conference and Exhibition. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.99CH37008).

[13]  J. K. Townsend,et al.  A method and metric for quantitatively defining low probability of detection , 1998, IEEE Military Communications Conference. Proceedings. MILCOM 98 (Cat. No.98CH36201).

[14]  J. H. Park.  LPI Techniques in the Underwater Acoustic Channel , 1986, MILCOM 1986 - IEEE Military Communications Conference: Communications-Computers: Teamed for the 90's.

[15]  J. I. Mararm,et al.  Energy Detection of Unknown Deterministic Signals , 2022 .

[16]  T. C. Yang.  Temporal fluctuations of broadband channel impulse functions and underwater acoustic communications at 2-5 kHz/sup 1/ , 2002, OCEANS '02 MTS/IEEE.