A simplified management of the in situ evaluation of feedstuffs in ruminants: Application to the study of the digestive availability of protein and amino acids corrected for the ruminal microbial contamination

The ruminal effective degradability (RED) and intestinal effective digestibility (IED) for dry matter, crude protein (CP) and amino acids (AA) were estimated by a simplified in situ method using pooled samples from rumen-incubated residues, which represented the ruminal outflow of undegraded feed. The effect of microbial contamination in the rumen was corrected using 15N infusion techniques. Studies were carried out for soybean meal (SBM), barley grain (BG) and lucerne hay (LH) in three wethers cannulated in the rumen and the duodenum. Uncorrected values of RED for CP obtained either by mathematical integration or our simplified method were similar in all feeds. Microbial N in the pooled samples of SBM, BG and LH were 2%, 11% and 24% of total N, respectively. However, intestinal incubation eliminated this microbial charge by 100%, 99% and 88%, respectively. With microbial corrections, RED showed an increase, and IED showed a decrease, except for SBM. With this correction, intestinal digested CP was reduced by 2% in SBM, 13% in BG and 34% in LH. Corrected IED of AA was relatively similar in SBM (97–99%). However, large variations were observed in BG (74–93%) and in LH (10–88%). Digestion in the rumen and intestine changed the essential AA pattern. Overall, our results support that AA digestion is affected by the characteristics of their radicals and their contents in plant cell wall proteins. The accurate estimation of feed metabolisable AA or protein requires effective measures that are corrected by ruminal microbial contamination. The proposed in situ method largely simplifies these tasks and allows a more complete and less expensive feed evaluation.

[1]  L. Phillip,et al.  Ruminal degradability and intestinal digestibility of protein and amino acids in treated soybean meal products. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[2]  C. Rodríguez,et al.  In situ study of the relevance of bacterial adherence to feed particles for the contamination and accuracy of rumen degradability estimates for feeds of vegetable origin , 2006, British Journal of Nutrition.

[3]  C. Centeno,et al.  Protein value for ruminants of a sample of whole cottonseed , 2006 .

[4]  Javier González,et al.  Effects of considering the rate of comminution of particles and microbial contamination on accuracy of in situ studies of feed protein degradability in ruminants , 2006 .

[5]  Juliet A. Gerrard,et al.  Protein–protein crosslinking in food: methods, consequences, applications , 2002 .

[6]  Javier González,et al.  In situ evaluation of the protein value of soybean meal and processed full fat soybeans for ruminants , 2002 .

[7]  Javier González,et al.  Effect of diet forage to concentrate ratio on rumen degradability and post-ruminal availability of protein from fresh and dried lucerne , 2002 .

[8]  C. Centeno,et al.  In situ rumen degradation of amino acids from different feeds corrected for microbial contamination , 2001 .

[9]  C. Centeno,et al.  Rumen effective degradability of amino acids from soybean meal corrected for microbial contamination. , 2000, Reproduction, nutrition, development.

[10]  C. Centeno,et al.  Composition of bacteria harvested from the liquid and solid fractions of the rumen of sheep as influenced by feed intake. , 2000, The British journal of nutrition.

[11]  E. Prestløkken Ruminal degradability and intestinal digestibility of protein and amino acids in barley and oats expander-treated at various intensities , 1999 .

[12]  F. Masoero,et al.  Effect of fat coating on rumen degradation and intestinal digestibility of soybean meal , 1999 .

[13]  M. Alvir,et al.  Estimation of intestinal digestibility of undegraded sunflower meal protein from nylon bag measurements. A mathematical model. , 1999, Reproduction, nutrition, development.

[14]  Javier González,et al.  Rumen degradability and microbial contamination of fish meal and meat meal measured by the in situ technique , 1998 .

[15]  W. Mostert,et al.  Digestion of feed amino acids in the rumen and small intestine of dairy cows measured with nylon-bag techniques , 1997, British Journal of Nutrition.

[16]  C. Martin,et al.  Influence of sampling time and diet on amino acid composition of protozoal and bacterial fractions from bovine ruminal contents. , 1996, Journal of animal science.

[17]  H. Meissner,et al.  Amino acid profile and intestinal digestibility in dairy cows of rumen-undegradable protein from various feedstuffs. , 1994, Journal of dairy science.

[18]  A. Showalter,et al.  Structure and function of plant cell wall proteins. , 1993, The Plant cell.

[19]  P. V. Soest,et al.  Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. , 1991, Journal of dairy science.

[20]  C. Demarquilly,et al.  Comparison between the mechanism of protein degradation of two cereals by enzymatic and in situ methods, using gel electrophoresis , 1991 .

[21]  B. Stefanon,et al.  Change in amino acid composition of different protein sources after rumen incubation , 1989 .

[22]  R. Shanks,et al.  EFFECTS OF RUMINAL EXPOSURE ON THE AMINO ACID PROFILE OF FEEDS , 1987 .

[23]  J. Murphy,et al.  Mobile nylon bag for estimating intestinal availability of rumen undegradable protein. , 1987, Journal of dairy science.

[24]  T. Varvikko Microbially corrected amino acid composition of rumen-undegraded feed protein and amino acid degradability in the rumen of feeds enclosed in nylon bags , 1986, British Journal of Nutrition.

[25]  J. Lindberg,et al.  Estimation of microbial nitrogen in nylon-bag residues by feed 15N dilution , 1985, British Journal of Nutrition.

[26]  T. Varvikko,et al.  The effect of formaldehyde treatment of soya-bean meal and rapeseed meal on the amino acid profiles and acid-pepsin solubility of rumen undegraded protein , 1983, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[27]  W. Horwitz Official Methods of Analysis , 1980 .

[28]  E. R. Ørskov,et al.  The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage , 1979, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[29]  Fred J. Baur,et al.  The Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) , 1977 .

[30]  W. Grovum,et al.  Rate of passage of digesta in sheep , 1973, British Journal of Nutrition.

[31]  V. Williams Rate of passage of digesta in sheep 4." Passage of marker through the alimentary tract and the biological relevance of rate-constants derived from the changes in concentration of marker in faeces , 2005 .

[32]  D. Sauvant TABLE DE COMPOSITION ET DE VALEUR NUTRITIVE DES MATIERES PREMIERES DESTINEES AUX ANIMAUX DELEVAGE , 2004 .

[33]  Javier González,et al.  In situ intestinal digestibility of dry matter and crude protein of cereal grains and rapeseed in sheep. , 2003, Reproduction, nutrition, development.

[34]  E. Prestløkken,et al.  Effective rumen degradability and intestinal indigestibility of individual amino acids in solvent-extracted soybean meal (SBM) and xylose-treated SBM (SoyPass) determined in situ. , 2000 .

[35]  Keshun Liu,et al.  Chemistry and Nutritional Value of Soybean Components , 1997 .

[36]  Van Soest Carbohydrate methodology, metabolism, and nutritional implications in dairy cattle : Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition , 1991 .

[37]  R. Jarrige Ruminant nutrition : recommended allowances and feed tables , 1989 .

[38]  T. Hvelplund Digestibility of rumen microbial protein and undegraded dietary protein estimated in the small intestine of sheep and by in sacco procedure [nylon bag technique, amino acids absorbable in the small intestine (AAT)] , 1985 .

[39]  D. Bozon,et al.  APPENDIX – AMINO ACID COMPOSITION OF FEEDSTUFFS , 1979 .