Dazzled by diesel? The impact on carbon dioxide emissions of the shift to diesels in Europe through 2009

This paper identifies trends in new gasoline and diesel passenger car characteristics in the European Union between 1995 and 2009. By 2009 diesels had captured over 55% of the new vehicle market. While the diesel version of a given car model may have as much as 35% lower fuel use/km and 25% lower CO2 emissions than its gasoline equivalent, diesel buyers have chosen increasingly large and more powerful cars than the gasoline market. As a result, new diesels bought in 2009 had only 2% lower average CO2 emissions than new gasoline cars, a smaller advantage than in 1995. A Laspeyres decomposition investigates which factors were important contributors to the observed emission reductions and which factors offset savings in other areas. More than 95% of the reduction in CO2 emissions per km from new vehicles arose because both diesel and gasoline new vehicle emissions/km fell, and only 5% arose because of the shift from gasoline to diesel technology. Increases in vehicle mass and power for both gasoline and diesel absorbed much of the technological efficiency improvements offered by both technologies. We also observe changes in the gasoline and diesel fleets in eight EU countries and find changes in fuel and emissions intensities consistent with the changes in new vehicles reported. While diesel cars continue to be driven far farther than gasoline cars, we attribute only some of this difference to a “rebound effect”. We conclude that while diesel technology has permitted significant fuel savings, the switch from gasoline to diesel in the new vehicle market contributed little itself to the observed reductions in CO2 emissions from new vehicles.

[1]  Lee Schipper,et al.  Are We Reaching Peak Travel? Trends in Passenger Transport in Eight Industrialized Countries , 2010 .

[2]  Theodoros Zachariadis The effect of improved safety on fuel economy of European cars , 2008 .

[3]  Frances Sprei Energy efficiency versus gains in consumer amenities: examples from passenger cars and the Swedish building sector , 2010 .

[4]  B. W. Ang,et al.  A survey of index decomposition analysis in energy and environmental studies , 2000 .

[5]  Lee Schipper,et al.  Disappointed by Diesel? , 2009 .

[6]  Lee Schipper,et al.  New car test and actual fuel economy: yet another gap? , 1994 .

[7]  Lee Schipper,et al.  Diesels in Europe: Analysis of Characteristics, Usage Patterns, Energy Savings and CO 2 Emission Implications , 2002 .

[8]  Lee Schipper,et al.  Automobile use, fuel economy and CO2 emissions in industrialized countries: Encouraging trends through 2008? , 2011 .

[9]  Aie Transport Energy and CO2 : Moving towards Sustainability , 2009 .

[10]  B. W. Ang,et al.  The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis: a practical guide , 2005 .

[11]  Theodoros Zachariadis,et al.  On the baseline evolution of automobile fuel economy in Europe , 2006 .

[12]  K. Small,et al.  Induced demand and rebound effects in road transport , 2010 .

[13]  Lee Schipper,et al.  Impact of New Passenger Vehicle Changes and the Shift to Diesel on European Union’s CO2 Emissions Intensity , 2011 .

[14]  Frances Sprei Energy Efficiency Versus Gains in Consumer Amenities , 2010 .

[15]  Z. Wadud New vehicle fuel economy in the UK: Impact of the recession and recent policies , 2014 .

[16]  Frank J. Convery,et al.  The impact of fiscal and other measures on new passenger car sales and CO2 emissions intensity: Evidence from Europe , 2009 .

[17]  Søren Løkke,et al.  Can Rebound Effects Explain Why Sustainable Mobility Has Not Been Achieved , 2014 .

[18]  Zissis Samaras,et al.  A quantitative analysis of the European Automakers’ voluntary commitment to reduce CO2 emissions from new passenger cars based on independent experimental data , 2007 .

[19]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Environmental Performance and firm strategies in the Dutch automotive sector , 2013 .