The Importance of Shroud Leakage Modeling in Multistage Turbine Flow Calculations

Three-dimensional steady multistage calculations, using the mixing plane approach, are compared with experimental measurement in a low-speed three-stage model turbine. The comparisons are made with two levels of shroud seal clearance, one representative of a real turbine and one with minimal seal clearance and almost no shroud leakage. Three different calculations are compared. The first computes the main blade path with no modeling of shroud leakage. The second includes a simple model of shroud leakage using sources and sinks on the end-walls, and the third is a multiblock calculation with all leakage paths and cavities computed. It is found that neglect of shroud leakage makes the computed velocity profiles and loss distributions significantly different to those measured. Simple modeling of shroud leakage gives some improvement but full calculation of the leakage flows and cavities is necessary to obtain good agreement between calculation and measurement.

[1]  Mark G. Turner,et al.  Three-Dimensional Navier-Stokes Computations of Transonic Fan Flow Using an Explicit Flow Solver and an Implicit κ–ϵ Solver , 1992 .

[2]  William N. Dawes,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics for turbomachinery design , 1998 .

[3]  Jochen Gier,et al.  Interaction of Shroud Leakage Flow and Main Flow in a Three-Stage LP Turbine , 2003 .

[4]  William N. Dawes,et al.  Towards Improved Throughflow Capability: The Use of 3D Viscous Flow Solvers in a Multistage Environment , 1990 .

[5]  A. Giboni,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Investigation Into the Unsteady Interaction of Labyrinth Seal Leakage Flow and Main Flow in a 1.5-Stage Axial Turbine , 2004 .

[6]  Reza S. Abhari,et al.  Making Use of Labyrinth Interaction Flow , 2007 .

[7]  John D. Denton,et al.  The Control of Shroud Leakage Flows to Reduce Aerodynamic Losses in a Low Aspect Ratio, Shrouded Axial Flow Turbine , 2000 .

[8]  Christian Lerner,et al.  The Influence of the Clearance of Shrouded Rotor Blades on the Development of the Flowfield and Losses in the Subsequent Stator , 2000 .

[9]  Ron-Ho Ni,et al.  Prediction of 3D multi-stage turbine flow field using a multiple-grid Euler solver , 1989 .

[10]  C. Hah,et al.  Three-Dimensional Flowfields Inside a Transonic Compressor With Swept Blades , 1990 .

[11]  Theodore H. Okiishi,et al.  Modeling Shrouded Stator Cavity Flows in Axial-Flow Compressors , 2000 .

[12]  C. R. Lejambre,et al.  1995 ASME Gas Turbine Award Paper: Development and Application of a Multistage Navier–Stokes Flow Solver: Part II—Application to a High-Pressure Compressor Design , 1998 .

[13]  Jürgen F. Mayer,et al.  Simulation of the Interaction of Labyrinth Seal Leakage Flow and Main Flow in an Axial Turbine , 2002 .

[14]  J. D. Denton,et al.  The Calculation of Three-Dimensional Viscous Flow Through Multistage Turbomachines , 1992 .

[15]  Scott D. Hunter,et al.  Endwall Cavity Flow Effects on Gaspath Aerodynamics in an Axial Flow Turbine: Part II — Source Term Model Development , 2000 .

[16]  John J. Adamczyk,et al.  Simulation of three-dimensional viscous flow within a multistage turbine , 1990 .

[17]  Dieter Bohn,et al.  Influence of Open and Closed Shroud Cavities on the Flowfield in a 2-Stage Turbine With Shrouded Blades , 2003 .