A Machine Learning Method for the Prediction of Receptor Activation in the Simulation of Synapses

Chemical synaptic transmission involves the release of a neurotransmitter that diffuses in the extracellular space and interacts with specific receptors located on the postsynaptic membrane. Computer simulation approaches provide fundamental tools for exploring various aspects of the synaptic transmission under different conditions. In particular, Monte Carlo methods can track the stochastic movements of neurotransmitter molecules and their interactions with other discrete molecules, the receptors. However, these methods are computationally expensive, even when used with simplified models, preventing their use in large-scale and multi-scale simulations of complex neuronal systems that may involve large numbers of synaptic connections. We have developed a machine-learning based method that can accurately predict relevant aspects of the behavior of synapses, such as the percentage of open synaptic receptors as a function of time since the release of the neurotransmitter, with considerably lower computational cost compared with the conventional Monte Carlo alternative. The method is designed to learn patterns and general principles from a corpus of previously generated Monte Carlo simulations of synapses covering a wide range of structural and functional characteristics. These patterns are later used as a predictive model of the behavior of synapses under different conditions without the need for additional computationally expensive Monte Carlo simulations. This is performed in five stages: data sampling, fold creation, machine learning, validation and curve fitting. The resulting procedure is accurate, automatic, and it is general enough to predict synapse behavior under experimental conditions that are different to the ones it has been trained on. Since our method efficiently reproduces the results that can be obtained with Monte Carlo simulations at a considerably lower computational cost, it is suitable for the simulation of high numbers of synapses and it is therefore an excellent tool for multi-scale simulations.

[1]  Peter Somogyi,et al.  Cell Type and Pathway Dependence of Synaptic AMPA Receptor Number and Variability in the Hippocampus , 1998, Neuron.

[2]  Theodore W. Berger,et al.  Integrated Multiscale Modeling of the Nervous System: Predicting Changes in Hippocampal Network Activity by a Positive AMPA Receptor Modulator , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Christopher J. Lee.  Open Peer Review by a Selected-Papers Network , 2011, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[4]  C. Nicholson,et al.  Diffusion in brain extracellular space. , 2008, Physiological reviews.

[5]  Petter Laake,et al.  Different modes of expression of AMPA and NMDA receptors in hippocampal synapses , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  J. Friedman,et al.  Projection Pursuit Regression , 1981 .

[7]  P. Maini,et al.  Multiscale modeling in biology , 2007 .

[8]  Terrence J Sejnowski,et al.  A Monte Carlo model reveals independent signaling at central glutamatergic synapses. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[9]  Scott B. Baden,et al.  Fast Monte Carlo Simulation Methods for Biological Reaction-Diffusion Systems in Solution and on Surfaces , 2008, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[10]  K. P. Lehre,et al.  The Number of Glutamate Transporter Subtype Molecules at Glutamatergic Synapses: Chemical and Stereological Quantification in Young Adult Rat Brain , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Mark A. J. Chaplain,et al.  Multiscale mathematical modelling in biology and medicine , 2011 .

[12]  D. Kullmann,et al.  Extrasynaptic Glutamate Diffusion in the Hippocampus: Ultrastructural Constraints, Uptake, and Receptor Activation , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Charles Nicholson,et al.  In vivo diffusion analysis with quantum dots and dextrans predicts the width of brain extracellular space. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  San Cristóbal Mateo,et al.  The Lack of A Priori Distinctions Between Learning Algorithms , 1996 .

[15]  J. Henley,et al.  Shaping the synaptic signal: molecular mobility inside and outside the cleft , 2011, Trends in Neurosciences.

[16]  R. Silver,et al.  The density of AMPA receptors activated by a transmitter quantum at the climbing fibre‐Purkinje cell synapse in immature rats , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  Masahiko Watanabe,et al.  Input-Specific Intrasynaptic Arrangements of Ionotropic Glutamate Receptors and Their Impact on Postsynaptic Responses , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  D. Rusakov,et al.  Receptor actions of synaptically released glutamate: the role of transporters on the scale from nanometers to microns. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[19]  T. Schikorski,et al.  Inactivity Produces Increases in Neurotransmitter Release and Synapse Size , 2001, Neuron.

[20]  E Weinan,et al.  Multi-scale Modeling and Computation , 2003 .

[21]  J. R. Quinlan.  Learning With Continuous Classes , 1992 .

[22]  C. Nicholson,et al.  Extracellular space structure revealed by diffusion analysis , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[23]  อนิรุธ สืบสิงห์,et al.  Data Mining Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques , 2014 .

