Connected Chemistry—Incorporating Interactive Simulations into the Chemistry Classroom

The aim of this paper is to describe a novel modeling and simulation package, connected chemistry, and assess its impact on students' understanding of chemistry. Connected chemistry was implemented inside the NetLogo modeling environment. Its design goal is to present a variety of chemistry concepts from the perspective of “emergent phenomena”—that is, how macro-level patterns in chemistry result from the interactions of many molecules on a submicro-level. The connected chemistry modeling environment provides students with the opportunity to observe and explore these interactions in a simulated environment that enables them to develop a deeper understanding of chemistry concepts and processes in both the classroom and laboratory. Here, we present the conceptual foundations of instruction using connected chemistry and the results of a small study that explored its potential benefits. A three-part, 90-min interview was administered to six undergraduate science majors regarding the concept of chemical equilibrium. Several commonly reported misconceptions about chemical equilibrium arose during the interview. Prior to their interaction with connected chemistry, students relied on memorized facts to explain chemical equilibrium and rigid procedures to solve chemical equilibrium problems. Using connected chemistry students employed problem-solving techniques characterized by stronger attempts at conceptual understanding and logical reasoning.

[1]  A. H. Johnstone,et al.  The development of chemistry teaching: a changing response to changing demand , 1993 .

[2]  M. Nakhleh.  Why some students don't learn chemistry: Chemical misconceptions , 1992 .

[3]  D. Perkins,et al.  TEACHING FOR UNDERSTANDING , 1993 .

[4]  Victor M. S. Gil,et al.  The Complexity of Teaching and Learning Chemical Equilibrium , 2000 .

[5]  Uri Wilensky,et al.  GasLab—an Extensible Modeling Toolkit for Exploring Micro- and Macro- Views of Gases , 1999 .

[6]  Jan H. van Driel,et al.  Introducing Dynamic Equilibrium as an Explanatory Model , 1999 .

[7]  Anil C. Banerjee,et al.  Misconceptions of students and teachers in chemical equilibrium. , 1991 .

[8]  Richard W. Schwenz,et al.  College physical chemistry students' conceptions of equilibrium and fundamental thermodynamics , 1998 .

[9]  R. Kozma,et al.  Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena , 1997 .

[10]  Nancy Roberts,et al.  Modeling as Inquiry Activity in School Science: What’s the Point? , 1999 .

[11]  Anil C. Banerjee,et al.  Teaching Chemical Equilibrium and Thermodynamics in Undergraduate General Chemistry Classes. , 1995 .

[12]  Kirk W. Voska,et al.  Identification and Analysis of Student Conceptions Used to Solve Chemical Equilibrium Problems , 2000 .

[13]  M. Resnick,et al.  Thinking in Levels: A Dynamic Systems Approach to Making Sense of the World , 1999 .

[14]  Joan Josep Solaz Portolés,et al.  Students' and teachers' misapplication of le chatelier's principle: Implications for the teaching of chemical equilibrium , 1995 .

[15]  George M. Bodner,et al.  Why changing the curriculum may not be enough , 1992 .

[16]  Wallace Feurzeig,et al.  Modeling and Simulation in Science and Mathematics Education , 1999, Modeling Dynamic Systems.

[17]  Hartmut Bossel,et al.  Modeling and simulation , 1994 .

[18]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  Teaching for understanding: Exemplary practice in high school chemistry , 1989 .

[19]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom , 2001 .

[20]  Uri Wilensky,et al.  A Hands-on Modeling Approach to Evolution: Learning about the Evolution of Cooperation and Altruism Through Multi-Agent Modeling - The EACH Project , 2000 .

[21]  Uri Wilensky,et al.  ConnectedScience: Learning Biology through Constructing and Testing Computational Theories -- an Embodied Modeling Approach , 1998 .