Efficient CRISPR-mediated base editing in Agrobacterium spp.

Significance Agrobacteria are plant-pathogenic bacteria that can deliver DNA to plant cells as part of their infection strategy. This property has been used for decades to generate transgenic plants and, more recently, to deliver gene-editing reagents to plant cells. Notwithstanding their importance for research and industry, laboratory strains have not been improved much over the years and several aspects of Agrobacterium biology and pathogenesis remain poorly understood. Here, we developed a CRISPR-mediated base-editing approach to efficiently modify the genome of Agrobacterium. We show that single-nucleotide changes can be introduced at targeted positions in both the Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Agrobacterium rhizogenes genomes. Whole-genome analysis of edited strains revealed only a limited number of unintentional mutations. Agrobacterium spp. are important plant pathogens that are the causative agents of crown gall or hairy root disease. Their unique infection strategy depends on the delivery of part of their DNA to plant cells. Thanks to this capacity, these phytopathogens became a powerful and indispensable tool for plant genetic engineering and agricultural biotechnology. Although Agrobacterium spp. are standard tools for plant molecular biologists, current laboratory strains have remained unchanged for decades and functional gene analysis of Agrobacterium has been hampered by time-consuming mutation strategies. Here, we developed clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-mediated base editing to enable the efficient introduction of targeted point mutations into the genomes of both Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Agrobacterium rhizogenes. As an example, we generated EHA105 strains with loss-of-function mutations in recA, which were fully functional for maize (Zea mays) transformation and confirmed the importance of RolB and RolC for hairy root development by A. rhizogenes K599. Our method is highly effective in 9 of 10 colonies after transformation, with edits in at least 80% of the cells. The genomes of EHA105 and K599 were resequenced, and genome-wide off-target analysis was applied to investigate the edited strains after curing of the base editor plasmid. The off-targets present were characteristic of Cas9-independent off-targeting and point to TC motifs as activity hotspots of the cytidine deaminase used. We anticipate that CRISPR-mediated base editing is the start of “engineering the engineer,” leading to improved Agrobacterium strains for more efficient plant transformation and gene editing.

[1]  Edward W. Davis,et al.  Unexpected conservation and global transmission of agrobacterial virulence plasmids , 2020, Science.

[2]  Nicole M. Gaudelli,et al.  Cytosine base editors with minimized unguided DNA and RNA off-target events and high on-target activity , 2020, Nature Communications.

[3]  J. Keilwagen,et al.  Highly efficient multiplex editing: One-shot generation of 8x Nicotiana benthamiana and 12x Arabidopsis mutants , 2020, bioRxiv.

[4]  Jonathan Yen,et al.  Directed evolution of adenine base editors with increased activity and therapeutic application , 2020, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  K. Oksman-Caldentey,et al.  Hairy Root Cultures—A Versatile Tool With Multiple Applications , 2020, Frontiers in Plant Science.

[6]  David R. Liu,et al.  Evaluation and Minimization of Cas9-Independent Off-Target DNA Editing by Cytosine Base Editors , 2020, Nature Biotechnology.

[7]  A. A. Zimin,et al.  Multiplex genome editing using a dCas9-cytidine deaminase fusion in Streptomyces , 2019, Science China Life Sciences.

[8]  D. Voytas,et al.  Plant gene editing through de novo induction of meristems , 2019, Nature Biotechnology.

[9]  Elizabeth A. Ainsworth,et al.  Genetic strategies for improving crop yields , 2019, Nature.

[10]  David R. Liu,et al.  Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA , 2019, Nature.

[11]  Hiroshi Ezura,et al.  Super-Agrobacterium ver. 4: Improving the Transformation Frequencies and Genetic Engineering Possibilities for Crop Plants , 2019, Front. Plant Sci..

[12]  S. Lee,et al.  Highly efficient DSB-free base editing for streptomycetes with CRISPR-BEST , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  V. Citovsky,et al.  Pathways of DNA Transfer to Plants from Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Related Bacterial Species. , 2019, Annual review of phytopathology.

