Grand Field Challenges for Cognitive Neuroergonomics in the Coming Decade

1 Biological Psychology and Neuroergonomics, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany, Northrop Grumman Corporation, McLean, VA, United States, Department of Psychology, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS, United States, 4 ISAE-SUPAERO, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France, 5 Aquitaine Institute for Cognitive and Integrative Neuroscience, CNRS and University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States, 7 Institute of Neuroscience, National Research Council of Italy, Parma, Italy

[1]  Waldemar Karwowski,et al.  Brain at Work and in Everyday Life as the Next Frontier: Grand Field Challenges for Neuroergonomics , 2020, Frontiers in Neuroergonomics.

[2]  Yibo Zhu,et al.  Neuroergonomics Metrics to evaluate Exoskeleton based Gait Rehabilitation , 2020, 2020 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[3]  Klaus Gramann,et al.  Identifying key factors for improving ICA-based decomposition of EEG data in mobile and stationary experiments , 2020, bioRxiv.

[4]  Yibo Zhu,et al.  A neurophysiological approach to assess training outcome under stress: A virtual reality experiment of industrial shutdown maintenance using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) , 2020, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[5]  Riitta Salmelin,et al.  Issues and recommendations from the OHBM COBIDAS MEEG committee for reproducible EEG and MEG research , 2020, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  Philippe Cardou,et al.  Adding Haptic Feedback to Virtual Environments With a Cable-Driven Robot Improves Upper Limb Spatio-Temporal Parameters During a Manual Handling Task , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[7]  E. Wascher,et al.  Neuroergonomics on the go. A preview of the potential of mobile EEG for work-place evaluation and design , 2020 .

[8]  Klaus Gramann,et al.  Identifying key factors for improving ICA-based decomposition of EEG data in mobile and stationary experiments , 2020, bioRxiv.

[9]  Ranjana K Mehta,et al.  Methodological Approaches and Recommendations for Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Applications in HF/E Research , 2020, Hum. Factors.

[10]  K. Gramann,et al.  Landmark-Based Navigation Instructions Improve Incidental Spatial Knowledge Acquisition in Real-World Environments , 2019 .

[11]  Ryan McKendrick,et al.  Theories and Methods for Labeling Cognitive Workload: Classification and Transfer Learning , 2019, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[12]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  EEG-BIDS, an extension to the brain imaging data structure for electroencephalography , 2019, Scientific Data.

[13]  Chin-Teng Lin,et al.  Detecting Visuo-Haptic Mismatches in Virtual Reality using the Prediction Error Negativity of Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2019, CHI.

[14]  Fabien Lotte,et al.  Monitoring Pilot’s Mental Workload Using ERPs and Spectral Power with a Six-Dry-Electrode EEG System in Real Flight Conditions , 2019, Sensors.

[15]  Robert T. Thibault,et al.  Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf checklist) , 2019, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  Paweł Strojny,et al.  Can Simulator Sickness Be Avoided? A Review on Temporal Aspects of Simulator Sickness , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[17]  Hristos Doucouliagos,et al.  What Meta-Analyses Reveal About the Replicability of Psychological Research , 2018, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  Francisco J. Parada.  Understanding Natural Cognition in Everyday Settings: 3 Pressing Challenges , 2018, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[19]  K. Gramann,et al.  Human cortical dynamics during full-body heading changes , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[20]  Lucian Gheorghe,et al.  Decoding Neural Correlates of Cognitive States to Enhance Driving Experience , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence.

[21]  Thibault Gateau,et al.  In silico vs. Over the Clouds: On-the-Fly Mental State Estimation of Aircraft Pilots, Using a Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy Based Passive-BCI , 2018, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[22]  Janna Protzak,et al.  Investigating Established EEG Parameter During Real-World Driving , 2018, bioRxiv.

[23]  Ferran Argelaguet,et al.  “Do You Feel in Control?”: Towards Novel Approaches to Characterise, Manipulate and Measure the Sense of Agency in Virtual Environments , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[24]  S. Stuart,et al.  fNIRS response during walking — Artefact or cortical activity? A systematic review , 2017, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[25]  Carryl L. Baldwin,et al.  Detecting and Quantifying Mind Wandering during Simulated Driving , 2017, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[26]  Stephen H. Fairclough,et al.  Editorial: Trends in Neuroergonomics , 2017, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[27]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Prefrontal Hemodynamics of Physical Activity and Environmental Complexity During Cognitive Work , 2017, Hum. Factors.

[28]  Brian Litt,et al.  Enabling an Open Data Ecosystem for the Neurosciences , 2016, Neuron.

[29]  Sotiris Makris,et al.  Human–robot interaction review and challenges on task planning and programming , 2016, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[30]  Klaus Gramann,et al.  Mobile Brain/Body Imaging (MoBI) of Physical Interaction with Dynamically Moving Objects , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[31]  J Anthony Movshon,et al.  Putting big data to good use in neuroscience , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  D. Barch,et al.  Introduction to the special issue on reliability and replication in cognitive and affective neuroscience research , 2013, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[33]  Carryl L. Baldwin,et al.  Adaptive training using an artificial neural network and EEG metrics for within- and cross-task workload classification , 2012, NeuroImage.

[34]  Kelvin S. Oie,et al.  Cognition in action: imaging brain/body dynamics in mobile humans , 2011, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[35]  Mohan M. Trivedi,et al.  On the Roles of Eye Gaze and Head Dynamics in Predicting Driver's Intent to Change Lanes , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[36]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Linking brain, mind and behavior. , 2008, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[37]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Neuroergonomics: Research and practice , 2003 .

[38]  George Chryssolouris,et al.  A virtual reality-based experimentation environment for the verification of human-related factors in assembly processes , 2000 .

[39]  M. Plank,et al.  The Use of Electroencephalography in Neuroergonomics , 2019, Neuroergonomics.

[40]  Ryan McKendrick.  Mobile Neuroergonomics , 2019, Neuroergonomics.

[41]  Lukas Gehrke,et al.  MoBI—Mobile Brain/Body Imaging , 2019, Neuroergonomics.

[42]  Fouad Bennis,et al.  Predicting real-world ergonomic measurements by simulation in a virtual environment , 2011 .

[43]  Andreas Bye,et al.  Simulator-based Human Factors Studies Across 25 Years , 2011 .

[44]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Simulator Studies: The Next Best Thing? , 2010 .

[45]  S. Bunce,et al.  Functional near-infrared neuroimaging , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[46]  J. Abedi.  Issues and recommendations concerning COVID-19 vaccine rollout The Independent SAGE Report 25 , 2000 .