Manifold learning to interpret JET high-dimensional operational space

In this paper, the problem of visualization and exploration of JET high-dimensional operational space is considered. The data come from plasma discharges selected from JET campaigns from C15 (year 2005) up to C27 (year 2009). The aim is to learn the possible manifold structure embedded in the data and to create some representations of the plasma parameters on low-dimensional maps, which are understandable and which preserve the essential properties owned by the original data.A crucial issue for the design of such mappings is the quality of the dataset. This paper reports the details of the criteria used to properly select suitable signals downloaded from JET databases in order to obtain a dataset of reliable observations. Moreover, a statistical analysis is performed to recognize the presence of outliers. Finally data reduction, based on clustering methods, is performed to select a limited and representative number of samples for the operational space mapping.The high-dimensional operational space of JET is mapped using a widely used manifold learning method, the self-organizing maps. The results are compared with other data visualization methods. The obtained maps can be used to identify characteristic regions of the plasma scenario, allowing to discriminate between regions with high risk of disruption and those with low risk of disruption.

[1]  A. Murari,et al.  Unbiased and non-supervised learning methods for disruption prediction at JET , 2009 .

[2]  S. P. Lloyd,et al.  Least squares quantization in PCM , 1982, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[3]  Alessandra Fanni,et al.  Mapping of the ASDEX Upgrade operational space for disruption prediction , 2011 .

[4]  Alessandra Fanni,et al.  Adaptive mapping of the plasma operational space of ASDEX Upgrade for disruption prediction , 2012 .

[5]  J. Dunn Well-Separated Clusters and Optimal Fuzzy Partitions , 1974 .

[6]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[7]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-Organization and Associative Memory , 1988 .

[8]  G. Pautasso,et al.  Prediction of disruptions on ASDEX Upgrade using discriminant analysis , 2011 .

[9]  Daniel Asimov,et al.  The grand tour: a tool for viewing multidimensional data , 1985 .

[10]  Massimo Camplani,et al.  Tracking of the Plasma States in a Nuclear Fusion Device Using SOMs , 2009, EANN.

[11]  P. Stott,et al.  High-density discharges with gettered torus walls in DITE , 1977 .

[12]  David Ward,et al.  Impurity influx model of fast tokamak disruptions , 1992 .

[13]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  GTM: The Generative Topographic Mapping , 1998, Neural Computation.

[14]  Andrea Murari,et al.  An advanced disruption predictor for JET tested in a simulated real-time environment , 2010 .

[15]  Angel R. Martinez,et al.  : Exploratory data analysis with MATLAB ® , 2007 .

[16]  L. Berry,et al.  Some observations on maximum densities in tokamak experiments , 1976 .

[17]  B. Cannas,et al.  An adaptive real-time disruption predictor for ASDEX Upgrade , 2010 .

[18]  Garrison W. Cottrell,et al.  Non-Linear Dimensionality Reduction , 1992, NIPS.

[19]  Andreas Buja,et al.  Grand tour methods: an outline , 1986 .

[20]  M. Greenwald Density limits in toroidal plasmas , 2002 .

[21]  Jet Efda Contributors,et al.  Development of an efficient real-time disruption predictor from scratch on JET and implications for ITER , 2013 .

[22]  I. Jolliffe Principal Component Analysis , 2002 .