[14]  David R. Liu,et al.  Continuous evolution of base editors with expanded target compatibility and improved activity , 2019, Nature Biotechnology.

[15]  Weihong Jiang,et al.  CRISPR–Cas9D10A nickase‐assisted base editing in the solvent producer Clostridium beijerinckii , 2019, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[16]  P. Zambryski,et al.  GROWTH POLE RING protein forms a 200-nm-diameter ring structure essential for polar growth and rod shape in Agrobacterium tumefaciens , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Z. Deng,et al.  Base editing in Streptomyces with Cas9-deaminase fusions , 2019, bioRxiv.

[18]  Yanpeng Wang,et al.  CRISPR/Cas Genome Editing and Precision Plant Breeding in Agriculture. , 2019, Annual review of plant biology.

[19]  M. Tester,et al.  New plant breeding technologies for food security , 2019, Science.

[20]  L. Steinmetz,et al.  Cytosine base editor generates substantial off-target single-nucleotide variants in mouse embryos , 2019, Science.

[21]  Q. Gao,et al.  Cytosine, but not adenine, base editors induce genome-wide off-target mutations in rice , 2019, Science.

[22]  K. Lowe,et al.  Using Morphogenic Genes to Improve Recovery and Regeneration of Transgenic Plants , 2019, Plants.

[23]  F. Nogué,et al.  Transgene-Free Genome Editing in Tomato and Potato Plants Using Agrobacterium-Mediated Delivery of a CRISPR/Cas9 Cytidine Base Editor , 2019, International journal of molecular sciences.

[24]  David R. Liu,et al.  Base editing: precision chemistry on the genome and transcriptome of living cells , 2018, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[25]  Huixia Wu,et al.  Coexpression of octopine and succinamopine Agrobacterium virulence genes to generate high quality transgenic events in maize by reducing vector backbone integration , 2018, Transgenic Research.

[26]  Justin P Sandoval,et al.  The complex architecture and epigenomic impact of plant T-DNA insertions , 2019, PLoS genetics.

[27]  R. Thilmony,et al.  A versatile and robust Agrobacterium‐based gene stacking system generates high‐quality transgenic Arabidopsis plants , 2018, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[28]  John R. Garbe,et al.  EditR: A Method to Quantify Base Editing from Sanger Sequencing , 2018, The CRISPR journal.

[29]  Yu Wang,et al.  MACBETH: Multiplex automated Corynebacterium glutamicum base editing method. , 2018, Metabolic engineering.

[30]  Ning Wang,et al.  An improved ternary vector system for Agrobacterium-mediated rapid maize transformation , 2018, Plant Molecular Biology.

[31]  Yang Wang,et al.  Highly efficient base editing in bacteria using a Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusion , 2018, Communications Biology.

[32]  Dali Han,et al.  Highly efficient base editing in Staphylococcus aureus using an engineered CRISPR RNA-guided cytidine deaminase† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c8sc00637g , 2018, Chemical science.

[33]  A. Kondo,et al.  Deaminase-mediated multiplex genome editing in Escherichia coli , 2018, Nature Microbiology.

[34]  C. Waters,et al.  The Agrobacterium tumefaciens CheY-like protein ClaR regulates biofilm formation. , 2017, Microbiology.

[35]  Nicole M. Gaudelli,et al.  Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage , 2017, Nature.

[36]  L. Otten,et al.  Natural Agrobacterium Transformants: Recent Results and Some Theoretical Considerations , 2017, Front. Plant Sci..

[37]  C. Amemiya,et al.  Biochemical Regulatory Features of Activation-Induced Cytidine Deaminase Remain Conserved from Lampreys to Humans , 2017, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[38]  Zhanyuan J. Zhang,et al.  Selectable marker independent transformation of recalcitrant maize inbred B73 and sorghum P898012 mediated by morphogenic regulators BABY BOOM and WUSCHEL2 , 2017, Plant Cell Reports.

[39]  Mazhar Adli,et al.  CRISPR-STOP: gene silencing through base-editing-induced nonsense mutations , 2017, Nature Methods.

