Montelukast, a once-daily leukotriene receptor antagonist, in the treatment of chronic asthma: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial. Montelukast Clinical Research Study Group.

OBJECTIVES To determine the clinical effect of oral montelukast sodium, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, in asthmatic patients aged 15 years or more. DESIGN Randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. A 2-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period was followed by a 12-week, double-blind treatment period (montelukast sodium, 10 mg, or matching placebo, once daily at bedtime) and a 3-week, double-blind, washout period. SETTING/PATIENTS Fifty clinical centers randomly allocated 681 patients with chronic, stable asthma to receive placebo or montelukast after demonstrating a forced expiratory volume in 1 second 50% to 85% of the predicted value, at least a 15% improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (absolute value) after inhaled beta-agonist administration, a minimal predefined level of daytime asthma symptoms, and inhaled beta-agonist use. Twenty-three percent of the patients used concomitant inhaled corticosteroids. PRIMARY END POINTS: Forced expiratory volume in 1 second and daytime asthma symptoms. RESULTS Montelukast improved airway obstruction (forced expiratory volume in 1 second, morning and evening peak expiratory flow rate) and patient-reported end points (daytime asthma symptoms, "as-needed" beta-agonist use, nocturnal awakenings) (P<.001 compared with placebo). Montelukast provided near-maximal effect in these end points within the first day of treatment. Tolerance and rebound worsening of asthma did not occur. Montelukast improved outcome end points, including asthma exacerbations, asthma control days (P<.001 compared with placebo), and decreased peripheral blood eosinophil counts (P<.001 compared with placebo). The incidence of adverse events and discontinuations from therapy were similar in the montelukast and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS Montelukast, compared with placebo, significantly improved asthma control during a 12-week treatment period. Montelukast was generally well tolerated, with an adverse event profile comparable with that of placebo.

[1]  R Horne,et al.  Compliance in asthma. , 1999, Respiratory medicine.

[2]  T. Reiss,et al.  A placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study of montelukast, a cysteinyl leukotriene-receptor antagonist. Montelukast Asthma Study Group. , 1998, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[3]  T. Reiss,et al.  Montelukast, a potent leukotriene receptor antagonist, causes dose-related improvements in chronic asthma. Montelukast Asthma Study Group. , 1998, The European respiratory journal.

[4]  N. Santanello,et al.  Measurement characteristics of two asthma symptom diary scales for use in clinical trials. , 1997, The European respiratory journal.

[5]  P. O'Byrne,et al.  Prolonged protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction by the leukotriene D4-receptor antagonist cinalukast. , 1997, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[6]  M. Decramer,et al.  Montelukast causes prolonged, potent leukotriene D4‐receptor antagonism in the airways of patients with asthma , 1997, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[7]  J Zhang,et al.  Effects of montelukast (MK-0476); a potent cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist, on bronchodilation in asthmatic subjects treated with and without inhaled corticosteroids. , 1997, Thorax.

[8]  J Zhang,et al.  Effects of montelukast (MK-0476), a new potent cysteinyl leukotriene (LTD4) receptor antagonist, in patients with chronic asthma. , 1996, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[9]  E. Israel,et al.  Effect of treatment with zileuton, a 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor, in patients with asthma. A randomized controlled trial. Zileuton Clinical Trial Group. , 1996, JAMA.

[10]  John L. Hankinson,et al.  Standardization of Spirometry, 1994 Update. American Thoracic Society. , 1995, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[11]  J. Evans,et al.  Pharmacology of montelukast sodium (Singulair), a potent and selective leukotriene D4 receptor antagonist. , 1995, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[12]  Goldstein Ra,et al.  NIH conference. Asthma. , 1994 .

[13]  S. Spector,et al.  Effects of 6 weeks of therapy with oral doses of ICI 204,219, a leukotriene D4 receptor antagonist, in subjects with bronchial asthma. ACCOLATE Asthma Trialists Group. , 1994, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[14]  J. Oates,et al.  Effect of oral prednisone on airway inflammatory mediators in atopic asthma. , 1994, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[15]  G H Guyatt,et al.  Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. , 1994, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[16]  W. Busse,et al.  The Effect of Inhibition of 5-Lipoxygenase by Zileuton in Mild-to-Moderate Asthma , 1993, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[17]  K. Offord,et al.  Aerosol beclomethasone dipropionate compared with theophylline as primary treatment of chronic, mild to moderately severe asthma in children. , 1993, Pediatrics.

[18]  T. Haahtela,et al.  Leukotriene E4 and granulocytic infiltration into asthmatic airways , 1993, The Lancet.

[19]  A. Hoffbrand,et al.  Do leukotrienes play a role in the regulation of proliferation of normal and leukemic hemopoietic cells? , 1993, Prostaglandins, leukotrienes, and essential fatty acids.

[20]  P. Gergen,et al.  An economic evaluation of asthma in the United States. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Evaluation of impairment of health related quality of life in asthma: development of a questionnaire for use in clinical trials. , 1992, Thorax.

[22]  T. Petty,et al.  Cromolyn sodium is effective in adult chronic asthmatics. , 1989, The American review of respiratory disease.

[23]  Buist As Standardization of spirometry. , 1987 .

[24]  E. R. Mcfadden,et al.  Effects of leukotriene D on the airways in asthma. , 1983, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  S. Langlois,et al.  Comparison of withdrawal phenomena after propranolol, metoprolol and pindolol. , 1982, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[26]  R. Rangno,et al.  Mechanism of Propranolol Withdrawal Phenomena , 1979, Circulation.

[27]  P. Molinoff,et al.  In vitro study of beta-adrenergic receptors. , 1977, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.