Specifying Knowledge Graph with Data Graph, Information Graph, Knowledge Graph, and Wisdom Graph

Knowledge graphs have been widely adopted, in large part owing to their schema-less nature. It enables knowledge graphs to grow seamlessly and allows for new relationships and entities as needed. A knowledge graph is a graph constructed by representing each item, entity and user as nodes, and linking those nodes that interact with each other via edges. Knowledge graphs have abundant natural semantics and can contain various and more complete information. It is an expression mechanism close to natural language. However, we still lack a unified definition and standard expression form of knowledge graph. The authors propose to clarify the expression of knowledge graph as a whole. They clarify the architecture of knowledge graph from data, information, knowledge, and wisdom aspects respectively. The authors also propose to specify knowledge graph in a progressive manner as four basic forms including data graph, information graph, knowledge graph and wisdom graph.

[1]  Abad Shah,et al.  Data, Information, Knowledge, Wisdom: A Doubly Linked Chain? , 2006, IKE.

[2]  Marie-Laure Mugnier,et al.  Graph-based Knowledge Representation - Computational Foundations of Conceptual Graphs , 2008, Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing.

[3]  Han Xiao,et al.  TransG : A Generative Model for Knowledge Graph Embedding , 2015, ACL.

[4]  John Miller,et al.  Traversing Knowledge Graphs in Vector Space , 2015, EMNLP.

[5]  Anna Mette Fuglseth,et al.  The Effectiveness of data presentation formats: An Exploratory Study , 2014 .

[6]  F. Lamberti,et al.  A Relation-Based Page Rank Algorithm for Semantic Web Search Engines , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[7]  Yun-Heh Chen-Burger,et al.  Mapping Fundamental Business Process Modelling Language to OWL-S , 2006, SETN.

[8]  Chaim Zins.  Conceptual approaches for defining data, information, and knowledge: Research Articles , 2007 .

[9]  William A. Wallace,et al.  Intelligent Interface Design: An Empirical Assessment of Knowledge Presentation in Expert Systems , 1990, MIS Q..

[10]  Yucong Duan,et al.  Bidirectional value driven design between economical planning and technical implementation based on data graph, information graph and knowledge graph , 2017, 2017 IEEE 15th International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications (SERA).

[11]  Yucong Duan,et al.  Answering Who/When, What, How, Why through Constructing Data Graph, Information Graph, Knowledge Graph and Wisdom Graph , 2017, SEKE.

[12]  Kuldar Taveter,et al.  eContractual choreography-language properties towards cross-organizational business collaboration , 2015, Journal of Internet Services and Applications.

[13]  Yun-Heh Chen-Burger,et al.  An ontology-based conceptual mapping framework for translating FBPML to the Web services ontology , 2006, Sixth IEEE International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid (CCGRID'06).

[14]  Han Xiao,et al.  Knowledge Semantic Representation: A Generative Model for Interpretable Knowledge Graph Embedding , 2016, ArXiv.

[15]  Yucong Duan,et al.  Specifying architecture of knowledge graph with data graph, information graph, knowledge graph and wisdom graph , 2017, 2017 IEEE 15th International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications (SERA).

[16]  Paul Cooper,et al.  Data, information, knowledge and wisdom , 2014 .

[17]  Yucong Duan,et al.  Refinement from service economics planning to ubiquitous services implementation , 2016, 2016 IEEE/ACIS 15th International Conference on Computer and Information Science (ICIS).

[18]  Nicola Fanizzi,et al.  Scalable Learning of Entity and Predicate Embeddings for Knowledge Graph Completion , 2015, 2015 IEEE 14th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA).

[19]  Stuart C. Shapiro.  Review of Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical, and computational foundations by John F. Sowa. Brooks/Cole 2000. , 2001 .

[20]  Chaim Zins,et al.  Conceptual approaches for defining data, information, and knowledge , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..