[40]  L. Pedersen,et al.  Activation-induced deoxycytidine deaminase: Structural basis for favoring WRC hot motif specificities unique among APOBEC family members. , 2017, DNA repair.

[41]  H. Rediers,et al.  Rhizogenic agrobacteria in hydroponic crops: epidemics, diagnostics and control , 2017 .

[42]  Jenny Banh,et al.  Morphogenic Regulators Baby boom and Wuschel Improve Monocot Transformation[OPEN] , 2016, Plant Cell.

[43]  Peggy G. Lemaux,et al.  Advancing Crop Transformation in the Era of Genome Editing[OPEN] , 2016, Plant Cell.

[44]  J. Vogel,et al.  Use of Agrobacterium rhizogenes Strain 18r12v and Paromomycin Selection for Transformation of Brachypodium distachyon and Brachypodium sylvaticum , 2016, Front. Plant Sci..

[45]  David R. Liu,et al.  Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage , 2016, Nature.

[46]  M·古普塔,et al.  Methods and compositions for recombination a gene-deficient strains of agrobacterium tumefaciens , 2015 .

[47]  Martin J. Aryee,et al.  Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities , 2015, Nature.

[48]  Neville E. Sanjana,et al.  High-throughput functional genomics using CRISPR–Cas9 , 2015, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[49]  L. Banta,et al.  Unmasking host and microbial strategies in the Agrobacterium-plant defense tango , 2015, Front. Plant Sci..

[50]  Tao Lin,et al.  Transcriptomic analysis reveals that reactive oxygen species and genes encoding lipid transfer protein are associated with tobacco hairy root growth and branch development. , 2014, Molecular plant-microbe interactions : MPMI.

[51]  Helen O. Masson,et al.  Hairy Root Transformation Using Agrobacterium rhizogenes as a Tool for Exploring Cell Type-Specific Gene Expression and Function Using Tomato as a Model1[W][OPEN] , 2014, Plant Physiology.

[52]  A. F. Stewart,et al.  Genome engineering of Agrobacterium tumefaciens using the lambda Red recombination system , 2014, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[53]  A. Pitzschke Agrobacterium infection and plant defense—transformation success hangs by a thread , 2013, Front. Plant Sci..

[54]  R. Doerge,et al.  Cytokinins Secreted by Agrobacterium Promote Transformation by Repressing a Plant Myb Transcription Factor , 2013, Science Signaling.

[55]  George M. Church,et al.  Genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas systems , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[56]  James E. DiCarlo,et al.  RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9 , 2013, Science.

[57]  Le Cong,et al.  Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems , 2013, Science.

[58]  J. Doudna,et al.  A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity , 2012, Science.

[59]  Dirk Inzé,et al.  Brachypodium distachyon promoters as efficient building blocks for transgenic research in maize. , 2012, Journal of experimental botany.

[60]  Gynheung An,et al.  Bacterial transposons are co-transferred with T-DNA to rice chromosomes during Agrobacterium-mediated transformation , 2012, Molecules and cells.

[61]  C. Fuqua,et al.  Genetic Manipulation of Agrobacterium , 2012, Current protocols in microbiology.

[62]  Bingyu Zhao,et al.  A novel Gateway®-compatible binary vector allows direct selection of recombinant clones in Agrobacterium tumefaciens , 2011, Plant Methods.

[63]  S. Fortune,et al.  Variation among Genome Sequences of H37Rv Strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Multiple Laboratories , 2010, Journal of bacteriology.

[64]  W. Ream Agrobacterium tumefaciens and A. rhizogenes use different proteins to transport bacterial DNA into the plant cell nucleus , 2009, Microbial biotechnology.

[65]  K. Pappas Cell-cell signaling and the Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti plasmid copy number fluctuations. , 2008, Plasmid.

[66]  I. Somssich,et al.  T-DNA–mediated transfer of Agrobacterium tumefaciens chromosomal DNA into plants , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[67]  S. Sriskandarajah,et al.  Transformation of Kalanchoe blossfeldiana with rol-genes is useful in molecular breeding towards compact growth , 2008, Plant Cell Reports.