[24]  Helmut Kröger,et al.  Realistic modelling of receptor activation in hippocampal excitatory synapses: analysis of multivesicular release, release location, temperature and synaptic cross-talk , 2010, Brain Structure and Function.

[25]  Roger Brent,et al.  Detailed Simulations of Cell Biology with Smoldyn 2.1 , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[26]  Thomas A. Nielsen,et al.  Modulation of Glutamate Mobility Reveals the Mechanism Underlying Slow-Rising AMPAR EPSCs and the Diffusion Coefficient in the Synaptic Cleft , 2004, Neuron.

[27]  P. Bassereau,et al.  Lateral Diffusion on Tubular Membranes: Quantification of Measurements Bias , 2011, PloS one.

[28]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  Induction of model trees for predicting continuous classes , 1996 .

[29]  J. DeFelipe,et al.  Gender differences in human cortical synaptic density , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  I. Shrivastava,et al.  Simulations of ion permeation through a potassium channel: molecular dynamics of KcsA in a phospholipid bilayer. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[31]  S. Plimpton,et al.  Microbial cell modeling via reacting diffusive particles , 2005 .

[32]  T. Secomb,et al.  Effect of cell arrangement and interstitial volume fraction on the diffusivity of monoclonal antibodies in tissue. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[33]  Nicholas T. Carnevale,et al.  Simulation of networks of spiking neurons: A review of tools and strategies , 2006, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[34]  D. Bray,et al.  Stochastic simulation of chemical reactions with spatial resolution and single molecule detail , 2004, Physical biology.

[35]  L. Savtchenko,et al.  The optimal height of the synaptic cleft , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  R. Weinberg,et al.  Immunogold localization of AMPA and NMDA receptors in somatic sensory cortex of albino rat , 1999, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[37]  T. Schikorski,et al.  Quantitative Ultrastructural Analysis of Hippocampal Excitatory Synapses Materials and Methods Terminology Fixation and Embedding , 2022 .

[38]  D. Bruns,et al.  Real-time measurement of transmitter release from single synaptic vesicles , 1995, Nature.

[39]  Erik De Schutter,et al.  Monte Carlo Methods for Simulating Realistic Synaptic Microphysiology Using MCell , 2000 .

[40]  Michael L. Hines,et al.  The NEURON Book , 2006 .

[41]  L. Savtchenko,et al.  Central Synapses Release a Resource-Efficient Amount of Glutamate , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  Theodore W. Berger,et al.  A Computational Model to Investigate Astrocytic Glutamate Uptake Influence on Synaptic Transmission and Neuronal Spiking , 2012, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[43]  E. Gray,et al.  The Fine Structure of the Nervous System , 1971 .

[44]  J. Freidman,et al.  Multivariate adaptive regression splines , 1991 .

[45]  David Gavaghan,et al.  Multi-scale computational modelling in biology and physiology , 2007, Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology.

[46]  G. Colombo,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of proteins and peptides: from folding to drug design. , 2008, Current protein & peptide science.

[47]  Erik De Schutter,et al.  Computational neuroscience : realistic modeling for experimentalists , 2000 .

[48]  S. Hyakin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1994 .

[49]  E. Teller,et al.  Regression and Correlation Analysis , 1990 .

[50]  Efthimios Kaxiras,et al.  An Overview of Multiscale Simulations of Materials , 2004 .

[51]  James M. Bower,et al.  The book of GENESIS - exploring realistic neural models with the GEneral NEural SImulation System (2. ed.) , 1994 .

[52]  V. Tennyson.  The Fine Structure of the Nervous System. , 1970 .

[53]  M L Hines,et al.  Neuron: A Tool for Neuroscientists , 2001, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[54]  S. Palay,et al.  The Fine Structure of the Nervous System: Neurons and Their Supporting Cells , 1991 .

[55]  Belur V. Dasarathy,et al.  Nearest neighbor (NN) norms: NN pattern classification techniques , 1991 .

[56]  M. Praprotnik,et al.  Multiscale molecular modeling. , 2013, Methods in molecular biology.

[57]  Adel K. Afifi,et al.  The Fine Structure of the Nervous System , 1991, Neurology.

[58]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Quantal components of unitary EPSCs at the mossy fibre synapse on CA3 pyramidal cells of rat hippocampus. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[59]  K. Moulder,et al.  Spontaneous and Evoked Glutamate Release Activates Two Populations of NMDA Receptors with Limited Overlap , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[60]  Kristen M Harris,et al.  Ultrastructure of synapses in the mammalian brain. , 2012, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[61]  K. Fuxe,et al.  From the Golgi–Cajal mapping to the transmitter-based characterization of the neuronal networks leading to two modes of brain communication: Wiring and volume transmission , 2007, Brain Research Reviews.