Salmonella control--past, present and future.

The perception of Salmonella infection as a problem to the poultry industry has changed as the industry itself has changed. Other factors include increasing awareness of health and food quality. Acquisition of more information on the microbiology of Salmonella and the epidemiology of infection in poultry and man, have not, with a few exceptions, enabled us to eliminate Salmonella from poultry and from the food chain. Control of the poultry pathogens S. Pullorum and S. Gallinarum, the major pathogens of concern to the industry in the early days of intensification, was achieved in many countries by a coordinated policy of hygienic measures together with serological testing and slaughter. However, fowl typhoid and pullorum disease remain major economic problems in many countries and attempts should continue to improve the methods for their control. More recent problems involving establishment in national flocks of Salmonella serotypes of public health significance, such as Typhimurium and Enteritidis are more intractable because of their more complex epidemiology involving extensive faecal excretion with associated environmental contamination and the existence of many additional reservoirs of infection. At the very minimum most countries are increasing monitoring of these and other serotypes. Some countries with relatively small, isolated national flocks have been able to reduce the incidence of infection in poultry and man to very low levels by rigorous monitoring and slaughter. Changes in legislation in the United Kingdom and the European Community will attempt to reduce the incidence of infection in breeding flocks and to reduce the significance of animal feed as a source of infection. Whilst these measures and continued research programmes are essential more could be done in terms of management, farm hygiene and feed production. A co-ordinated approach would require the approval of the industry in the first instance which presupposes a degree of financial support for some of the measures that would be necessary. Because of the potentially enormous cost of such control measures and the disruption to the poultry industry that could occur discussions must initially be instigated with relevant parties as to the desire for Salmonella control and the extent to which it should be taken.

[1]  G. Mead Problems of producing safe poultry: discussion paper. , 1993, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[2]  H. Griffin,et al.  Construction of an aroA mutant of Salmonella serotype Gallinarum: its effectiveness in immunization against experimental fowl typhoid. , 1993, Vaccine.

[3]  P. Barrow ELISAs and the serological analysis of salmonella infections in poultry: a review , 1992, Epidemiology and Infection.

[4]  P. Barrow,et al.  In-vitro and in-vivo characteristics of TnphoA mutant strains of Salmonella serotype Gallinarum not invasive for tissue culture cells. , 1992, Journal of medical microbiology.

[5]  P. Barrow,et al.  Serological response of chickens to infection with Salmonella gallinarum-S. pullorum detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. , 1992, Avian diseases.

[6]  P. Hunter,et al.  Serotype abundance distributions in reports of Salmonella incidents in domestic livestock as indicators of the population biology of Salmonella infections , 1992 .

[7]  P. Barrow,et al.  The use of two live attenuated vaccines to immunize egg-laying hens against Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4. , 1991, Avian pathology : journal of the W.V.P.A.

[8]  P. Barrow,et al.  In vitro characterization of intra-generic inhibition of growth in Salmonella typhimurium. , 1991, Journal of general microbiology.

[9]  P. Barrow,et al.  Experimental infection of egg-laying hens with Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4. , 1991, Avian pathology : journal of the W.V.P.A.

[10]  P. Barrow,et al.  The activity in the chicken alimentary tract of bacteriophages lytic for Salmonella typhimurium. , 1991, Research in microbiology.

[11]  T. Humphrey,et al.  The influence of age on the response of SPF hens to infection with Salmonella enteritidis PT4 , 1991, Epidemiology and Infection.

[12]  R. Beier,et al.  EFFECT OF DIETARY LACTOSE AND ANAEROBIC CULTURES OF CECAL FLORA ON SALMONELLA COLONIZATION OF BROILER CHICKS , 1991 .

[13]  P. Barrow IMMUNOLOGICAL CONTROL OF SALMONELLA IN POULTRY , 1991 .

[14]  R. Marshall,et al.  Laboratory assessment of protection given by an experimental Salmonella enteritidis PT4 inactivated, adjuvant vaccine , 1990, Veterinary Record.

[15]  P. Hunter,et al.  Diversity studies of salmonella incidents in some domestic livestock and their potential relevance as indicators of niche width , 1990, Epidemiology and Infection.

[16]  R. Nicholas,et al.  Vaccination of chickens with a Salmonella enteritidis aroA live oral Salmonella vaccine. , 1990, Microbial pathogenesis.

[17]  B Rowe,et al.  International increase in Salmonella enteritidis: A new pandemic? , 1990, Epidemiology and Infection.

[18]  J. Timoney,et al.  Pathogenesis of Salmonella enteritidis infection in laying chickens. I. Studies on egg transmission, clinical signs, fecal shedding, and serologic responses. , 1990, Avian diseases.

[19]  P. Barrow Immunity to experimental fowl typhoid in chickens induced by a virulence plasmid-cured derivative of Salmonella gallinarum , 1990, Infection and immunity.

[20]  P. Barrow,et al.  Reduction in faecal excretion of Salmonella typhimurium strain F98 in chickens vaccinated with live and killed S. typhimurium organisms , 1990, Epidemiology and Infection.

[21]  P. Barrow,et al.  Antibody response to experimental Salmonella typhimurium infection in chickens measured by ELISA , 1990, Veterinary Record.

[22]  R. Gast,et al.  Production of Salmonella enteritidis-contaminated eggs by experimentally infected hens. , 1990, Avian diseases.

[23]  H. Dadrast,et al.  Egg yolk antibody detection in identification of salmonella infected poultry , 1990, Veterinary Record.

[24]  R. Nicholas,et al.  Serological and bacteriological investigations of chickens from flocks naturally infected with Salmonella enteritidis , 1989, Veterinary Record.

[25]  P. W. Jones Salmonellosis control: The role of animal and product hygiene: Technical report series, no. 774. Geneva: WHO. 1988. 84 pp. £4.50. English, french, spanish in preparation , 1989 .

[26]  M. Popoff,et al.  Designation of Salmonella enterica sp. nov., nom. rev., as the Type and Only Species of the Genus Salmonella: Request for an Opinion , 1987 .

[27]  P. Barrow,et al.  Inhibition of colonization of the chicken alimentary tract with Salmonella typhimurium gram-negative facultatively anaerobic bacteria , 1987, Epidemiology and Infection.

[28]  M. Binns,et al.  Contribution of Salmonella gallinarum large plasmid toward virulence in fowl typhoid , 1987, Infection and immunity.

[29]  R. R. Henry,et al.  Development of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of humoral antibody to Pasteurella anatipestifer. , 1987, Avian pathology : journal of the W.V.P.A.

[30]  J. Hughes,et al.  Identification of a carrier by using Vi enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay serology in an outbreak of typhoid fever on an Indian reservation , 1983, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[31]  J. Darbyshire,et al.  Comparative studies with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for antibodies to avian infectious bronchitis virus. , 1981, Avian pathology : journal of the W.V.P.A.

[32]  W. Henderson The disease handicap to animal production. , 1976, The British veterinary journal.

[33]  H. Smith,et al.  The use of live vaccines in experimental Salmonella gallinarum infection in chickens with observations on their interference effect , 1956, Journal of Hygiene.

[34]  H. Smith,et al.  Observations on experimental fowl typhoid. , 1955, Journal of comparative pathology.

[35]  Jones Fs,et al.  The value of the Macroscopic Agglutination Test in Detecting Fowls that are Harboring Bact. Pullorum. , 1913 .