[68]  S. Gelvin,et al.  T-DNA Binary Vectors and Systems , 2007, Plant Physiology.

[69]  H. Fu,et al.  Disarming and sequencing of Agrobacterium rhizogenes strain K599 (NCPPB2659) plasmid pRi2659 , 2007, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant.

[70]  T. Jones,et al.  A novel Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation method of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] using primary-node explants from seedlings , 2007, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant.

[71]  C. Kuhlemeier,et al.  The orf13 T-DNA Gene of Agrobacterium rhizogenes Confers Meristematic Competence to Differentiated Cells1 , 2004, Plant Physiology.

[72]  S. Gelvin Agrobacterium-Mediated Plant Transformation: the Biology behind the “Gene-Jockeying” Tool , 2003, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[73]  T. E. Wilson,et al.  Non-homologous end-joining: bacteria join the chromosome breakdance. , 2003, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[74]  P. Majumder,et al.  Isolation and Characterization of a New Virulence Gene (abvA) of Agrobacterium tumefaciens , 2001, Journal of General Plant Pathology.

[75]  S. C. Winans,et al.  Wound-Released Chemical Signals May Elicit Multiple Responses from an Agrobacterium tumefaciens Strain Containing an Octopine-Type Ti Plasmid , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[76]  R. A. Ludwig,et al.  A DNA Transformation–Competent Arabidopsis Genomic Library in Agrobacterium , 1991, Bio/Technology.

[77]  A. D. Paolis,et al.  The non-conserved region of cucumopine-type Agrobacterium rhizogenes T-DNA is responsible for hairy root induction , 1990, Plant Molecular Biology.

[78]  S. Farrand,et al.  Construction of an Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 recA mutant , 1989, Journal of bacteriology.

[79]  M. Chilton,et al.  The hypervirulence of Agrobacterium tumefaciens A281 is encoded in a region of pTiBo542 outside of T-DNA , 1986, Journal of bacteriology.

[80]  P. Zambryski,et al.  virA and virG control the plant-induced activation of the T-DNA transfer process of A. tumefaciens , 1986, Cell.

[81]  E. Nester,et al.  The genetic and transcriptional organization of the vir region of the A6 Ti plasmid of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. , 1986, The EMBO journal.

[82]  D. Inzé,et al.  Genetic evidence that the tryptophan 2-mono-oxygenase gene of Pseudomonas savastonoi is functionally equivalent to one of the T-DNA genes involved in plant tumour formation by Agrobacterium tumefaciens , 1985, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[83]  S. G. Rogers,et al.  Identification of a cloned cytokinin biosynthetic gene. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[84]  M. Thomashow,et al.  Crown gall oncogenesis: evidence that a T-DNA gene from the Agrobacterium Ti plasmid pTiA6 encodes an enzyme that catalyzes synthesis of indoleacetic acid. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[85]  M. Montagu,et al.  Interactions and DNA transfer between Agrobacterium tumefaciens, the Ti-plasmid and the plant host , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[86]  M. Van Montagu,et al.  Mutagenesis by insertion of the drug resistance transposon Tn7 applied to the Ti plasmid of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. , 1978, Plasmid.

[87]  L. Otten The Agrobacterium Phenotypic Plasticity (Plast) Genes. , 2018, Current topics in microbiology and immunology.

[88]  Meizhong Luo,et al.  VirD5 is required for efficient Agrobacterium infection and interacts with Arabidopsis VIP2. , 2018, The New phytologist.

[89]  A. Depicker,et al.  Update on Recombinational Cloning with Plant Gateway Vectors Recombinational Cloning with Plant Gateway Vectors , 2007 .

[90]  Toshihiko Komari,et al.  Binary vectors and super-binary vectors. , 2006, Methods in molecular biology.

[91]  J. Collens,et al.  Development of Auxotrophic Agrobacterium tumefaciens for Gene Transfer in Plant Tissue Culture , 2004, Biotechnology progress.